Jones Marian Moser, Roy Kevin
Department of Family Science, University of Maryland School of Public Health, 1142W School of Public Health Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Department of Family Science, University of Maryland School of Public Health, 1142T School of Public Health Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Oct;21(10):1853-1860. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2354-4.
Purpose This article offers constructive commentary on The Life Course Health and Development Model (LCHD) as an organizing framework for MCH research. Description The LCHD has recently been proposed as an organizing framework for MCH research. This model integrates biomedical, biopsychosocial, and life course frameworks, to explain how "individual health trajectories" develop over time. In this article, we propose that the LCHD can improve its relevance to MCH policy and practice by: (1) placing individual health trajectories within the context of family health trajectories, which unfold within communities and societies, over historical and generational time; and (2) placing greater weight on the social determinants that shape health development trajectories of individuals and families to produce greater or lesser health equity. Assessment We argue that emphasizing these nested, historically specific social contexts in life course models will enrich study design and data analysis for future developmental science research, will make the LCHD model more relevant in shaping MCH policy and interventions, and will guard against its application as a deterministic framework. Specific ways to measure these and examples of how they can be integrated into the LCHD model are articulated. Conclusion Research applying the LCHD should incorporate the specific family and socio-historical contexts in which development occurs to serve as a useful basis for policy and interventions. Future longitudinal studies of maternal and child health should include collection of time-dependent data related to family environment and other social determinants of health, and analyze the impact of historical events and trends on specific cohorts.
目的 本文对生命历程健康与发展模型(LCHD)作为妇幼保健研究的组织框架提供建设性评论。
描述 LCHD最近被提议作为妇幼保健研究的组织框架。该模型整合了生物医学、生物心理社会和生命历程框架,以解释“个体健康轨迹”如何随时间发展。在本文中,我们提出LCHD可以通过以下方式提高其与妇幼保健政策和实践的相关性:(1)将个体健康轨迹置于家庭健康轨迹的背景下,家庭健康轨迹在社区和社会中,跨越历史和代际时间展开;(2)更加重视塑造个体和家庭健康发展轨迹以产生或大或小的健康公平性的社会决定因素。
评估 我们认为,在生命历程模型中强调这些嵌套的、具有历史特定性的社会背景将丰富未来发展科学研究的研究设计和数据分析,将使LCHD模型在塑造妇幼保健政策和干预措施方面更具相关性,并将防止其作为一个决定论框架应用。阐述了衡量这些因素的具体方法以及将它们整合到LCHD模型中的示例。
结论 应用LCHD的研究应纳入发展发生的特定家庭和社会历史背景,作为政策和干预措施的有用基础。未来关于母婴健康的纵向研究应包括收集与家庭环境和其他健康社会决定因素相关的随时间变化的数据,并分析历史事件和趋势对特定队列的影响。