Ash Tayla, Agaronov Alen, Young Ta'Loria, Aftosmes-Tobio Alyssa, Davison Kirsten K
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, SPH-2 655 Huntington Avenue, Boston, 02115, USA.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Nutrition, Kresge Building 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, 02115, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 24;14(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0571-2.
A wide range of interventions has been implemented and tested to prevent obesity in children. Given parents' influence and control over children's energy-balance behaviors, including diet, physical activity, media use, and sleep, family interventions are a key strategy in this effort. The objective of this study was to profile the field of recent family-based childhood obesity prevention interventions by employing systematic review and quantitative content analysis methods to identify gaps in the knowledge base.
Using a comprehensive search strategy, we searched the PubMed, PsycIFO, and CINAHL databases to identify eligible interventions aimed at preventing childhood obesity with an active family component published between 2008 and 2015. Characteristics of study design, behavioral domains targeted, and sample demographics were extracted from eligible articles using a comprehensive codebook.
More than 90% of the 119 eligible interventions were based in the United States, Europe, or Australia. Most interventions targeted children 2-5 years of age (43%) or 6-10 years of age (35%), with few studies targeting the prenatal period (8%) or children 14-17 years of age (7%). The home (28%), primary health care (27%), and community (33%) were the most common intervention settings. Diet (90%) and physical activity (82%) were more frequently targeted in interventions than media use (55%) and sleep (20%). Only 16% of interventions targeted all four behavioral domains. In addition to studies in developing countries, racial minorities and non-traditional families were also underrepresented. Hispanic/Latino and families of low socioeconomic status were highly represented.
The limited number of interventions targeting diverse populations and obesity risk behaviors beyond diet and physical activity inhibit the development of comprehensive, tailored interventions. To ensure a broad evidence base, more interventions implemented in developing countries and targeting racial minorities, children at both ends of the age spectrum, and media and sleep behaviors would be beneficial. This study can help inform future decision-making around the design and funding of family-based interventions to prevent childhood obesity.
为预防儿童肥胖,人们实施并测试了多种干预措施。鉴于父母对孩子能量平衡行为(包括饮食、体育活动、媒体使用和睡眠)的影响和控制,家庭干预是这项工作的关键策略。本研究的目的是通过系统评价和定量内容分析方法,剖析近期基于家庭的儿童肥胖预防干预领域,以找出知识库中的差距。
我们采用全面的检索策略,在PubMed、PsycINFO和CINAHL数据库中进行检索,以识别2008年至2015年间发表的、旨在预防儿童肥胖且有积极家庭参与成分的合格干预措施。使用综合编码手册从合格文章中提取研究设计特征、目标行为领域和样本人口统计学信息。
119项合格干预措施中,超过90%来自美国、欧洲或澳大利亚。大多数干预措施针对2至5岁(43%)或6至10岁(35%)的儿童,针对孕期(8%)或14至17岁儿童(7%)的研究较少。家庭(28%)、初级卫生保健机构(27%)和社区(33%)是最常见的干预场所。干预措施中,饮食(90%)和体育活动(82%)比媒体使用(55%)和睡眠(20%)更常被作为目标。只有16%的干预措施针对所有四个行为领域。除了发展中国家的研究外,少数族裔和非传统家庭的研究也较少。西班牙裔/拉丁裔和社会经济地位较低的家庭占比很高。
针对不同人群以及饮食和体育活动之外的肥胖风险行为的干预措施数量有限,这阻碍了全面、量身定制的干预措施的发展。为确保有广泛的证据基础,在发展中国家实施更多针对少数族裔、各年龄段儿童以及媒体和睡眠行为的干预措施将是有益的。本研究有助于为未来围绕基于家庭的干预措施的设计和资金投入的决策提供参考,以预防儿童肥胖。