• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

到2050年医疗保险患者单节段间接腰椎椎间融合术的手术量及相关费用预测。

Projections of single-level indirect lumbar interbody fusion volume and associated costs for Medicare patients to 2050.

作者信息

Mani Kyle A, Goldman Samuel N, Akioyamen Noel, Kleinbart Emily, Gelfand Yaroslav, Murthy Saikiran, Krystal Jonathan, Eleswarapu Ananth, Yassari Reza, Fourman Mitchell S

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.

出版信息

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Feb 13;22:100597. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100597. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100597
PMID:40236876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11999186/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anterior, Oblique, and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions (ALIF/OLIF/LLIF) are powerful modalities for achieving indirect decompression of lumbar foraminal stenosis while providing a large fusion surface and preserving the posterior vertebral structures. This study aimed to project future trends in the implementation rates and associated costs of ALIF/OLIF/LLIF in Medicare patients aged >65 in the US.

METHODS

Data was acquired from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2022, using CPT codes to identify ALIF/OLIF/LLIF procedures. The Prophet machine learning algorithm, using Bayesian Inference, was applied to data from 2000 to 2019 to generate point forecasts for 2020 to 2050 with 95% forecast intervals (FIs). Predictive performance was evaluated by splitting the data into training (75%) and validation (25%) sets, and calculating normalized root mean square error (NRMSE). Sensitivity analyses were conducted by comparing Prophet's projections with those from Linear and Log-linear Ordinary Linear Squares, Poisson, Negative-Binomial, and ARIMA models. Compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) were calculated to assess prior and future trends in procedural volume and costs from 2000 to 2050. CMS procedure counts were adjusted for Medicare Advantage patients using Kaiser Family Foundation data and costs were adjusted for inflation using the U.S. Consumer Price Index. Alternative volume projections were provided to account for the (I) impact of COVID-19 and (II) future expenditure limits using the 2022 to 2031 CMS National Health Expenditure report.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2019, the adjusted annual ALIF/OLIF/LLIF volume increased from 5,093 to 45,758 cases, with a CAGR of 12.32%. The total adjusted cost for these procedures increased from $7,750,692 to $43,531,555, with a CAGR of 9.62%. During the same period, the mean inflation-adjusted reimbursement for ALIF/OLIF/LLIFs 37.8% from $1,194.86 to $743.21 per procedure. Based on Prophet model analysis, projections estimate that procedural volume and total cost will increase by 17.8% and 14.8%, respectively, for each 5-year period from 2020 to 2050. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a 2.9% decrease in ALIF/OLIF/LLIF procedural volume in 2020 compared to 2019, but volume recovered by 2022, increasing by 1.4% from prepandemic levels. By 2050, procedural volume accounting for COVID-19 reflects a 23.5% reduction compared to estimates that did not factor in COVID-19. The Prophet model demonstrated the best predictive performance, with NRMSE values of 0.0619 for volume and 0.0507 for costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Large increases in the utilization and costs of ALIF/OLIF/LLIF are anticipated through 2050. By 2030, the estimated carrying capacity for ALIF/OLIF/LLIF expenditures is projected to reach approximately $75.6 million, constrained by CMS expenditure limits and market size. Prophet model projections indicate that expenditures for ALIF/OLIF/LLIF are expected to exceed this cap by the end of the decade.

摘要

背景

前路、斜路和侧路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF/OLIF/LLIF)是实现腰椎椎间孔狭窄间接减压的有效方式,同时可提供较大的融合面积并保留椎体后部结构。本研究旨在预测美国65岁以上医疗保险患者中ALIF/OLIF/LLIF的实施率及相关成本的未来趋势。

方法

数据来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS),时间跨度为2000年1月1日至2022年12月31日,使用现行程序编码(CPT)识别ALIF/OLIF/LLIF手术。运用Prophet机器学习算法,通过贝叶斯推理,对2000年至2019年的数据进行分析,以生成2020年至2050年的点预测及95%的预测区间(FI)。通过将数据分为训练集(75%)和验证集(25%),并计算归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)来评估预测性能。通过将Prophet的预测结果与线性和对数线性普通最小二乘法、泊松、负二项式和自回归积分滑动平均(ARIMA)模型的预测结果进行比较,进行敏感性分析。计算复合年增长率(CAGR)以评估2000年至2050年手术量和成本的既往及未来趋势。使用凯撒家庭基金会的数据对医疗保险优势患者的CMS手术计数进行调整,并使用美国消费者价格指数对成本进行通胀调整。提供了替代手术量预测,以考虑(I)COVID-19的影响和(II)使用2022年至2031年CMS国家卫生支出报告中的未来支出限制。

结果

2000年至2019年期间,调整后的年度ALIF/OLIF/LLIF手术量从5093例增加到45758例,复合年增长率为12.32%。这些手术的总调整成本从7750692美元增加到43531555美元,复合年增长率为9.62%。在此期间,ALIF/OLIF/LLIF的平均通胀调整后报销费用从每例1194.86美元降至743.21美元,降幅为37.8%。基于Prophet模型分析,预测估计从2020年到2050年,每5年期间手术量和总成本将分别增加17.8%和14.8%。与2019年相比,COVID-19大流行导致2020年ALIF/OLIF/LLIF手术量下降了2.9%,但到2022年手术量恢复,较疫情前水平增加了1.4%。到2050年,考虑COVID-19因素后的手术量与未考虑COVID-19因素的估计相比下降了23.5%。Prophet模型表现出最佳的预测性能,手术量的NRMSE值为0.0619,成本的NRMSE值为0.0507。

