• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可切除食管癌的微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术的手术效果

Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer.

作者信息

Chowdappa Ramachandra, Dharanikota Anvesh, Arjunan Ravi, Althaf Syed, Premalata Chennagiri S, Ranganath Namrata

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

South Asian J Cancer. 2021 Dec 31;10(4):230-235. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730085. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1730085
PMID:34984201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8719958/
Abstract

There is a recent rise in the incidence of esophageal carcinoma in India. Surgical resection with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation is the current treatment modality of choice. Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect many patients who undergo open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) could reduce the pulmonary complications and reduce the postoperative stay. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 114 patients with esophageal cancer in the department of surgical oncology at a tertiary cancer center in South India between January 2019 and March 2020. We included patients with resectable cancer of middle or lower third of the esophagus, and gastroesophageal junction tumors (Siewert I). MIE was performed in 27 patients and 78 patients underwent open esophagectomy (OE). The primary outcome measured was postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher within 30 days. Other outcomes measured include overall mortality within 30 days, intraoperative complications, operative duration and the length of hospital stay. A postoperative complication rate of 18.5% was noted in the MIE group, compared with 41% in the OE group ( = 0.034). Pulmonary complications were noted in 7.4% in the MIE group compared to 25.6% in the OE group ( = 0.044). Postoperative mortality rates, intraoperative complications, and other nonpulmonary postoperative complications were almost similar with MIE as with open esophagectomy. Although the median operative time was more in the MIE group (260 minutes vs. 180 minutes; < 0.0001), the median length of hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing MIE (9 days vs. 12 days; = 0.0001). We found that MIE resulted in lower incidence of postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications. Although, MIE was associated with prolonged operative duration, it resulted in shorter hospital stay.

摘要

印度食管癌的发病率近期有所上升。手术切除联合或不联合新辅助放化疗是目前的首选治疗方式。术后并发症,尤其是肺部并发症,影响着许多接受食管癌开放食管切除术的患者。微创食管切除术(MIE)可减少肺部并发症并缩短术后住院时间。我们对印度南部一家三级癌症中心外科肿瘤学部门2019年1月至2020年3月期间前瞻性收集的114例食管癌患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。我们纳入了食管中下段可切除癌患者以及胃食管交界部肿瘤(Siewert I型)患者。27例患者接受了MIE,78例患者接受了开放食管切除术(OE)。主要观察指标为30天内Clavien-Dindo II级或更高等级的术后并发症。其他观察指标包括30天内的总体死亡率、术中并发症、手术时长和住院时间。MIE组术后并发症发生率为18.5%,而OE组为41%(P = 0.034)。MIE组肺部并发症发生率为7.4%,而OE组为25.6%(P = 0.044)。MIE组的术后死亡率、术中并发症以及其他非肺部术后并发症与开放食管切除术组几乎相似。虽然MIE组的中位手术时间更长(260分钟对180分钟;P < 0.0001),但接受MIE的患者中位住院时间更短(9天对12天;P = 0.0001)。我们发现MIE导致术后并发症发生率更低,尤其是肺部并发症。虽然MIE与手术时间延长有关,但它导致住院时间缩短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c90/8719958/1d1d9949fc97/10-1055-s-0041-1730085_10145_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c90/8719958/1d1d9949fc97/10-1055-s-0041-1730085_10145_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c90/8719958/1d1d9949fc97/10-1055-s-0041-1730085_10145_01.jpg

相似文献

1
Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer.可切除食管癌的微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术的手术效果
South Asian J Cancer. 2021 Dec 31;10(4):230-235. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730085. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.食管癌颈部吻合术的微创与开放食管切除术比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 8;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01182-3.
3
Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.食管癌合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者行微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术后并发症及长期生存率的比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 4;12:934950. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.934950. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.手术入路对食管癌食管切除术围手术期和长期结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1892-1900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5881-6. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
5
Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.单一癌症中心食管癌微创与开放食管切除术的比较研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(4):747-52.
6
Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术相比,可减轻食管癌患者的术后炎症反应,提高生存率:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4443-4450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6187-z. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
7
Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.机器人辅助和传统的微创食管切除术与杂交和开胸经胸食管切除术相比,具有更好的术后结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;48(4):776-782. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.121. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
8
Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?微创食管切除术对老年食管癌患者有益吗?
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):925-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3753-x. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
9
Minimally Invasive Open Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer or Cancer of the Gastroesophageal Junction: Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-term Survival Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis.微创经左胸入路 Ivor-Lewis 食管癌切除术或胃食管结合部癌切除术:采用倾向评分匹配分析比较术后结果和长期生存。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Jul;41(7):3499-3510. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15137.
10
Single center consecutive series cohort study of minimally invasive versus open resection for cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.关于食管癌或胃食管交界癌微创与开放切除术的单中心连续系列队列研究
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Oct 1;31(10). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy027.

引用本文的文献

1
Students and physicians differ in perception of quality of life in patients with tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract.学生和医生对患有上消化道肿瘤患者的生活质量认知存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 24;14(1):9460. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59350-7.
2
Utility of single-port laparoscopic retrograde gastric mobilization during McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 2-year experience with 120 cases in a single institution.单孔腹腔镜下逆行胃游离术在食管癌McKeown食管切除术中的应用:单中心120例患者的2年经验
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Oct;14(10):3983-3991. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1193.

本文引用的文献

1
Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.杂交微创食管癌切除术。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):152-162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805101.
2
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术治疗可切除食管癌的Meta分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec 8;14(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1062-7.
3
Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.微创食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的Meta分析
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Oct 31;9:6751-6762. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S112105. eCollection 2016.
4
Is Centralization Needed for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Patients With Low Operative Risk?: A Nationwide Study.低手术风险的食管癌和胃癌患者需要集中治疗吗?一项全国性研究。
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):823-830. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001768.
5
Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes.食管癌的全微创食管切除术:手术方法及结果
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Sep;401(6):747-56. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1469-1. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
6
Minimally Invasive Techniques and Hybrid Operations for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌的微创技术与杂交手术
Viszeralmedizin. 2015 Oct;31(5):331-6. doi: 10.1159/000438661. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
7
Does minimally invasive oesophagectomy provide a benefit in hospital length of stay when compared with open oesophagectomy?与开放性食管切除术相比,微创食管切除术在缩短住院时间方面是否具有优势?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;22(3):360-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv339. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
8
Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.胸腔镜-腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术的比较:结局的荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3873-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4692-x. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
9
Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.微创食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的疗效比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Mar;87(3):165-170. doi: 10.1111/ans.13334. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
10
Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创食管切除术对预防癌症食管切除术后吻合口漏是否有效?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep 4;13:269. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0661-z.