• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

价值观与成年年龄:来自欧洲社会调查两个队列的研究结果

Values and adult age: findings from two cohorts of the European Social Survey.

作者信息

Robinson Oliver C

机构信息

University of Greenwich, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2012 Oct 10;10(1):11-23. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0247-3. eCollection 2013 Mar.

DOI:10.1007/s10433-012-0247-3
PMID:28804279
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5549227/
Abstract

Human values are assessed biannually in a multinational sample as part of the European Social Survey (ESS). Based on theories of adaptive ageing, it was predicted that ten lower order values and four higher order values would show age differences that would be invariant across (a) two sample cohorts (2002 and 2008), (b) gender and (c) 12 industrialised nations. The value categories measured by the ESS are the following: conservative values (tradition, conformity and security), openness to change values (self-direction, hedonism and stimulation), self-transcendent values (universalism, benevolence) and self-enhancement values (power, achievement). Of the ten lower order values, shows the strongest positive relation with adult age, while the value of shows the strongest negative relation with age. With regards to the four higher order value categories, conservative values increased across age groups, while openness to change values decreased. Neither of these value types showed cohort or gender differences. Self-transcendence values were greater in midlife and older adults compared with young adults, were higher in women than in men, and higher in the 2008 compared with the 2002 cohort. Self-enhancement values showed a negative relation with age, with men of all age groups scoring higher in this value type than women. Age effects on the four higher order value types were replicated across all 12 countries in the sample, with the single exception of self-enhancement values in Spain, which show no relation with age.

摘要

作为欧洲社会调查(ESS)的一部分,对一个多国样本每两年进行一次人类价值观评估。基于适应性衰老理论,研究预测十个低阶价值观和四个高阶价值观会呈现出年龄差异,且这种差异在以下方面具有不变性:(a)两个样本队列(2002年和2008年);(b)性别;(c)12个工业化国家。ESS所测量的价值类别如下:保守价值观(传统、遵从和安全)、对变化的开放性价值观(自主、享乐主义和刺激)、自我超越价值观(普遍主义、仁爱)和自我提升价值观(权力、成就)。在十个低阶价值观中, 与成年年龄呈现出最强的正相关关系,而 价值观与年龄呈现出最强的负相关关系。关于四个高阶价值类别,保守价值观在各年龄组中有所增加,而对变化的开放性价值观则有所下降。这两种价值类型均未显示出队列或性别差异。与年轻人相比,自我超越价值观在中年人和老年人中更强,女性高于男性,且2008年队列高于2002年队列。自我提升价值观与年龄呈负相关,所有年龄组的男性在这种价值类型上的得分均高于女性。样本中的所有12个国家都再现了年龄对四种高阶价值类型的影响,唯一的例外是西班牙的自我提升价值观与年龄无关。