结论

预计到2050年,ALIF/OLIF/LLIF的使用和成本将大幅增加。到2030年,受CMS支出限制和市场规模的约束,ALIF/OLIF/LLIF支出的估计承载能力预计将达到约7560万美元。Prophet模型预测表明,到本十年末,ALIF/OLIF/LLIF的支出预计将超过这一上限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/583a/11999186/e0833661907e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/583a/11999186/b1f1d262c0d2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/583a/11999186/be79d30c9480/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/583a/11999186/e8b09b5f253e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/583a/11999186/e0833661907e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/583a/11999186/b1f1d262c0d2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/583a/11999186/be79d30c9480/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/583a/11999186/e8b09b5f253e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/583a/11999186/e0833661907e/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Projections of single-level indirect lumbar interbody fusion volume and associated costs for Medicare patients to 2050.到2050年医疗保险患者单节段间接腰椎椎间融合术的手术量及相关费用预测。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Feb 13;22:100597. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100597. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Changes in Segmental and Lumbar Lordosis Following Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腰椎椎间融合术后节段性及腰椎前凸的变化:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Jul 1;38(6):294-303. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001728. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
3
Projections of Single-level and Multilevel Spinal Instrumentation Procedure Volume and Associated Costs for Medicare Patients to 2050.到 2050 年,医疗保险患者单节段和多节段脊柱器械手术量和相关费用的预测。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 May 15;8(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00053. eCollection 2024 May 1.
4
Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.腰椎椎间融合术:技术、适应证以及椎间融合选择的比较,包括后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)、改良经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)、斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术/前斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF/ATP)、侧方腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)和前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.
5
Comparison of surgical outcomes between oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).斜外侧椎间融合术(OLIF)与前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)的手术效果比较。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;209:106901. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106901. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
6
Comparative Analysis of Inpatient Opioid Consumption Between Different Surgical Approaches Following Single Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery.单节段腰椎融合手术后不同手术方式住院期间阿片类药物消耗量的比较分析
Global Spine J. 2023 Oct;13(8):2508-2515. doi: 10.1177/21925682221089244. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.微创前路和外侧经椎间孔入路闭合复位治疗 II 度脊椎滑脱:初步临床和放射学经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17574.
8
Cost-utility of lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a systematic review.腰椎椎间融合手术的成本效益:一项系统评价。
Spine J. 2025 Jun;25(6):1117-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.027. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
9
Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.术式是否有影响?单节段腰椎融合术中脊柱骨盆参数的比较影像学分析。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):1999-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates.L1-L5节段(OLIF25)和L5-S1节段(OLIF51)斜外侧椎间融合术的技术描述及并发症与融合率评估
Spine J. 2017 Apr;17(4):545-553. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use prior to spinal surgery results in reduced postoperative length of stay: A propensity-score matched analysis.脊柱手术前使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂可缩短术后住院时间:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Apr 18;22:100612. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100612. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
National-level and state-level prevalence of overweight and obesity among children, adolescents, and adults in the USA, 1990-2021, and forecasts up to 2050.1990年至2021年美国儿童、青少年和成年人中超重和肥胖的国家级和州级患病率,以及到2050年的预测。
Lancet. 2024 Dec 7;404(10469):2278-2298. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01548-4. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
2
Growing utilization of ambulatory spine surgery in Medicare patients from 2010-2021.2010年至2021年医疗保险患者门诊脊柱手术的使用情况不断增加。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Jan 26;17:100314. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100314. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Medicare procedural costs in ambulatory surgery centers versus hospital outpatient departments for spine surgeries.
脊柱手术在门诊手术中心和医院门诊部门的医保程序成本比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Sep 29;40(1):115-120. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.SPINE23424. Print 2024 Jan 1.
4
Procedures employing interbody devices and multi-level fusion require target price adjustment to build a sustainable lumbar fusion bundled payment model.采用椎间植入物和多节段融合的手术需要调整目标价格,以建立可持续的腰椎融合捆绑支付模式。
Spine J. 2023 Oct;23(10):1485-1493. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
5
Projections and Epidemiology of Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients to 2040-2060.医疗保险患者原发性髋关节和膝关节置换术至2040 - 2060年的预测与流行病学
JB JS Open Access. 2023 Feb 28;8(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00112. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
6
Is Indirect Decompression and Fusion More Effective than Direct Decompression and Fusion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Instability? A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis.对于治疗伴有不稳的退变性腰椎管狭窄症,间接减压融合术是否比直接减压融合术更有效?一项系统评价和Meta分析。
Global Spine J. 2023 Mar;13(2):499-511. doi: 10.1177/21925682221098362. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
Bundled Payment Models in Spine Surgery.脊柱外科的捆绑支付模式
Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(1_suppl):7S-13S. doi: 10.1177/2192568220974977.
8
Indirect decompression via oblique lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with direct decompression transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion.斜外侧椎间融合术间接减压治疗重度退行性腰椎管狭窄症:与直接减压经椎间孔/后路腰椎间融合术的对比研究。
Spine J. 2021 Jun;21(6):963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.025. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
Beyond 2020: Modelling obesity and diabetes prevalence.超越 2020 年:肥胖和糖尿病患病率建模。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Sep;167:108362. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108362. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
10
Recent trends in medicare utilization and reimbursement for lumbar spine fusion and discectomy procedures.近年来,腰椎融合术和椎间盘切除术的医疗保险利用和报销情况的变化趋势。
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1586-1594. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.558. Epub 2020 Jun 10.