Pries Lotta-Katrin, Guloksuz Sinan, Menne-Lothmann Claudia, Decoster Jeroen, van Winkel Ruud, Collip Dina, Delespaul Philippe, De Hert Marc, Derom Catherine, Thiery Evert, Jacobs Nele, Wichers Marieke, Simons Claudia J P, Rutten Bart P F, van Os Jim
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0183695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183695. eCollection 2017.
An association between white noise speech illusion and psychotic symptoms has been reported in patients and their relatives. This supports the theory that bottom-up and top-down perceptual processes are involved in the mechanisms underlying perceptual abnormalities. However, findings in nonclinical populations have been conflicting.
The aim of this study was to examine the association between white noise speech illusion and subclinical expression of psychotic symptoms in a nonclinical sample. Findings were compared to previous results to investigate potential methodology dependent differences.
In a general population adolescent and young adult twin sample (n = 704), the association between white noise speech illusion and subclinical psychotic experiences, using the Structured Interview for Schizotypy-Revised (SIS-R) and the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE), was analyzed using multilevel logistic regression analyses.
Perception of any white noise speech illusion was not associated with either positive or negative schizotypy in the general population twin sample, using the method by Galdos et al. (2011) (positive: ORadjusted: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.6-1.12, p = 0.217; negative: ORadjusted: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.56-1.02, p = 0.065) and the method by Catalan et al. (2014) (positive: ORadjusted: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.79-1.57, p = 0.557). No association was found between CAPE scores and speech illusion (ORadjusted: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.88-1.79, p = 0.220). For the Catalan et al. (2014) but not the Galdos et al. (2011) method, a negative association was apparent between positive schizotypy and speech illusion with positive or negative affective valence (ORadjusted: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.81, p = 0.008).
Contrary to findings in clinical populations, white noise speech illusion may not be associated with psychosis proneness in nonclinical populations.
在患者及其亲属中,已报告白噪声言语错觉与精神症状之间存在关联。这支持了自下而上和自上而下的感知过程参与感知异常潜在机制的理论。然而,非临床人群的研究结果存在矛盾。
本研究旨在检验非临床样本中白噪声言语错觉与精神症状亚临床表达之间的关联。将研究结果与先前结果进行比较,以调查潜在的方法学依赖性差异。
在一个普通人群青少年和年轻成人双胞胎样本(n = 704)中,使用修订版精神分裂症型结构化访谈(SIS-R)和精神体验社区评估(CAPE),通过多水平逻辑回归分析白噪声言语错觉与亚临床精神病体验之间的关联。
使用Galdos等人(2011年)的方法(阳性:调整后比值比:0.82,95%置信区间:0.6 - 1.12,p = 0.217;阴性:调整后比值比:0.75,95%置信区间:0.56 - 1.02,p = 0.065)以及Catalan等人(2014年)的方法(阳性:调整后比值比:1.11,95%置信区间:0.79 - 1.57,p = 0.557),在普通人群双胞胎样本中,对白噪声言语错觉的任何感知与阳性或阴性精神分裂症型均无关联。未发现CAPE评分与言语错觉之间存在关联(调整后比值比:1.25,95%置信区间:0.88 - 1.79,p = 0.220)。对于Catalan等人(2014年)而非Galdos等人(2011年)的方法,阳性精神分裂症型与具有阳性或阴性情感效价的言语错觉之间存在明显的负相关(调整后比值比:0.44,95%置信区间:0.24 - 0.81,p = 0.008)。
与临床人群的研究结果相反,白噪声言语错觉可能与非临床人群的精神病易感性无关。