Blank Melissa D, Breland Alison B, Cobb Caroline O, Spindle Tory, Ramôa Carolina, Eissenberg Thomas
Assistant Professor, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
Assistant Professor, Virginia Commonwealth University, Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Richmond, VA.
Tob Regul Sci. 2016 Oct;2(4):426-439. doi: 10.18001/TRS.2.4.12.
Evaluating electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) in the clinical laboratory is critical to understanding their effects. However, laboratory evaluation of ECIGs can be challenging, as they are a novel, varied, and evolving class of products. The objective of this paper is to describe some methodological challenges to the clinical laboratory evaluation of ECIGs.
The authors gathered information about challenges involved in the laboratory evaluation of ECIGs. Challenges were categorized and solutions provided when possible.
Methods used to study combustible cigarettes may need to be adapted to account for ECIG novelty and differences within the class. Challenges to ECIG evaluation can include issues related to 1) identification of ECIG devices and liquids, 2) determination of short -term ECIG abstinence, 3) measurement of use behavior, and 4) assessment of dependence. These challenges are discussed, and some suggestions to inform ECIG evaluation using clinical laboratory methods are provided.
Awareness of challenges and developing, validating, and reporting methods used to address them aids interpretation of results and replication efforts, thus enhancing the rigor of science used to protect public health through appropriate, empirically-based, ECIG regulation.
在临床实验室中评估电子烟对于理解其影响至关重要。然而,对电子烟进行实验室评估可能具有挑战性,因为它们是一类新颖、多样且不断发展的产品。本文的目的是描述电子烟临床实验室评估面临的一些方法学挑战。
作者收集了有关电子烟实验室评估中所涉及挑战的信息。对挑战进行了分类,并在可能的情况下提供了解决方案。
用于研究可燃香烟的方法可能需要进行调整,以考虑到电子烟的新颖性以及该类别产品内部的差异。电子烟评估面临的挑战可能包括与以下方面相关的问题:1)电子烟装置和烟液的识别;2)短期电子烟戒断的确定;3)使用行为的测量;4)依赖性评估。对这些挑战进行了讨论,并提供了一些建议,以指导使用临床实验室方法进行电子烟评估。
意识到挑战并开发、验证和报告用于应对这些挑战的方法,有助于对结果进行解释和重复研究,从而通过基于实证的适当电子烟监管来加强用于保护公众健康的科学严谨性。