• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估互联网上垂体腺瘤可用信息质量时患者与医疗保健专业人员观点的比较

A COMPARISON OF PATIENT AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIEWS WHEN ASSESSING QUALITY OF INFORMATION ON PITUITARY ADENOMA AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET.

作者信息

Druce Irena, Williams Chantal, Baggoo Carolyn, Keely Erin, Malcolm Janine

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2017 Oct;23(10):1217-1222. doi: 10.4158/EP171892.OR. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

DOI:10.4158/EP171892.OR
PMID:28816540
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients are increasingly turning to the internet to seek reliable sources of health information and desire guidance in assessing the quality of information as healthcare becomes progressively more complex. Pituitary adenomas are a rare, diverse group of tumors associated with increased mortality and morbidity whose management requires a multidisciplinary approach. As such, patients with this disorder are often searching for additional sources of healthcare information. We undertook a study to assess the quality of information available on the internet for patients with pituitary adenoma.

METHODS

After exclusion, 42 websites were identified based on a search engine query with various search terms. Each website was assessed in triplicate: once by a health professional, once by a simulated patient, and once by a patient who had a pituitary adenoma and underwent medical and surgical treatment. The assessment tools included a content-specific questionnaire, the DISCERN tool, and the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool. The readability of the information was assessed with the Flesch-Kincaid grade level.

RESULTS

We found that the overall quality of information on pituitary adenoma on the internet was variable and written at a high grade level. Correlation between the different assessors was poor, indicating that there may be differences in how healthcare professionals and patients view healthcare information.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the importance of assessment of the health information by groups of the intended user to ensure the needs of that population are met. Abbreviation: EQIP = Ensuring Quality Information for Patients.

摘要

目的

随着医疗保健日益复杂,患者越来越多地转向互联网寻求可靠的健康信息来源,并希望在评估信息质量方面得到指导。垂体腺瘤是一组罕见且多样的肿瘤,与死亡率和发病率增加相关,其治疗需要多学科方法。因此,患有这种疾病的患者经常在寻找更多的医疗保健信息来源。我们开展了一项研究,以评估互联网上可供垂体腺瘤患者使用的信息质量。

方法

排除相关内容后,基于使用各种搜索词的搜索引擎查询,确定了42个网站。每个网站由一名医疗专业人员、一名模拟患者和一名患有垂体腺瘤并接受过药物和手术治疗的患者分别进行三次评估。评估工具包括一份特定内容问卷、DISCERN工具和“为患者确保质量信息”工具。使用弗莱什-金凯德年级水平来评估信息的可读性。

结果

我们发现,互联网上关于垂体腺瘤的信息总体质量参差不齐,且写作水平较高。不同评估者之间的相关性较差,这表明医疗专业人员和患者对医疗保健信息的看法可能存在差异。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了目标用户群体对健康信息进行评估的重要性,以确保满足该群体的需求。缩写:EQIP = 为患者确保质量信息。

相似文献

1
A COMPARISON OF PATIENT AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIEWS WHEN ASSESSING QUALITY OF INFORMATION ON PITUITARY ADENOMA AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET.评估互联网上垂体腺瘤可用信息质量时患者与医疗保健专业人员观点的比较
Endocr Pract. 2017 Oct;23(10):1217-1222. doi: 10.4158/EP171892.OR. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
2
Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.评估有关吞咽障碍治疗的互联网信息来源的质量和可读性。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Mar;96(3):128-138. doi: 10.1177/014556131709600312.
3
Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis.基于互联网的口臭信息的质量和可读性。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Mar;125(3):215-222. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
4
An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.评估关于尿道下裂治疗的在线健康信息的可读性、质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):40.e1-40.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.评估失败性脊柱手术后在线资源的质量、内容和可读性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
6
The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.互联网上结直肠癌信息的质量和可读性。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):410-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
7
Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.关于肾癌和膀胱癌的网站的准确性与可读性。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):926-944. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1181-z.
8
Tinnitus information online - does it ring true?网上的耳鸣信息——可信吗?
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Nov;132(11):984-989. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118001792. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
9
Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.基于网络的口腔白斑治疗信息——质量与可读性。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2016 Sep;45(8):617-20. doi: 10.1111/jop.12459. Epub 2016 May 28.
10
A North American perspective of content and quality of websites in the English language on childhood-onset lupus erythematosus.北美视角下关于儿童期起病的红斑狼疮的英文网站内容与质量
Lupus. 2018 Apr;27(5):762-770. doi: 10.1177/0961203317746246. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of user behavior on the website of a university eye hospital in Germany.德国一家大学眼科医院网站上的用户行为分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21348. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021348.
2
Health care professional perceptions of online information and support for young people with cancer in the United Kingdom.英国医疗保健专业人员对癌症青少年在线信息及支持的看法。
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2019 Aug 29;10:103-116. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S211142. eCollection 2019.