• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超出边界处方:存在剂量限制结构时正确靶剂量和肿瘤控制的概率

Beyond the margin recipe: the probability of correct target dosage and tumor control in the presence of a dose limiting structure.

作者信息

Witte Marnix G, Sonke Jan-Jakob, Siebers Jeffrey, Deasy Joseph O, van Herk Marcel

机构信息

The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2017 Sep 20;62(19):7874-7888. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa87fe.

DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/aa87fe
PMID:28832334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5796411/
Abstract

In the past, hypothetical spherical target volumes and ideally conformal dose distributions were analyzed to establish the safety of planning target volume (PTV) margins. In this work we extended these models to estimate how alternative methods of shaping dose distributions could lead to clinical improvements. Based on a spherical clinical target volume (CTV) and Gaussian distributions of systematic and random geometrical uncertainties, idealized 3D dose distributions were optimized to exhibit specific stochastic properties. A nearby spherical organ at risk (OAR) was introduced to explore the benefit of non-spherical dose distributions. Optimizing for the same minimum dose safety criterion as implied by the generally accepted use of a PTV, the extent of the high dose region in one direction could be reduced by half provided that dose in other directions is sufficiently compensated. Further reduction of this unilateral dosimetric margin decreased the target dose confidence, however the actual minimum CTV dose at 90% confidence typically exceeded the minimum PTV dose by 20% of prescription. Incorporation of smooth dose-effect relations within the optimization led to more concentrated dose distributions compared to the use of a PTV, with an improved balance between the probability of tumor cell kill and the risk of geometrical miss, and lower dose to surrounding tissues. Tumor control rate improvements in excess of 20% were found to be common for equal integral dose, while at the same time evading a nearby OAR. These results were robust against uncertainties in dose-effect relations and target heterogeneity, and did not depend on 'shoulders' or 'horns' in the dose distributions.

摘要

过去,人们通过分析假设的球形靶区体积和理想的适形剂量分布来确定计划靶区(PTV)边界的安全性。在这项工作中,我们扩展了这些模型,以估计剂量分布塑形的替代方法如何能带来临床改善。基于球形临床靶区体积(CTV)以及系统和随机几何不确定性的高斯分布,对理想化的三维剂量分布进行优化,使其呈现特定的随机特性。引入一个附近的球形危及器官(OAR)来探索非球形剂量分布的益处。在与普遍接受的PTV使用所隐含的相同最小剂量安全标准下进行优化,如果其他方向的剂量得到充分补偿,那么高剂量区在一个方向上的范围可以减少一半。进一步减小这种单侧剂量边界会降低靶区剂量的可信度,然而在90%可信度下实际的最小CTV剂量通常比最小PTV剂量超出处方剂量的20%。与使用PTV相比,在优化过程中纳入平滑的剂量效应关系会导致剂量分布更加集中,在肿瘤细胞杀伤概率和几何误差风险之间实现更好的平衡,并且对周围组织的剂量更低。发现在相同积分剂量下,肿瘤控制率提高超过20%是常见的,同时避开附近的OAR。这些结果对于剂量效应关系和靶区异质性的不确定性具有鲁棒性,并且不依赖于剂量分布中的“肩部”或“角部”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f6/5796411/511b96702ad3/nihms931419f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f6/5796411/3e7c97e7ed17/nihms931419f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f6/5796411/cd2208b80844/nihms931419f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f6/5796411/14ee75277705/nihms931419f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f6/5796411/511b96702ad3/nihms931419f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f6/5796411/3e7c97e7ed17/nihms931419f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f6/5796411/cd2208b80844/nihms931419f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f6/5796411/14ee75277705/nihms931419f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f6/5796411/511b96702ad3/nihms931419f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Beyond the margin recipe: the probability of correct target dosage and tumor control in the presence of a dose limiting structure.超出边界处方:存在剂量限制结构时正确靶剂量和肿瘤控制的概率
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Sep 20;62(19):7874-7888. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa87fe.
2
Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.覆盖优化计划:基于剂量覆盖直方图标准的概率治疗计划。
Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):550-63. doi: 10.1118/1.3273063.
3
Loss of local control due to tumor displacement as a function of margin size, dose-response slope, and number of fractions.由于肿瘤移位导致局部控制丢失,这与边缘大小、剂量反应斜率和分割次数有关。
Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041715. doi: 10.1118/1.4795131.
4
Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: how much margin is needed?放射治疗的计划靶区:需要多少边界?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jul 15;44(5):1165-70. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00117-0.
5
Isotoxic dose escalation in the treatment of lung cancer by means of heterogeneous dose distributions in the presence of respiratory motion.在呼吸运动存在的情况下,通过不均匀剂量分布对肺癌进行等毒性剂量递增治疗。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 1;81(3):849-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.001. Epub 2011 May 11.
6
A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.一种在调强放射治疗优化中纳入系统不确定性的新方法。
Med Phys. 2005 Aug;32(8):2567-79. doi: 10.1118/1.1954161.
7
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh.大腿软组织肉瘤的调强放射治疗
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 1;59(3):752-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.11.037.
8
Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.通过覆盖概率将几何不确定性纳入放射治疗治疗计划中。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Mar 1;43(4):905-19. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00468-4.
9
Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.使用靶向稀疏优化进行剂量塑形。
Med Phys. 2013 Jul;40(7):071711. doi: 10.1118/1.4808363.
10
Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.评估蒙特卡罗算法在接受立体定向体部放射治疗的周围型肺癌患者中符合 RTOG 0915 剂量学标准的应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 8;17(3):277-293. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6077.

