Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts & Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neuromodulation & Behaviour, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts & Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 22;7(1):9082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08608-4.
The richness of sensory input dictates that the brain must prioritize and select information for further processing and storage in working memory. Stimulus salience and reward expectations influence this prioritization but their relative contributions and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we investigate how the quality of working memory for multiple stimuli is determined by priority during encoding and later memory phases. Selective attention could, for instance, act as the primary gating mechanism when stimuli are still visible. Alternatively, observers might still be able to shift priorities across memories during maintenance or retrieval. To distinguish between these possibilities, we investigated how and when reward cues determine working memory accuracy and found that they were only effective during memory encoding. Previously learned, but currently non-predictive, color-reward associations had a similar influence, which gradually weakened without reinforcement. Finally, we show that bottom-up salience, manipulated through varying stimulus contrast, influences memory accuracy during encoding with a fundamentally different time-course than top-down reward cues. While reward-based effects required long stimulus presentation, the influence of contrast was strongest with brief presentations. Our results demonstrate how memory resources are distributed over memory targets and implicates selective attention as a main gating mechanism between sensory and memory systems.
感觉输入的丰富性决定了大脑必须对信息进行优先级排序,并选择将其进一步处理和存储在工作记忆中。刺激的显著度和奖励预期会影响这种优先级排序,但它们的相对贡献和潜在机制仍不清楚。在这里,我们研究了在编码和后期记忆阶段,优先级如何决定多种刺激的工作记忆质量。例如,选择性注意在刺激仍然可见时可能是主要的门控机制。或者,观察者在保持或检索期间仍然可以跨记忆转移优先级。为了区分这些可能性,我们研究了奖励线索如何以及何时确定工作记忆准确性,发现它们仅在记忆编码期间有效。以前学习但当前非预测性的颜色奖励关联具有相似的影响,并且在没有强化的情况下逐渐减弱。最后,我们表明,通过改变刺激对比度来操纵的自下而上的显著性会在编码过程中影响记忆准确性,其时间进程与自上而下的奖励线索根本不同。虽然基于奖励的效应需要长时间呈现刺激,但对比度的影响在短暂呈现时最强。我们的研究结果表明了记忆资源如何在记忆目标之间分配,并暗示选择性注意是感觉和记忆系统之间的主要门控机制。