Suppr超能文献

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为系统性红斑狼疮患者感染诊断生物标志物的效用。

Usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a biomarker for diagnosing infections in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Nov;36(11):2479-2485. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3792-5. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

Abstract

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been investigated as disease activity markers for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Hence, we investigated the clinical significance of these parameters in diagnosing infection in patients with SLE. In total, 120 patients with SLE, who were admitted to hospital due to disease flares or infection, were recruited for the study. Of the 120 patients, 60 had a concurrent infection (SLE with infection), while the remaining 60 patients were admitted with a flare without any evidence of infection (SLE with flare). NLR was higher in the patients with SLE with infection, compared to patients with SLE with flare (14.2 ± 15.4 versus 3.3 ± 2.2, p < 0.001). Additionally, PLR was higher in the SLE with infection group than in the SLE with flare group (357.7 ± 350.1 versus 231.7 ± 152.9, p = 0.012), but not MLR. In the SLE with infection group, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels positively correlated with NLR and PLR. NLR with a cut-off value of 5.70 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872 indicated good sensitivity (75%) and specificity (90%), for the diagnosis of SLE with infection. CRP with a cut-off value of 1.28 mg/dL (AUC 0.942) showed the sensitivity (93.3%) and specificity (91.7%). NLR with a cut-off value of 5.70 and CRP with a cut-off value of 1.28 mg/dL showed the increased specificity (98.3%) than only CRP, but not significant. NLR could be a good additive marker for diagnosing infection in patients with SLE.

摘要

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)已被研究作为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的疾病活动标志物。因此,我们研究了这些参数在诊断 SLE 患者感染中的临床意义。共有 120 例因疾病活动或感染而住院的 SLE 患者被纳入研究。在这 120 例患者中,60 例并发感染(SLE 合并感染),而其余 60 例患者因疾病活动而无感染证据(SLE 合并活动)入院。SLE 合并感染患者的 NLR 高于 SLE 合并活动患者(14.2 ± 15.4 与 3.3 ± 2.2,p < 0.001)。此外,SLE 合并感染组的 PLR 高于 SLE 合并活动组(357.7 ± 350.1 与 231.7 ± 152.9,p = 0.012),但 MLR 无差异。在 SLE 合并感染组中,C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平与 NLR 和 PLR 呈正相关。NLR 的截断值为 5.70,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.872,对 SLE 合并感染的诊断具有良好的敏感性(75%)和特异性(90%)。CRP 的截断值为 1.28 mg/dL(AUC 0.942)时,其敏感性(93.3%)和特异性(91.7%)较高。NLR 的截断值为 5.70 和 CRP 的截断值为 1.28 mg/dL 时,特异性(98.3%)高于仅 CRP,但无统计学意义。NLR 可能是诊断 SLE 患者感染的一个良好附加标志物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验