Poh Eugene, Carroll Timothy J, de Rugy Aymar
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Centre for Sensorimotor Performance, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; and.
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov 1;118(5):2670-2686. doi: 10.1152/jn.00326.2016. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
Learned compensations for perturbed visual feedback of movement extent and direction generalize differently to unpracticed movement directions, which suggests different underlying neural mechanisms. Here we investigated whether gain and rotation adaptations are consistent with representation in different coordinate systems. Subjects performed a force-aiming task with the wrist and learned different gains or rotations for different force directions. Generalization was tested without visual feedback for the same extrinsic directions but with the forearm in a different pronation-supination orientation. When the change in forearm orientation caused the adapted visuomotor map to conflict in extrinsic and joint-based coordinates, rotation generalization occurred in extrinsic coordinates but with reduced magnitude. In contrast, gain generalization appeared reduced and phase shifted. When the forearm was rotated further, such that all imposed perturbations aligned in both joint-based and extrinsic coordinates in both postures, rotation generalization was further reduced, whereas there was neither reduction nor phase shift in the pattern of extent generalization. These results show that rotation generalization was expressed in extrinsic coordinates, and that generalization magnitude was modulated by posture. In contrast, gain generalization appeared to depend on target direction defined by an integrated combination of extrinsic and joint-based coordinates and was not reduced substantially by posture changes alone. Although the quality of the model fit underlying our interpretation prevents us from making strong conclusions, the data suggest that adaptations of movement direction and extent are represented according to distinct coordinate systems. Visuomotor gain and rotation adaptations generalize differently to novel movement directions, which suggests different neural mechanisms. When extrinsic and joint-based coordinates are effectively dissociated in an isometric aiming task, we find that they also generalize in different coordinate systems. Specifically, rotation generalized in extrinsic coordinates and decayed as posture departed from that adopted during adaptation. In contrast, gain generalization was expressed according to mixed extrinsic/joint-based coordinates and was not substantially reduced by postural changes.
对运动范围和方向的视觉反馈扰动的习得性补偿对未练习的运动方向的泛化方式不同,这表明存在不同的潜在神经机制。在这里,我们研究了增益和旋转适应是否与不同坐标系中的表征一致。受试者用手腕执行了一个力瞄准任务,并针对不同的力方向学习了不同的增益或旋转。在没有视觉反馈的情况下,针对相同的外在方向,但前臂处于不同的旋前-旋后方向,测试了泛化情况。当前臂方向的变化导致适应的视觉运动映射在外在坐标和基于关节的坐标中发生冲突时,旋转泛化在外在坐标中发生,但幅度减小。相比之下,增益泛化似乎减少且出现相位偏移。当前臂进一步旋转,使得两种姿势下施加的所有扰动在基于关节的坐标和外在坐标中都对齐时,旋转泛化进一步降低,而范围泛化模式既没有减少也没有相位偏移。这些结果表明,旋转泛化在外在坐标中表现出来,并且泛化幅度受到姿势的调节。相比之下,增益泛化似乎取决于由外在坐标和基于关节的坐标的综合组合定义的目标方向,并且不会仅因姿势变化而大幅降低。尽管我们解释背后的模型拟合质量使我们无法得出强有力的结论,但数据表明运动方向和范围的适应是根据不同的坐标系来表征的。视觉运动增益和旋转适应对新的运动方向的泛化方式不同,这表明存在不同的神经机制。当外在坐标和基于关节的坐标在等长瞄准任务中有效分离时,我们发现它们也在不同的坐标系中泛化。具体而言,旋转在外在坐标中泛化,并随着姿势偏离适应期间采用的姿势而衰减。相比之下,增益泛化是根据混合的外在/基于关节的坐标来表达的,并且不会因姿势变化而大幅降低。