• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用改进的DEMATEL方法确定综合医院管理的关键绩效指标

Identifying Key Performance Indicators for Holistic Hospital Management with a Modified DEMATEL Approach.

作者信息

Si Sheng-Li, You Xiao-Yue, Liu Hu-Chen, Huang Jia

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.

Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FS, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 19;14(8):934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080934.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14080934
PMID:28825613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5580636/
Abstract

Performance analysis is an important way for hospitals to achieve higher efficiency and effectiveness in providing services to their customers. The performance of the healthcare system can be measured by many indicators, but it is difficult to improve them simultaneously due to the limited resources. A feasible way is to identify the central and influential indicators to improve healthcare performance in a stepwise manner. In this paper, we propose a hybrid multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approach to identify key performance indicators (KPIs) for holistic hospital management. First, through integrating evidential reasoning approach and interval 2-tuple linguistic variables, various assessments of performance indicators provided by healthcare experts are modeled. Then, the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique is adopted to build an interactive network and visualize the causal relationships between the performance indicators. Finally, an empirical case study is provided to demonstrate the proposed approach for improving the efficiency of healthcare management. The results show that "accidents/adverse events", "nosocomial infection", ''incidents/errors", "number of operations/procedures" are significant influential indicators. Also, the indicators of "length of stay", "bed occupancy" and "financial measures" play important roles in performance evaluation of the healthcare organization. The proposed decision making approach could be considered as a reference for healthcare administrators to enhance the performance of their healthcare institutions.