相似文献

1
Values and adult age: findings from two cohorts of the European Social Survey.价值观与成年年龄:来自欧洲社会调查两个队列的研究结果
Eur J Ageing. 2012 Oct 10;10(1):11-23. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0247-3. eCollection 2013 Mar.
2
Values and economic performance across European welfare state regimes: Direct and indirect effects through social capital, human capital and managerial skills.欧洲福利国家模式下的价值观和经济绩效:通过社会资本、人力资本和管理技能的直接和间接影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0298667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298667. eCollection 2024.
3
Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: effects of gender equality.价值观中性别差异大小的跨国变化:性别平等的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):171-85. doi: 10.1037/a0015546.
4
A Threat to the Occident? Comparing Human Values of Muslim Immigrants, Christian, and Non-religious Natives in Western Europe.对西方的威胁?比较西欧穆斯林移民、基督教徒和无宗教信仰本土居民的人类价值观。
Front Sociol. 2020 Oct 23;5:538926. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.538926. eCollection 2020.
5
Are Dimensions of Gender Inequality Uniformly Associated With Human Values?性别不平等的维度是否与人类价值观普遍相关?
Eur J Psychol. 2021 May 31;17(2):92-102. doi: 10.5964/ejop.2261. eCollection 2021 May.
6
Personal values related to primary care specialty aspirations.与初级保健专业志向相关的个人价值观。
Fam Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(10):726-31.
7
Sex differences in value priorities: cross-cultural and multimethod studies.价值优先级中的性别差异:跨文化与多方法研究
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;89(6):1010-28. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010.
8
Value priorities in American and British female and male university students.美国和英国男女大学生的价值观优先级
J Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;143(1):127-38. doi: 10.1080/00224540309598435.
9
The psychology of pandemic policy support: unraveling the complex interplay of personal values and value congruence across 20 European countries.大流行政策支持的心理学:揭示 20 个欧洲国家个人价值观和价值观一致性的复杂相互作用。
Public Health. 2024 Nov;236:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.07.022. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
10
Personal values and individual quality of life in palliative care patients.姑息治疗患者的个人价值观与个体生活质量
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Aug;30(2):154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.02.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Constructing Schwartz values framework using the Rokeach values survey: Human value measurement in the longitudinal internet survey for social sciences.使用罗克奇价值观调查问卷构建施瓦茨价值观框架:社会科学纵向互联网调查中的人类价值观测量。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0329179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329179. eCollection 2025.
2
Age and gender differences in the value development of Dutch adults in 11 years of longitudinal data.基于11年纵向数据的荷兰成年人价值观发展中的年龄和性别差异。
J Res Pers. 2024 Dec;113:None. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104540.
3
Turkish teachers' values with rational and non-rational truth and teacher emotions in teaching.土耳其教师在教学中对理性与非理性真理的价值观以及教师情感。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 4;15:1395920. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1395920. eCollection 2024.
4
Intergenerational Synchrony and Its Effect on Bonding and Group Closeness among Young and Older Adults.代际同步及其对年轻人和老年人之间情感联系与群体亲密感的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 17;14(7):607. doi: 10.3390/bs14070607.
5
Changes in value priorities due to the COVID-19 pandemic-A 4-year cross-sectional study with German students.由于 COVID-19 大流行而导致的价值观优先级的变化——一项针对德国学生的 4 年横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0297236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297236. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Skepticism, Reasons, and Concerns Between Mass Vaccination Centers and General Practices in Germany 2021.2021年德国大规模疫苗接种中心与普通诊所之间对新冠病毒疫苗接种的怀疑态度、原因及担忧比较
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Nov 7;17:2855-2870. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S433331. eCollection 2023.
7
Roles of benefit finding in psychological and inflammatory adjustments in persons with colorectal cancer: a prospective analysis on the multidimensionality of benefit finding.获益发现对结直肠癌患者心理和炎症调节的作用:对获益发现多维性的前瞻性分析
Psychol Health. 2025 Mar;40(3):492-510. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2238280. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
8
Who is open to change after the COVID-19 pandemic? Some insights from Germany.新冠疫情之后,谁愿意做出改变?来自德国的一些见解。
J Clean Prod. 2023 Jun 16:137754. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137754.
9
Patients' Values and Desire for Autonomy: An Empirical Study from Poland.患者的价值观和自主权需求:来自波兰的实证研究。
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Sep;20(3):409-419. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10241-y. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
10
Values in Romantic Relationships.浪漫关系中的价值观。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;50(7):1066-1079. doi: 10.1177/01461672231156975. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
A motivational theory of life-span development.毕生发展的动机理论。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):32-60. doi: 10.1037/a0017668.
2
Social and emotional aging.社会和情感衰老。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:383-409. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100448.
3
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
4
Age differences in conservatism: evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style.保守主义中的年龄差异:关于人格和认知风格中介作用的证据。
J Pers. 2009 Feb;77(1):51-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00538.x. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
5
Poignancy: mixed emotional experience in the face of meaningful endings.辛酸:面对有意义的结局时的混合情感体验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jan;94(1):158-67. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.158.
6
Sex differences in value priorities: cross-cultural and multimethod studies.价值优先级中的性别差异:跨文化与多方法研究
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;89(6):1010-28. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010.
7
Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.直观推断:置信区间以及如何解读数据图表
Am Psychol. 2005 Feb-Mar;60(2):170-80. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170.
8
A GENERAL MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF DEVELOPMENTAL PROBLEMS.发育问题研究的通用模型。
Psychol Bull. 1965 Aug;64:92-107. doi: 10.1037/h0022371.
9
Learning theory and the acquisition of values.学习理论与价值观的习得
Psychol Rev. 1960 Sep;67:317-31. doi: 10.1037/h0043097.
10
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.作为动机性社会认知的政治保守主义
Psychol Bull. 2003 May;129(3):339-75. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.