Suppr超能文献

工作记忆对多个目标的准确性受到奖励预期和刺激对比度的驱动,并且具有不同的时程。

Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses.

机构信息

Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts & Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Neuromodulation & Behaviour, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts & Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 22;7(1):9082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08608-4.

Abstract

The richness of sensory input dictates that the brain must prioritize and select information for further processing and storage in working memory. Stimulus salience and reward expectations influence this prioritization but their relative contributions and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we investigate how the quality of working memory for multiple stimuli is determined by priority during encoding and later memory phases. Selective attention could, for instance, act as the primary gating mechanism when stimuli are still visible. Alternatively, observers might still be able to shift priorities across memories during maintenance or retrieval. To distinguish between these possibilities, we investigated how and when reward cues determine working memory accuracy and found that they were only effective during memory encoding. Previously learned, but currently non-predictive, color-reward associations had a similar influence, which gradually weakened without reinforcement. Finally, we show that bottom-up salience, manipulated through varying stimulus contrast, influences memory accuracy during encoding with a fundamentally different time-course than top-down reward cues. While reward-based effects required long stimulus presentation, the influence of contrast was strongest with brief presentations. Our results demonstrate how memory resources are distributed over memory targets and implicates selective attention as a main gating mechanism between sensory and memory systems.

摘要

感觉输入的丰富性决定了大脑必须对信息进行优先级排序,并选择将其进一步处理和存储在工作记忆中。刺激的显著度和奖励预期会影响这种优先级排序,但它们的相对贡献和潜在机制仍不清楚。在这里,我们研究了在编码和后期记忆阶段,优先级如何决定多种刺激的工作记忆质量。例如,选择性注意在刺激仍然可见时可能是主要的门控机制。或者,观察者在保持或检索期间仍然可以跨记忆转移优先级。为了区分这些可能性,我们研究了奖励线索如何以及何时确定工作记忆准确性,发现它们仅在记忆编码期间有效。以前学习但当前非预测性的颜色奖励关联具有相似的影响,并且在没有强化的情况下逐渐减弱。最后,我们表明,通过改变刺激对比度来操纵的自下而上的显著性会在编码过程中影响记忆准确性,其时间进程与自上而下的奖励线索根本不同。虽然基于奖励的效应需要长时间呈现刺激,但对比度的影响在短暂呈现时最强。我们的研究结果表明了记忆资源如何在记忆目标之间分配,并暗示选择性注意是感觉和记忆系统之间的主要门控机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f8/5567292/11d6c1eb8ce9/41598_2017_8608_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验