Prior Matthew, Bagness Carmel, Brewin Jane, Coomarasamy Arri, Easthope Lucy, Hepworth-Jones Barbara, Hinshaw Kim, O'Toole Emily, Orford Julie, Regan Lesley, Raine-Fenning Nick, Shakespeare Judy, Small Rachel, Thornton Jim, Metcalf Leanne
Department of Child Health Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Royal College of Nursing, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 23;7(8):e016571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016571.
To identify and prioritise important research questions for miscarriage.
A priority setting partnership using prospective surveys and consensus meetings following methods advocated by the James Lind Alliance.
UK.
Women and those affected by miscarriage working alongside healthcare professionals.
In the initial survey, 1093 participants (932 women who have experienced miscarriage, 8 partners, 17 family members, friends or colleagues, 104 healthcare professionals and eight charitable organisations) submitted 3279 questions. A review of existing literature identified a further 64. Non-questions were removed, and the remaining questions were categorised and summarised into 58 questions. In an interim electronic survey, 2122 respondents chose their top 10 priorities from the 58 summary questions. The 25 highest ranked in the survey were prioritised at a final face-to-face workshop. In summary, the top 10 priorities were ranked as follows: research into preventative treatment, emotional aspects in general, investigation, relevance of pre-existing medical conditions, emotional support as a treatment, importance of lifestyle factors, importance of genetic and chromosomal causes, preconception tests, investigation after different numbers of miscarriage and male causal factors.
These results should be the focus of future miscarriage research. Presently, studies are being conducted to address the top priority; however, many other priorities, especially psychological and emotional support, are less well researched areas. We hope our results will encourage both researchers and funders to focus on these priorities.
确定流产重要的研究问题并排出优先顺序。
采用前瞻性调查和共识会议的优先事项确定合作项目,遵循詹姆斯·林德联盟倡导的方法。
英国。
女性以及受流产影响的人与医疗保健专业人员共同参与。
在初始调查中,1093名参与者(932名有流产经历的女性、8名伴侣、17名家庭成员、朋友或同事、104名医疗保健专业人员和8个慈善组织)提交了3279个问题。对现有文献的回顾又发现了64个问题。去除非问题内容后,其余问题被分类并总结为58个问题。在一项中期电子调查中,2122名受访者从这58个总结问题中选出了他们的前10个优先事项。在最后的面对面研讨会上,对调查中排名前25位的事项进行了优先排序。总之,前10个优先事项的排名如下:预防性治疗研究、一般情绪方面、调查、既往病史的相关性、作为治疗手段的情感支持、生活方式因素的重要性、遗传和染色体原因的重要性、孕前检查、不同流产次数后的调查以及男性因果因素。
这些结果应成为未来流产研究的重点。目前,正在开展研究以解决首要优先事项;然而,许多其他优先事项,尤其是心理和情感支持方面,是研究较少的领域。我们希望我们的结果将鼓励研究人员和资助者关注这些优先事项。