引用本文的文献

1
Data Science Opportunities To Improve Radiotherapy Planning and Clinical Decision Making.数据科学在改善放射治疗计划和临床决策方面的机遇。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2024 Oct;34(4):379-394. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.07.012.
2
Biologically Targeted Radiation Therapy: Incorporating Patient-Specific Hypoxia Data Derived from Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.生物靶向放射治疗:整合源自定量磁共振成像的患者特异性缺氧数据
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 29;13(19):4897. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194897.
3
Cranial organs at risk delineation: heterogenous practices in radiotherapy planning.颅脑危险器官勾画:放疗计划中的混杂实践。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb 4;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01756-y.
4
Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment.评估肺癌调强放疗中针对特定射束的 PTV 的 OAR 剂量节省和计划稳健性。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 17;15(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01686-1.
5
Dose escalation in the definite target volume.在明确的靶区内增加剂量。
Med Phys. 2020 Jul;47(7):3174-3183. doi: 10.1002/mp.14164. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Novel adaptive beam-dependent margins for additional OAR sparing.新型自适应剂量适应技术,用于额外的危及器官保护。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Oct 29;63(21):215019. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae658.

本文引用的文献

1
The Price of Target Dose Uniformity.靶剂量均匀性的代价。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 15;96(4):913-914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.07.033. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
2
The scenario-based generalization of radiation therapy margins.基于场景的放射治疗边界的概括。
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Mar 7;61(5):2067-82. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/2067. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
3
Modelling the interplay between hypoxia and proliferation in radiotherapy tumour response.建立模型研究放疗肿瘤反应中缺氧与增殖的相互作用。
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jul 21;58(14):4897-919. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/14/4897. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
4
Probabilistic objective functions for margin-less IMRT planning.无边界调强放射治疗计划的概率目标函数。
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jun 7;58(11):3563-80. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/11/3563. Epub 2013 May 2.
5
Pathologic validation of a model based on diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for tumor delineation in the prostate peripheral zone.基于扩散加权成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像的前列腺周围区肿瘤勾画模型的病理验证。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):e537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.021. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
6
Dealing with geometric uncertainties in dose painting by numbers: introducing the ΔVH.处理剂量雕刻中的几何不确定性:引入 ΔVH。
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Sep;100(3):402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.028. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
7
Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.覆盖优化计划:基于剂量覆盖直方图标准的概率治疗计划。
Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):550-63. doi: 10.1118/1.3273063.
8
IMRT optimization including random and systematic geometric errors based on the expectation of TCP and NTCP.基于肿瘤控制概率(TCP)和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)预期的调强放射治疗(IMRT)优化,包括随机和系统几何误差。
Med Phys. 2007 Sep;34(9):3544-55. doi: 10.1118/1.2760027.
9
Risk-adaptive optimization: selective boosting of high-risk tumor subvolumes.风险适应性优化:高风险肿瘤子体积的选择性增强
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Dec 1;66(5):1528-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.032.
10
Robust treatment planning for intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer based on coverage probabilities.基于覆盖概率的前列腺癌调强放射治疗稳健治疗计划
Radiother Oncol. 2006 Jan;78(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.09.005. Epub 2005 Oct 10.