摘要

绩效分析是医院在为客户提供服务时实现更高效率和效能的重要途径。医疗系统的绩效可以通过许多指标来衡量,但由于资源有限,很难同时提高这些指标。一种可行的方法是识别核心和有影响力的指标,以逐步提高医疗绩效。在本文中,我们提出了一种混合多准则决策(MCDM)方法,用于识别整体医院管理的关键绩效指标(KPI)。首先,通过整合证据推理方法和区间二元语言变量,对医疗专家提供的绩效指标的各种评估进行建模。然后,采用决策试验与评价实验室(DEMATEL)技术构建交互网络,并可视化绩效指标之间的因果关系。最后,通过一个实证案例研究来证明所提出的提高医疗管理效率的方法。结果表明,“事故/不良事件”、“医院感染”、“事件/错误”、“手术/操作数量”是显著的有影响力指标。此外,“住院时间”、“床位占用率”和“财务指标”在医疗机构的绩效评估中也起着重要作用。所提出的决策方法可为医疗管理人员提高其医疗机构的绩效提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ca/5580636/d2369c417ec7/ijerph-14-00934-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ca/5580636/f288fa9f2972/ijerph-14-00934-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ca/5580636/d2369c417ec7/ijerph-14-00934-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ca/5580636/f288fa9f2972/ijerph-14-00934-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ca/5580636/d2369c417ec7/ijerph-14-00934-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Key Performance Indicators for Holistic Hospital Management with a Modified DEMATEL Approach.运用改进的DEMATEL方法确定综合医院管理的关键绩效指标
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 19;14(8):934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080934.
2
Identification of Key Performance Indicators for Hospital Management Using an Extended Hesitant Linguistic DEMATEL Approach.使用扩展的犹豫语言DEMATEL方法识别医院管理的关键绩效指标
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Dec 25;8(1):7. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010007.
3
Identification of key factors in consumers' adoption behavior of intelligent medical terminals based on a hybrid modified MADM model for product improvement.基于混合改进多属性决策模型的智能医疗终端消费者采纳行为关键因素识别以进行产品改进
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:68-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard.构建具有平衡计分卡关键绩效指标的银行机构战略地图。
Eval Program Plann. 2012 Aug;35(3):303-20. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.009. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
5
Prioritizing enablers for service quality in healthcare sector - a DEMATEL approach.优先考虑医疗保健部门服务质量的促成因素 - 一种 DEMATEL 方法。
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Mar 8;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2021-0222.
6
Organizational decision to adopt hospital information system: an empirical investigation in the case of Malaysian public hospitals.采用医院信息系统的组织决策:以马来西亚公立医院为例的实证研究
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Mar;84(3):166-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
7
A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach.一种基于平衡计分卡方法的用于研究与技术组织绩效评估的新型混合多准则决策模型。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Oct;58:125-140. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
8
Green material selection for sustainability: A hybrid MCDM approach.可持续性的绿色材料选择:一种混合多准则决策方法。
PLoS One. 2017 May 12;12(5):e0177578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177578. eCollection 2017.
9
Analyzing the key performance indicators of circular supply chains by hybrid fuzzy cognitive mapping and Fuzzy DEMATEL: evidence from healthcare sector.基于混合模糊认知图和模糊DEMATEL的循环供应链关键绩效指标分析:来自医疗保健部门的证据
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022 Jul 4:1-27. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02535-9.
10
Evaluating biometrics by using a hybrid MCDM model.使用混合 MCDM 模型评估生物识别技术。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20749. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00180-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Crucial key performance indicators for hospital evaluation: A scoping review.医院评估的关键关键绩效指标:一项范围综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 May 30;14:195. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_2102_23. eCollection 2025.
2
COVID-19 critical success factors in Indian healthcare industry-A DEMATEL approach.印度医疗行业中COVID-19的关键成功因素——一种决策试验与评价实验室方法
J Multi Criteria Decis Anal. 2022 Jan-Apr;29(1-2):135-149. doi: 10.1002/mcda.1763. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Statistical Analysis and Forecasts of Performance Indicators in the Romanian Healthcare System.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance indicators: healthcare professionals' views.绩效指标:医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 Aug 8;29(7):801-15. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2015-0142.
2
Health-Care Waste Treatment Technology Selection Using the Interval 2-Tuple Induced TOPSIS Method.基于区间二元组诱导TOPSIS法的医疗废物处理技术选择
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jun 4;13(6):562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13060562.
3
A national system for monitoring the performance of hospitals in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚的医院绩效监测国家系统。
罗马尼亚医疗体系绩效指标的统计分析与预测
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 7;13(2):102. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020102.
4
Key performance indicators of hospital supply chain: a systematic review.医院供应链的关键绩效指标:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1610. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11954-5.
5
Hospital performance evaluation indicators: a scoping review.医院绩效评价指标:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 1;24(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10940-1.
6
Identification and Prioritization of Critical Factors Affecting the Performance of Iranian Public Hospitals Using the Best-Worst Method: A Prospective Study.采用最佳最差法识别和确定影响伊朗公立医院绩效的关键因素并对其进行排序:一项前瞻性研究。
Iran J Med Sci. 2022 Nov;47(6):549-557. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2021.91256.2237.
7
Analyzing the key performance indicators of circular supply chains by hybrid fuzzy cognitive mapping and Fuzzy DEMATEL: evidence from healthcare sector.基于混合模糊认知图和模糊DEMATEL的循环供应链关键绩效指标分析:来自医疗保健部门的证据
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022 Jul 4:1-27. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02535-9.
8
Selecting the most suitable organizational structure for hospitals: an integrated fuzzy FUCOM-MARCOS method.为医院选择最合适的组织结构:一种集成模糊FUCOM-MARCOS方法
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Jun 27;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00362-3.
9
Macroeconomic and Social Indicators to Launch the PM-Based VBHC Model in the Healthcare System in Poland.启动波兰医疗体系基于总理的 VBHC 模型的宏观经济和社会指标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 2;19(3):1712. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031712.
10
Identifying the key factors of subsidiary supervision and management using an innovative hybrid architecture in a big data environment.在大数据环境下,使用创新的混合架构识别子公司监督管理的关键因素。
Financ Innov. 2021;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40854-020-00219-9. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Oct 1;93(10):719-726. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.151399. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
4
Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators.迈向可付诸行动的卫生系统绩效国际比较:经合组织框架和质量指标的专家修订
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Apr;27(2):137-46. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv004. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
5
Implementation of renal key performance indicators: promoting improved clinical practice.肾脏关键绩效指标的实施:促进临床实践的改善
Nephrology (Carlton). 2015 Mar;20(3):184-93. doi: 10.1111/nep.12366.
6
Conceptual framework for holistic dialysis management based on key performance indicators.基于关键绩效指标的整体透析管理概念框架。
Ther Apher Dial. 2013 Oct;17(5):532-50. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12019. Epub 2013 Feb 17.
7
A theoretical framework for holistic hospital management in the Japanese healthcare context.日本医疗背景下的整体医院管理理论框架。
Health Policy. 2013 Nov;113(1-2):160-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
8
Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard.构建具有平衡计分卡关键绩效指标的银行机构战略地图。
Eval Program Plann. 2012 Aug;35(3):303-20. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.009. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
9
Design, implementation and scaling up of the balanced scorecard for hospitals in Lebanon: policy coherence and application lessons for low and middle income countries.黎巴嫩医院平衡计分卡的设计、实施和推广:政策一致性及对中低收入国家的应用经验。
Health Policy. 2011 Dec;103(2-3):305-14. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
10
Designing a balanced scorecard for a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan: a modified Delphi group exercise.为巴基斯坦一家三级保健医院设计平衡计分卡:一项经修正的德尔菲小组演练。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;25(1):74-90. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1004.