Jubelt Lindsay E, Goldfeld Keith S, Blecker Saul B, Chung Wei-Yi, Bendo John A, Bosco Joseph A, Errico Thomas J, Frempong-Boadu Anthony K, Iorio Richard, Slover James D, Horwitz Leora I
From the Department of Population Health (Dr. Jubelt, Dr. Goldfeld, Dr. Blecker, Ms. Chung, and Dr. Horwitz), the Department of Medicine (Dr. Jubelt, Dr. Goldfeld, Dr. Blecker, and Dr. Horwitz), the Department of Neurosurgery (Dr. Frempong-Boadu), New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery (Dr. Bendo, Dr. Bosco, Dr. Errico, Dr. Iorio, and Dr. Slover), New York University Langone Medical Center and NYU School of Medicine, New York.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Sep;25(9):654-663. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00626.
Orthopaedic care is shifting to alternative payment models. We examined whether New York University Langone Medical Center achieved savings under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative.
This study was a difference-in-differences study of Medicare fee-for-service patients hospitalized from April 2011 to June 2012 and October 2013 to December 2014 for lower extremity joint arthroplasty, cardiac valve procedures, or spine surgery (intervention groups), or for congestive heart failure, major bowel procedures, medical peripheral vascular disorders, medical noninfectious orthopaedic care, or stroke (control group). We examined total episode costs and costs by service category.
We included 2,940 intervention episodes and 1,474 control episodes. Relative to the trend in the control group, lower extremity joint arthroplasty episodes achieved the greatest savings: adjusted average episode cost during the intervention period decreased by $3,017 (95% confidence interval [CI], -$6,066 to $31). For cardiac procedures, the adjusted average episode cost decreased by $2,999 (95% CI, -$8,103 to $2,105), and for spinal fusion, it increased by $8,291 (95% CI, $2,879 to $13,703). Savings were driven predominantly by shifting postdischarge care from inpatient rehabilitation facilities to home. Spinal fusion index admission costs increased because of changes in surgical technique.
Under bundled payment, New York University Langone Medical Center decreased total episode costs in patients undergoing lower extremity joint arthroplasty. For patients undergoing cardiac valve procedures, evidence of savings was not as strong, and for patients undergoing spinal fusion, total episode costs increased. For all three conditions, the proportion of patients referred to inpatient rehabilitation facilities upon discharge decreased. These changes were not associated with an increase in index hospital length of stay or readmission rate.
Opportunities for savings under bundled payment may be greater for lower extremity joint arthroplasty than for other conditions.
骨科护理正转向替代支付模式。我们研究了纽约大学朗格尼医学中心在医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的改善护理捆绑支付计划下是否实现了成本节约。
本研究是一项双重差分研究,研究对象为2011年4月至2012年6月以及2013年10月至2014年12月因下肢关节置换术、心脏瓣膜手术或脊柱手术住院的医疗保险按服务项目付费患者(干预组),以及因充血性心力衰竭、大肠手术、医疗性外周血管疾病、医疗性非感染性骨科护理或中风住院的患者(对照组)。我们研究了总疗程成本和按服务类别划分的成本。
我们纳入了2940个干预疗程和1474个对照疗程。相对于对照组的趋势,下肢关节置换术疗程实现了最大幅度的成本节约:干预期间调整后的平均疗程成本下降了3017美元(95%置信区间[CI],-6066美元至31美元)。对于心脏手术,调整后的平均疗程成本下降了2999美元(95%CI,-8103美元至2105美元),而对于脊柱融合手术,成本增加了8291美元(95%CI,2879美元至13703美元)。成本节约主要是由于将出院后护理从住院康复机构转移到了家中。由于手术技术的改变,脊柱融合手术首次入院成本增加。
在捆绑支付模式下,纽约大学朗格尼医学中心降低了接受下肢关节置换术患者的总疗程成本。对于接受心脏瓣膜手术的患者,成本节约的证据不那么明显,而对于接受脊柱融合手术的患者,总疗程成本增加。对于所有这三种情况,出院时转诊至住院康复机构的患者比例均下降。这些变化与首次住院时长或再入院率的增加无关。
捆绑支付模式下,下肢关节置换术的成本节约机会可能比其他情况更大。