Suppr超能文献

对于肺癌患者的淋巴结筛查,带芯的支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检是否必要?

Is endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with a stylet necessary for lymph node screening in lung cancer patients?

作者信息

Xu Y, Lin J, Jin Y, Wu X, Zheng H, Feng J

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tai Zhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, LinHai, Zhejiang Province, China.

Department of Medical Record Library, Tai Zhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, LinHai, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

Braz J Med Biol Res. 2017 Aug 17;50(10):e6372. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20176372.

Abstract

During endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), a needle is commonly used with a stylet, although recently the stylet has been omitted. This prospective study aimed to compare the quality of specimens obtained by EBUS-TBNA performed with and without a stylet. Between November 2013 and November 2014, 131 patients with lung cancer underwent EBUS-TBNA, with a total of 148 mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes sampled both with and without an inner-stylet, yielding 296 cytological specimens. Specimens were scored cytologically using five parameters: background blood or clot, amount of cellular material, degree of cellular degeneration, degree of cellular trauma, and retention of appropriate architecture. The procedure with a stylet required significantly longer operation time than without a stylet (14.5±0.8 vs 12.7±1.1 min, P<0.001). Excellent specimens were obtained in 261/296 and 260/296 samples in the procedures with and without a stylet, respectively (P=0.9), while the remaining 35 and 36 samples, respectively, were adequate. The diagnosing and staging of lung cancer using EBUS-TBNA did not differ significantly between the groups. In conclusion, specimen collection by EBUS-TBNA without a stylet is easier and faster than the procedure using a stylet and absence of a stylet did not alter specimen quality or diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

在支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)中,通常会使用带有针芯的穿刺针,不过最近针芯已被省去。这项前瞻性研究旨在比较使用和不使用针芯进行EBUS-TBNA所获取标本的质量。在2013年11月至2014年11月期间,131例肺癌患者接受了EBUS-TBNA,共对148个纵隔或肺门淋巴结进行了采样,既有使用内针芯的情况,也有不使用内针芯的情况,共获得296份细胞学标本。使用五个参数对标本进行细胞学评分:背景血液或凝块、细胞物质数量、细胞变性程度、细胞损伤程度以及适当结构的保留情况。使用针芯的操作所需的手术时间明显长于不使用针芯的情况(14.5±0.8 vs 12.7±1.1分钟,P<0.001)。在使用和不使用针芯的操作中,分别有261/296和260/296个样本获得了优质标本(P=0.9),而其余分别为35个和36个样本为合格标本。两组之间使用EBUS-TBNA对肺癌进行诊断和分期并无显著差异。总之,不使用针芯的EBUS-TBNA标本采集比使用针芯的操作更简便、快速,并且不使用针芯不会改变标本质量或诊断准确性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
PET/CT in the staging of the non-small-cell lung cancer.PET/CT在非小细胞肺癌分期中的应用
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:783739. doi: 10.1155/2012/783739. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验