• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种确定结肠镜息肉切除术难度的新方法。

A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy.

作者信息

Gupta S, Miskovic D, Bhandari P, Dolwani S, McKaig B, Pullan R, Rembacken B, Riley S, Rutter M D, Suzuki N, Tsiamoulos Z, Valori R, Vance M E, Faiz O D, Saunders B P, Thomas-Gibson S

机构信息

Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, Harrow, UK.

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;4(4):244-248. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100331. Epub 2013 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1136/flgastro-2013-100331
PMID:28839733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5369843/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopists are now expected to perform polypectomy routinely. Colonic polypectomy varies in difficulty, depending on polyp morphology, size, location and access. The measurement of the degree of difficulty of polypectomy, based on polyp characteristics, has not previously been described.

OBJECTIVE

To define the level of difficulty of polypectomy.

METHODS

Consensus by nine endoscopists regarding parameters that determine the complexity of a polyp was achieved through the Delphi method. The endoscopists then assigned a polyp complexity level to each possible combination of parameters. A scoring system to measure the difficulty level of a polyp was developed and validated by two different expert endoscopists.

RESULTS

Through two Delphi rounds, four factors for determining the complexity of a polypectomy were identified: size (S), morphology (M), site (S) and access (A). A scoring system was established, based on size (1-9 points), morphology (1-3 points), site (1-2 points) and access (1-3 points). Four polyp levels (with increasing level of complexity) were identified based on the range of scores obtained: level I (4-5), level II (6-9), level III (10-12) and level IV (>12). There was a high degree of interrater reliability for the polyp scores (interclass correlation coefficient of 0.93) and levels (κ=0.888).

CONCLUSIONS

The scoring system is feasible and reliable. Defining polyp complexity levels may be useful for planning training, competency assessment and certification in colonoscopic polypectomy. This may allow for more efficient service delivery and referral pathways.

摘要

引言

如今,内镜医师需要常规进行息肉切除术。结肠息肉切除术的难度因息肉的形态、大小、位置和可达性而异。此前尚未描述过基于息肉特征来衡量息肉切除术难度程度的方法。

目的

确定息肉切除术的难度水平。

方法

通过德尔菲法达成了9位内镜医师关于决定息肉复杂性参数的共识。然后,内镜医师为每个可能的参数组合分配一个息肉复杂程度等级。由两位不同的内镜专家开发并验证了一种用于衡量息肉难度水平的评分系统。

结果

经过两轮德尔菲法,确定了决定息肉切除术复杂性的四个因素:大小(S)、形态(M)、部位(S)和可达性(A)。基于大小(1 - 9分)、形态(1 - 3分)、部位(1 - 2分)和可达性(1 - 3分)建立了一个评分系统。根据获得的分数范围确定了四个息肉等级(复杂性逐渐增加):I级(4 - 5分)、II级(6 - 9分)、III级(10 - 12分)和IV级(>12分)。息肉评分(组内相关系数为0.93)和等级(κ = 0.888)具有高度的评分者间信度。

