Department of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK; Dipartimento di Scienze Psicologiche, Pedagogiche e della Formazione, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 1;115:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 13.
The Cognitive Estimation Test (CET) is a widely used test to investigate estimation abilities requiring complex processes such as reasoning, the development and application of appropriate strategies, response plausibility checking as well as general knowledge and numeracy (e.g., Shallice and Evans, 1978; MacPherson et al., 2014). Thus far, it remains unknown whether the CET is both sensitive and specific to frontal lobe dysfunction. Neuroimaging techniques may not represent a useful methodology for answering this question since the complex processes involved are likely to be associated with a large network of brain regions, some of which are not functionally necessary to successfully carry out the CET. Instead, neuropsychological studies may represent a more promising investigation tool for identifying the brain areas necessary for CET performance. We recently developed two new versions of the CET (CET-A and CET-B; MacPherson et al., 2014). We investigated the overall performance and conducted an error analysis on CET-A in patients with focal, unilateral, frontal (n = 38) or posterior (n = 22) lesions and healthy controls (n = 39). We found that frontal patients' performance was impaired compared to healthy controls on CET. We also found that frontal patients generated significantly poorer estimates than posterior patients on CET-A. This could not be explained by impairments in fluid intelligence. The error analyses suggested that for CET-A, extreme and very extreme responses are impaired following frontal lobe damage. However, only very extreme responses are significantly more impaired following frontal lobe than posterior damage and so represent a measure restricted to frontal "executive" impairment, in addition to overall CET performance.
认知估计测试(CET)是一种广泛使用的测试,用于研究需要复杂过程的估计能力,例如推理、制定和应用适当策略、响应合理性检查以及一般知识和计算能力(例如,Shallice 和 Evans,1978;MacPherson 等人,2014)。到目前为止,尚不清楚 CET 是否对额叶功能障碍既敏感又特异。神经影像学技术可能不是回答这个问题的有用方法,因为所涉及的复杂过程可能与大脑区域的一个大网络有关,其中一些区域对于成功执行 CET 并非必需。相反,神经心理学研究可能是识别 CET 表现所需的大脑区域的更有前途的研究工具。我们最近开发了 CET 的两个新版本(CET-A 和 CET-B;MacPherson 等人,2014)。我们在有单侧、局灶性、额叶(n = 38)或后叶(n = 22)病变的患者和健康对照者(n = 39)中调查了 CET-A 的整体表现并进行了错误分析。我们发现额叶患者在 CET 上的表现比健康对照组差。我们还发现,额叶患者在 CET-A 上的估计值明显低于后叶患者。这不能用流体智力的损伤来解释。错误分析表明,对于 CET-A,额叶损伤后,极端和非常极端的反应受损。然而,只有非常极端的反应在额叶损伤后比后叶损伤更严重受损,因此代表了除了总体 CET 表现外,仅限制于额叶“执行”损伤的一种测量方法。