Gupta S, Miskovic D, Bhandari P, Dolwani S, McKaig B, Pullan R, Rembacken B, Riley S, Rutter M D, Suzuki N, Tsiamoulos Z, Valori R, Vance M E, Faiz O D, Saunders B P, Thomas-Gibson S
Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, Harrow, UK.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;4(4):244-248. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100331. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
Endoscopists are now expected to perform polypectomy routinely. Colonic polypectomy varies in difficulty, depending on polyp morphology, size, location and access. The measurement of the degree of difficulty of polypectomy, based on polyp characteristics, has not previously been described.
To define the level of difficulty of polypectomy.
Consensus by nine endoscopists regarding parameters that determine the complexity of a polyp was achieved through the Delphi method. The endoscopists then assigned a polyp complexity level to each possible combination of parameters. A scoring system to measure the difficulty level of a polyp was developed and validated by two different expert endoscopists.
Through two Delphi rounds, four factors for determining the complexity of a polypectomy were identified: size (S), morphology (M), site (S) and access (A). A scoring system was established, based on size (1-9 points), morphology (1-3 points), site (1-2 points) and access (1-3 points). Four polyp levels (with increasing level of complexity) were identified based on the range of scores obtained: level I (4-5), level II (6-9), level III (10-12) and level IV (>12). There was a high degree of interrater reliability for the polyp scores (interclass correlation coefficient of 0.93) and levels (κ=0.888).
The scoring system is feasible and reliable. Defining polyp complexity levels may be useful for planning training, competency assessment and certification in colonoscopic polypectomy. This may allow for more efficient service delivery and referral pathways.
如今,内镜医师需要常规进行息肉切除术。结肠息肉切除术的难度因息肉的形态、大小、位置和可达性而异。此前尚未描述过基于息肉特征来衡量息肉切除术难度程度的方法。
确定息肉切除术的难度水平。
通过德尔菲法达成了9位内镜医师关于决定息肉复杂性参数的共识。然后,内镜医师为每个可能的参数组合分配一个息肉复杂程度等级。由两位不同的内镜专家开发并验证了一种用于衡量息肉难度水平的评分系统。
经过两轮德尔菲法,确定了决定息肉切除术复杂性的四个因素:大小(S)、形态(M)、部位(S)和可达性(A)。基于大小(1 - 9分)、形态(1 - 3分)、部位(1 - 2分)和可达性(1 - 3分)建立了一个评分系统。根据获得的分数范围确定了四个息肉等级(复杂性逐渐增加):I级(4 - 5分)、II级(6 - 9分)、III级(10 - 12分)和IV级(>12分)。息肉评分(组内相关系数为0.93)和等级(κ = 0.888)具有高度的评分者间信度。
该评分系统可行且可靠。定义息肉复杂程度等级可能有助于规划结肠镜息肉切除术的培训、能力评估和认证。这可能会实现更高效的服务提供和转诊途径。