Wehling Peter, Evans Christopher, Wehling Jana, Maixner William
Orthogen AG, Ernst-Schneider-Platz 1, 40212 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2017 Aug;9(8):183-196. doi: 10.1177/1759720X17712695. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Osteoarthritis is a painful, chronic disease with widespread burden on patients, communities, health and social care systems. Conservative therapies, such as nonpharmacological interventions, systemic drug treatment and intra-articular therapies are used before resorting to surgery; nonetheless, disease control often remains inadequate. Recent advances in osteoarthritis management have aimed to provide greater variety of treatment options. Here, we summarize a targeted literature review evaluating efficacy and safety of intra-articular therapies for osteoarthritis. Injections of intra-articular therapies directly into the joint avoid conventional barriers to joint entry, increase bioavailability and lower systemic toxicity. Intra-articular corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid are established United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)/European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved treatments; however, concerns exist regarding effect duration, safety, effectiveness across populations and heterogeneity. Newer therapies, such as autologous blood products and mesenchymal stem cells, are in development. Benefits of autologous blood products (e.g. platelet-rich plasma, autologous conditioned serum) include an expected improved safety profile and direct targeting of osteoarthritis-related pathophysiology. Autologous conditioned serum is cell-free and manufactured by a standardized process, whereas platelet-rich plasma composition and characteristics can vary. Currently, only limited efficacy comparisons between these biological treatments can be drawn; long-term clinical and safety studies are needed to increase the efficacy evidence base and earn consideration in treatment frameworks.
骨关节炎是一种疼痛的慢性疾病,给患者、社区、卫生和社会护理系统带来广泛负担。在采取手术治疗之前,会采用保守疗法,如非药物干预、全身药物治疗和关节内治疗;尽管如此,疾病控制往往仍不充分。骨关节炎管理的最新进展旨在提供更多样化的治疗选择。在此,我们总结了一项针对性文献综述,评估关节内治疗骨关节炎的疗效和安全性。将关节内治疗药物直接注射到关节内可避免传统的关节进入障碍,提高生物利用度并降低全身毒性。关节内注射皮质类固醇和透明质酸是美国食品药品监督管理局(US FDA)/欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的既定治疗方法;然而,在作用持续时间、安全性、不同人群的有效性以及异质性方面仍存在担忧。自体血液制品和间充质干细胞等较新的疗法正在研发中。自体血液制品(如富血小板血浆、自体条件血清)的益处包括预期的安全性改善以及对骨关节炎相关病理生理学的直接靶向作用。自体条件血清不含细胞且通过标准化流程制备,而富血小板血浆的成分和特性可能有所不同。目前,这些生物治疗之间仅能进行有限的疗效比较;需要长期的临床和安全性研究来增加疗效证据基础,并使其在治疗框架中得到考虑。