Suppr超能文献

一种确定结肠镜息肉切除术难度的新方法。

A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy.

作者信息

Gupta S, Miskovic D, Bhandari P, Dolwani S, McKaig B, Pullan R, Rembacken B, Riley S, Rutter M D, Suzuki N, Tsiamoulos Z, Valori R, Vance M E, Faiz O D, Saunders B P, Thomas-Gibson S

机构信息

Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, Harrow, UK.

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;4(4):244-248. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100331. Epub 2013 Jun 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopists are now expected to perform polypectomy routinely. Colonic polypectomy varies in difficulty, depending on polyp morphology, size, location and access. The measurement of the degree of difficulty of polypectomy, based on polyp characteristics, has not previously been described.

OBJECTIVE

To define the level of difficulty of polypectomy.

METHODS

Consensus by nine endoscopists regarding parameters that determine the complexity of a polyp was achieved through the Delphi method. The endoscopists then assigned a polyp complexity level to each possible combination of parameters. A scoring system to measure the difficulty level of a polyp was developed and validated by two different expert endoscopists.

RESULTS

Through two Delphi rounds, four factors for determining the complexity of a polypectomy were identified: size (S), morphology (M), site (S) and access (A). A scoring system was established, based on size (1-9 points), morphology (1-3 points), site (1-2 points) and access (1-3 points). Four polyp levels (with increasing level of complexity) were identified based on the range of scores obtained: level I (4-5), level II (6-9), level III (10-12) and level IV (>12). There was a high degree of interrater reliability for the polyp scores (interclass correlation coefficient of 0.93) and levels (κ=0.888).

CONCLUSIONS

The scoring system is feasible and reliable. Defining polyp complexity levels may be useful for planning training, competency assessment and certification in colonoscopic polypectomy. This may allow for more efficient service delivery and referral pathways.

摘要

引言

如今,内镜医师需要常规进行息肉切除术。结肠息肉切除术的难度因息肉的形态、大小、位置和可达性而异。此前尚未描述过基于息肉特征来衡量息肉切除术难度程度的方法。

目的

确定息肉切除术的难度水平。

方法

通过德尔菲法达成了9位内镜医师关于决定息肉复杂性参数的共识。然后,内镜医师为每个可能的参数组合分配一个息肉复杂程度等级。由两位不同的内镜专家开发并验证了一种用于衡量息肉难度水平的评分系统。

结果

经过两轮德尔菲法,确定了决定息肉切除术复杂性的四个因素:大小(S)、形态(M)、部位(S)和可达性(A)。基于大小(1 - 9分)、形态(1 - 3分)、部位(1 - 2分)和可达性(1 - 3分)建立了一个评分系统。根据获得的分数范围确定了四个息肉等级(复杂性逐渐增加):I级(4 - 5分)、II级(6 - 9分)、III级(10 - 12分)和IV级(>12分)。息肉评分(组内相关系数为0.93)和等级(κ = 0.888)具有高度的评分者间信度。

结论

该评分系统可行且可靠。定义息肉复杂程度等级可能有助于规划结肠镜息肉切除术的培训、能力评估和认证。这可能会实现更高效的服务提供和转诊途径。

相似文献

1
A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy.一种确定结肠镜息肉切除术难度的新方法。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;4(4):244-248. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100331. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
2
Validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy.验证一种评估息肉切除术能力的新方法。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.028. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
5
Endoscopic measurement of polyp size using a novel calibrated hood.使用新型校准罩进行息肉大小的内镜测量。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:714294. doi: 10.1155/2014/714294. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

4
Unlocking quality in endoscopic mucosal resection.在内镜黏膜切除术中实现高质量切除。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May 16;15(5):338-353. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.338.
6
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in flexible sigmoidoscopy.乙状结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):181-200. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102259. eCollection 2023.
7
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):201-221. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102260. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

6
New methods of polypectomy.息肉切除术的新方法。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997 Jul;7(3):413-22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验