Oxford Trauma, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Sport, Health Sciences and Social Work, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e030028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030028.
To determine research priorities for the management of broken bones of the upper limb in people over 50, which represent the shared priorities of patients, their families, carers and healthcare professionals.
DESIGN/SETTING: A national (UK) research priority setting partnership.
People aged 50 and over who have experienced a fracture of the upper limb, carers involved in their care, family and friends of patients, healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of these patients.
Using a multiphase methodology in partnership with the James Lind Alliance over 15 months (September 2017 to December 2018), a national scoping survey asked respondents to submit their research uncertainties. These were amalgamated into a smaller number of research questions. The existing evidence was searched to ensure that the questions had not already been answered. A second national survey asked respondents to prioritise the research questions. A final shortlist of 25 questions was taken to a multi-stakeholder workshop where a consensus was reached on the top 10 priorities.
There were 1898 original uncertainties submitted by 328 respondents to the first survey. These original uncertainties were refined into 51 research questions of which 50 were judged to be true uncertainties following a review of the research evidence. There were 209 respondents to the second (interim prioritisation) survey. The top 10 priorities encompass a broad range of uncertainties in management and rehabilitation of upper limb fractures.
The top 10 UK research priorities highlight uncertainties in how we assess outcomes, provide information, achieve pain control, rationalise surgical intervention, optimise rehabilitation and provide psychological support. The breadth of these research areas highlights the value of this methodology. This work should help to steer research in this area for the next 5-10 years and the challenge for researchers now is to refine and deliver answers to these research priorities.
确定 50 岁以上上肢骨折患者管理的研究重点,这些重点反映了患者、他们的家属、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员的共同关注点。
设计/背景:一项全国性(英国)研究重点设定伙伴关系。
年龄在 50 岁及以上,经历过上肢骨折的人、参与他们护理的照顾者、患者的家人和朋友、参与这些患者治疗的医疗保健专业人员。
使用与詹姆斯林德联盟合作的多阶段方法,历时 15 个月(2017 年 9 月至 2018 年 12 月),一项全国范围的调查要求受访者提交他们的研究不确定性。这些不确定性被合并成少数几个研究问题。搜索现有证据以确保这些问题尚未得到回答。第二项全国性调查要求受访者对研究问题进行优先排序。最后从 25 个问题中选出一个短名单,在一个多利益相关者研讨会上达成共识,确定前 10 个优先事项。
第一次调查有 328 名受访者提交了 1898 个原始不确定性。这些原始不确定性被细化为 51 个研究问题,其中 50 个在审查研究证据后被认为是真正的不确定性。第二次(中期优先排序)调查有 209 名受访者。前 10 个优先事项涵盖了上肢骨折管理和康复方面的广泛不确定性。
英国前 10 项研究重点突出了我们在评估结果、提供信息、控制疼痛、合理化手术干预、优化康复和提供心理支持方面的不确定性。这些研究领域的广泛范围突出了这种方法的价值。这项工作应该有助于指导未来 5-10 年的该领域研究,现在研究人员面临的挑战是细化并回答这些研究重点。