Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitaetsstr. 84, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, St.-Getreu-Str. 18, 96049 Bamberg, Germany.
Brain Stimul. 2017 Nov-Dec;10(6):1112-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
Chronic tinnitus is a frequent, difficult to treat disease with high morbidity.
This multicenter randomized, sham-controlled trial investigated the efficacy and safety of 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the left temporal cortex in patients with chronic tinnitus.
Tinnitus patients were randomized to receive 10 sessions of either real or sham 1-Hz-rTMS (2000 stimuli, 110% motor threshold) to the left temporal cortex. The primary outcome was the change in the sum score of the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ) of Goebel and Hiller from baseline to end of treatment.
A total of 163 patients were enrolled in the study (real rTMS: 75; sham rTMS: 78). At day 12, the baseline mean of 43.1 TQ points in 71 patients assigned to real rTMS changed by -0.5 points; it changed by 0.5 points from a baseline of 42.1 in 75 patients randomized to sham rTMS (adjusted mean difference between groups: -1.0; 95.19% confidence interval: -3.2 to 1.2; p = 0.36). All secondary outcome measures including measures of depression and quality of life showed no significant differences either (p > 0.11). The number of participants with side-effects or adverse events did not differ between groups.
Real 1-Hz-rTMS over the left temporal cortex was well tolerated but not superior compared with sham rTMS in improving tinnitus severity. These findings are in contrast to results from studies with smaller sample sizes and put the efficacy of this rTMS protocol for treatment of chronic tinnitus into question.
Controlled Trials: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN89848288.
慢性耳鸣是一种常见的、难以治疗的疾病,发病率较高。
本多中心随机、假对照试验旨在研究左颞叶 1Hz 重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗慢性耳鸣的疗效和安全性。
将耳鸣患者随机分为真刺激组和假刺激组,分别接受左颞叶 1Hz-rTMS(2000 次刺激,110%运动阈值)治疗 10 次。主要结局指标为 Goebel 和 Hiller 耳鸣问卷(TQ)总分从基线到治疗结束的变化。
共有 163 例患者入组(真刺激组 75 例,假刺激组 78 例)。在第 12 天,71 例接受真刺激 rTMS 的患者的基线平均 TQ 为 43.1 分,下降了 0.5 分;75 例随机接受假刺激 rTMS 的患者的基线平均 TQ 为 42.1 分,下降了 0.5 分(组间调整平均差异:-1.0;95.19%置信区间:-3.2 至 1.2;p=0.36)。所有次要结局指标,包括抑郁和生活质量测量,均无显著差异(p>0.11)。两组不良反应或不良事件的发生率也无差异。
与假刺激 rTMS 相比,左颞叶 1Hz-rTMS 治疗慢性耳鸣的耐受性良好,但在改善耳鸣严重程度方面并无优势。这些发现与样本量较小的研究结果相反,对该 rTMS 方案治疗慢性耳鸣的疗效提出了质疑。