Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 14;10(7):e036347. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036347.
To identify research priorities for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy from individuals with lived experience and healthcare professionals.
Prospective surveys and consensus meetings using principles outlined by the James Lind Alliance.
UK.
A steering group was established and 'uncertainties' were gathered using an online survey and literature search. An interim online survey ranked long-listed questions and the top 10 research questions were reached by consensus at a final prioritisation workshop.
Women, partners, relatives and friends of those with lived experience of pregnancy hypertension, researchers and healthcare professionals.
The initial online survey was answered by 278 participants (180 women with lived experience, 9 partners/relatives/friends, 71 healthcare professionals and 18 researchers). Together with a literature search, this identified 764 questions which were refined into 50 summary questions. All summary questions were presented in an interim prioritisation survey that was answered by 155 participants (87 women with lived experience, 4 partners/relatives/friends, 49 healthcare professionals and 15 researchers). The top 25 highest ranked questions were considered by the final prioritisation workshop. The top 10 uncertainties were identified by consensus and ranked as follows in order of priority: long-term consequences of pregnancy hypertension (for the woman and baby), short-term complications of pregnancy hypertension (for the woman and baby), screening tests for pre-eclampsia, prevention of long-term problems (for the woman and baby), causes of pregnancy hypertension, prevention of recurrent pregnancy hypertension, educational needs of healthcare professionals, diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, management of pregnancy hypertension, provision of support for women and families.
Research priorities shared by those with lived experience of pregnancy hypertension and healthcare professionals have been identified. Researchers should use these to inform the choice of future studies in this area.
从有过妊娠高血压病史的个人和医疗保健专业人员中确定妊娠高血压疾病的研究重点。
使用詹姆斯·林德联盟(James Lind Alliance)概述的原则进行前瞻性调查和共识会议。
英国。
成立一个指导小组,并通过在线调查和文献搜索收集“不确定性”。一项中期在线调查对长名单上的问题进行了排名,前 10 名研究问题在最终的重点排序研讨会上通过共识确定。
有妊娠高血压病史的妇女、伴侣、亲属和朋友、研究人员和医疗保健专业人员。
最初的在线调查由 278 名参与者(180 名有过妊娠高血压病史的妇女、9 名伴侣/亲属/朋友、71 名医疗保健专业人员和 18 名研究人员)回答。加上文献搜索,共确定了 764 个问题,这些问题被提炼成 50 个总结问题。所有总结问题都在中期优先排序调查中呈现,该调查由 155 名参与者(87 名有过妊娠高血压病史的妇女、4 名伴侣/亲属/朋友、49 名医疗保健专业人员和 15 名研究人员)回答。前 25 个排名最高的问题由最终的重点排序研讨会考虑。通过共识确定了前 10 个不确定性,并按优先顺序排名如下:妊娠高血压的长期后果(对妇女和婴儿)、妊娠高血压的短期并发症(对妇女和婴儿)、子痫前期的筛查试验、预防长期问题(对妇女和婴儿)、妊娠高血压的病因、预防复发性妊娠高血压、医疗保健专业人员的教育需求、子痫前期的诊断、妊娠高血压的管理、为妇女和家庭提供支持。
确定了有过妊娠高血压病史的个人和医疗保健专业人员共同关注的研究重点。研究人员应将这些重点用于为该领域未来的研究提供信息。