• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一家食管癌三级转诊中心实施微创食管切除术。

Implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy in a tertiary referral center for esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Nilsson Magnus, Kamiya Satoshi, Lindblad Mats, Rouvelas Ioannis

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S817-S825. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.04.23.

DOI:10.21037/jtd.2017.04.23
PMID:28815079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5538969/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy remains the gold standard in the curative intent treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. However, this procedure is complex and associated with high risk of complications. In an effort to reduce the postoperative morbidity associated with open esophagectomy various minimally invasive techniques have been introduced and developed during the recent years. The aim of the current study was to present our 4.5-year experience of the gradual implementation of various minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) techniques in our tertiary referral center.

METHODS

From May 2012 a transitional period from conventional open esophagectomy to MIE was initiated. This period was preceded by fellowships and visits to expert centers abroad. Thereafter, a gradual implementation and refinement of the new techniques followed. Technique related data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Between January 1 2011 and December 31 2016 a total of 249 patients underwent an esophagectomy in our unit. Seventy-six cases were performed through a conventional open esophagectomy and 173 by some type of MIE. An increasing utilization of MIE over this time period was seen and finally reached 100% of treatment intentions, during the last 2 years. Ten cases (5.7%) where converted to open approach. A decrease in leak rate, operating time, peroperative bleeding and hospital stay as well as an increasing number of harvested lymph nodes was observed during the implementation period.

CONCLUSIONS

The transition from conventional open esophagectomy to MIE was successful at our center. The implementation was overall safe with good postoperative outcomes, although changes in results required technical modifications over time.

摘要

背景

食管切除术仍然是可切除食管癌根治性治疗的金标准。然而,该手术复杂且并发症风险高。近年来,为了降低与开放性食管切除术相关的术后发病率,已引入并开发了各种微创技术。本研究的目的是介绍我们在三级转诊中心逐步实施各种微创食管切除术(MIE)技术的4.5年经验。

方法

从2012年5月开始了从传统开放性食管切除术到MIE的过渡期。在此期间之前,我们的医生到国外的专家中心进修学习。此后,逐步实施并完善新技术。前瞻性收集技术相关数据。

结果

在2011年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间,我们科室共有249例患者接受了食管切除术。其中76例通过传统开放性食管切除术进行,173例通过某种类型的MIE进行。在此期间,MIE的使用率不断提高,在最后两年最终达到了100%的治疗意向。有10例(5.7%)转为开放手术。在实施期间,观察到渗漏率、手术时间、术中出血和住院时间减少,以及收获的淋巴结数量增加。

结论

在我们中心,从传统开放性食管切除术到MIE的转变是成功的。尽管随着时间的推移,结果的变化需要技术改进,但总体实施是安全的,术后效果良好。

相似文献

1
Implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy in a tertiary referral center for esophageal cancer.在一家食管癌三级转诊中心实施微创食管切除术。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S817-S825. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.04.23.
2
Results of the introduction of a minimally invasive esophagectomy program in a tertiary referral center.引进微创食管切除术项目在三级转诊中心的结果。
J Thorac Dis. 2012 Oct;4(5):467-73. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.09.05.
3
Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.单一癌症中心食管癌微创与开放食管切除术的比较研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(4):747-52.
4
Single center consecutive series cohort study of minimally invasive versus open resection for cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.关于食管癌或胃食管交界癌微创与开放切除术的单中心连续系列队列研究
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Oct 1;31(10). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy027.
5
The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.在高容量中心,微创食管切除术的实施并不影响短期结果。
Anticancer Res. 2013 May;33(5):2085-91.
6
Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.新辅助治疗后开放与微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术的疗效
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1097-103. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.062. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
7
Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer.可切除食管癌的微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术的手术效果
South Asian J Cancer. 2021 Dec 31;10(4):230-235. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730085. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).机器人辅助食管切除术(RAE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗可切除的食管鳞癌:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验的方案(RAMIE 试验,机器人辅助微创食管切除术)。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5799-6.
9
Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience.肿瘤学结局的变化:传统与微创食管切除术的比较,单机构经验
Updates Surg. 2016 Dec;68(4):343-349. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0390-z. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗癌症的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):121-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study from a high-volume center.机器人辅助与传统微创食管切除术:一项来自高容量中心的回顾性队列研究。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 22;19(1):414. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02590-0.
2
Clinical implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的临床应用。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7.
3
Safe Transition from Open to Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer Utilizing Process Management Methodology.利用流程管理方法实现从开放性食管癌切除术到完全微创食管癌切除术的安全过渡。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 26;13(15):4364. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154364.
4
Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study.食管癌微创外科技术与营养恢复:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e058763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058763.
5
Thirty years of esophageal cancer surgery in Oulu University Hospital.奥卢大学医院30年的食管癌手术
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Aug;13(8):4638-4649. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-520.
6
Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.经胸食管癌微创切除术治疗食管癌的微创技术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2020 Oct;4(5):787-803. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50330. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
7
Implementation of minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a western tertiary referral center.在一家西方三级转诊中心实施胃癌的微创胃切除术。
BMC Surg. 2020 Jul 16;20(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00812-w.
8
Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.完全微创食管切除术与杂交微创食管切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Aug 3;33(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa021.
9
Population-based study of anastomotic stricture rates after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy for cancer.基于人群的研究:微创与开放性食管癌切除术术后吻合口狭窄发生率。
BJS Open. 2019 Jun 10;3(5):634-640. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50176. eCollection 2019 Oct.
10
Minimally invasive surgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave's syndrome).自发性食管穿孔(Boerhaave 综合征)的微创外科治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3494-3502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06863-2. Epub 2019 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may increase the risk of severe anastomotic complications after esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis.新辅助放化疗可能会增加食管切除术后行颈部吻合术发生严重吻合口并发症的风险。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 May;401(3):323-31. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1409-0. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
2
Thoracoscopic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy by use of linear stapler-a simplified technique facilitating a minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis operation.使用线性吻合器行胸腔镜下食管胃侧侧吻合术——一种简化技术,有助于开展微创Ivor-Lewis手术
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 May;401(3):315-22. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1396-1. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
3
A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.Ivor-Lewis术式与McKeown微创食管切除术短期疗效的比较。
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2352-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.12.15.
4
Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.胸腔镜-腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术的比较:结局的荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3873-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4692-x. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
5
Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创食管切除术对预防癌症食管切除术后吻合口漏是否有效?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep 4;13:269. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0661-z.
6
Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.与开放食管切除术相比,微创食管切除术后的生活质量和晚期并发症:一项随机试验的结果。
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):1986-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3100-y.
7
Thoracoscopic esophagectomy using prone positioning.采用俯卧位的胸腔镜食管切除术。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;19(6):399-408. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.13-00262. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
8
Refinement of minimally invasive esophagectomy techniques after 15 years of experience.15 年经验后微创食管切除术技术的改进。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Sep;16(9):1768-74. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1950-2. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
9
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.微创与开放手术治疗食管癌的疗效比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.
10
Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review.微创食管切除术(MIE)是否能提供与开放技术相当的肿瘤学结果?一项系统评价。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Mar;16(3):486-94. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1792-3. Epub 2011 Dec 20.