结论

该评分系统可行且可靠。定义息肉复杂程度等级可能有助于规划结肠镜息肉切除术的培训、能力评估和认证。这可能会实现更高效的服务提供和转诊途径。

相似文献

1
A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy.一种确定结肠镜息肉切除术难度的新方法。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;4(4):244-248. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100331. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
2
Validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy.验证一种评估息肉切除术能力的新方法。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.028. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
3
Can endoscopists accurately self-assess performance during simulated colonoscopic polypectomy? A prospective, cross-sectional study.内镜医师能否在模拟结肠镜息肉切除术中准确地自我评估操作表现?一项前瞻性、横断面研究。
Am J Surg. 2014 Jan;207(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
4
Usefulness of a novel calibrated hood to determine indications for colon polypectomy: visual estimation of polyp size is not accurate.一种新型校准罩在确定结肠息肉切除适应症方面的效用:息肉大小的视觉估计并不准确。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;30(7):933-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2203-0. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
5
Endoscopic measurement of polyp size using a novel calibrated hood.使用新型校准罩进行息肉大小的内镜测量。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:714294. doi: 10.1155/2014/714294. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
Physician assessment and management of complex colon polyps: a multicenter video-based survey study.医生对复杂结肠息肉的评估和管理:一项基于多中心视频的调查研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1312-24. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.95. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
7
Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway - a nationwide survey.挪威胃肠病学家的息肉切除术技术——一项全国性调查。
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jul;6(7):E812-E820. doi: 10.1055/a-0607-0727. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
8
Learning from adverse outcomes: guidelines on colonoscopic polypectomy in patients aged 85 years and older.从不良结局中吸取教训:85岁及以上患者结肠镜息肉切除术指南
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul;7(3):199-201. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2014-100490. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
9
Risk stratification system for evaluation of complex polyps can predict outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection.用于评估复杂息肉的风险分层系统可以预测内镜黏膜切除术的结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Aug;56(8):960-6. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31829193e0.
10
Clinical implications of decision making in colorectal polypectomy: an international survey of Western endoscopists suggests priorities for change.结直肠息肉切除术决策的临床意义:一项针对西方内镜医师的国际调查提出了变革重点。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Mar;8(3):E445-E455. doi: 10.1055/a-1079-4298. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Overtreatment in colorectal cancer prevention: comparison between surgical and endoscopic treatment of benign colonic polyps.结直肠癌预防中的过度治疗:良性结肠息肉手术治疗与内镜治疗的比较
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 5;18:17562848251351214. doi: 10.1177/17562848251351214. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of Polypectomy Simulation-Based Mastery Learning on Skill Retention Among Practicing Endoscopists.基于息肉切除术模拟的掌握学习对实践内镜医生技能保持的影响。
Acad Med. 2024 Mar 1;99(3):317-324. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005538. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
3
New Model to Predict Recurrence After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-pedunculated Colonic Polyps ≥ 20 mm.一种预测非息肉状结肠息肉 ≥ 20 毫米内镜黏膜切除术后复发的新模型。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Oct;68(10):3935-3942. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08054-5. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
4
Unlocking quality in endoscopic mucosal resection.在内镜黏膜切除术中实现高质量切除。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May 16;15(5):338-353. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.338.
5
Difficult colorectal polypectomy: Technical tips and recent advances.困难性结直肠息肉切除术:技术要点与最新进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 May 7;29(17):2600-2615. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2600.
6
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in flexible sigmoidoscopy.乙状结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):181-200. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102259. eCollection 2023.
7
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):201-221. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102260. eCollection 2023.
8
Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies-a multi-centre observational study.多学科团队策略管理下复杂结直肠息肉的转归:一项多中心观察性研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Feb 3;38(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0.
9
The use of endocuff for the facilitation of endoscopic mucosal resection in defiant colonic polyps. A case series.使用内套圈辅助切除难治性结肠息肉的内镜黏膜切除术。病例系列。
Hippokratia. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3):134-137.
10
How to avoid overtreatment of benign colorectal lesions: Rationale for an evidence-based management.如何避免良性结直肠病变的过度治疗:基于证据的管理的理由。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 21;28(47):6619-6631. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6619.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy: direct observation of polypectomy skills.发展和验证一种评估息肉切除术能力的新方法:直接观察息肉切除术技能。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1232-9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.069.
2
Large refractory colonic polyps: is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service (with videos).巨大不可切除结肠息肉:是否该改变我们的治疗策略了?一项关于三级转诊结肠黏膜切除术和息肉切除术服务的临床和经济影响的前瞻性研究(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Dec;70(6):1128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.039. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
3
The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies.慕尼黑息肉切除术研究(MUPS):4000例结肠圈套息肉切除术并发症及危险因素的前瞻性分析
Endoscopy. 2005 Nov;37(11):1116-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870512.
4
A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists.临床胃肠病学家结肠镜息肉切除术实践的调查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep;60(3):414-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01808-5.
5
Endoscopic resection of large sessile colorectal polyps using a submucosal saline injection technique.使用黏膜下盐水注射技术对大肠广基大息肉进行内镜切除。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 May-Jun;44(15):698-702.
6
New methods of polypectomy.息肉切除术的新方法。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997 Jul;7(3):413-22.
7
Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy.结肠镜检查和乙状结肠镜检查的并发症。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996 Apr;6(2):343-77.
8
Tiny snares prove safe and effective for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps.微小圈套器在切除微小结直肠息肉方面被证明是安全有效的。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1994 May-Jun;40(3):301-3. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(94)70060-5.
9
Perforations from colonoscopy during diagnosis and treatment of polyps.结肠镜检查在息肉诊断和治疗过程中的穿孔。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1986;75(3):142-5.
10
Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: lessons to learn from an experience with 1576 polyps.结肠镜息肉切除术的并发症:从1576例息肉的经验中吸取的教训
Am Surg. 1988 Feb;54(2):61-3.