Lucus Augusti Hospital, Servizo Galego de Saúde, Rúa Dr. Ulises Romero, nº 1, 27004 Lugo, Spain.
Research Centers for Industrial and Technology Management & Algoritmi, School of Engineering, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.
Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:209-222. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
Specific methods currently exist to assess occupational hazards resulting from patient handling in the healthcare sector, according to ISO/TR 12296. They are all similar in nature, but with a different analysis perspective; for that reason a comparison of the most relevant methods was performed in a previous research. As a result, a basis of a new tool that integrates the complementary aspects of those methods was proposed. To verify the validity and reliability of that method, a study within a hospital setting was carried out in five medical and surgical units of a public health institution. Based on the obtained results, the analysed method (called HEMPA) proved to be valid and reliable. Also, this method reflects a positive correlation between risk and damage and correctly quantifies risks regarding patient's dependence.
根据 ISO/TR 12296,目前存在一些评估医疗保健领域中因患者搬运而产生的职业危害的具体方法。这些方法在本质上相似,但分析角度不同;因此,在之前的研究中对最相关的方法进行了比较。结果,提出了一种新工具的基础,该工具整合了这些方法的互补方面。为了验证该方法的有效性和可靠性,在一家公共医疗机构的五个医疗和外科单位进行了一项医院内的研究。根据获得的结果,分析方法(称为 HEMPA)被证明是有效和可靠的。此外,该方法反映了风险和损害之间的正相关关系,并正确量化了患者依赖程度的风险。