Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚女性对在线或纸质调查问卷的使用:用户、设备及队列留存情况的纵向研究

Use of Online or Paper Surveys by Australian Women: Longitudinal Study of Users, Devices, and Cohort Retention.

作者信息

Fitzgerald David, Hockey Richard, Jones Mark, Mishra Gita, Waller Michael, Dobson Annette

机构信息

Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 14;21(3):e10672. doi: 10.2196/10672.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing use of online surveys to improve data quality and timeliness and reduce costs. While there have been numerous cross-sectional studies comparing responses to online or paper surveys, there is little research from a longitudinal perspective.

OBJECTIVE

In the context of the well-established Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, we examined the patterns of responses to online or paper surveys across the first two waves of the study in which both modes were offered. We compared the following: differences between women born between 1946 and 1951 and between 1973 and 1978; types of device used for online completion; sociodemographic, behavioral, and health characteristics of women who responded online or using mailed paper surveys; and associations between mode of completion in the first survey and participation and mode of completion in the second survey.

METHODS

Participants in this study, who had responded to regular mailed surveys since 1996, were offered a choice of completing surveys using paper questionnaires or Web-based electronic questionnaires starting in 2012. Two groups of women were involved: an older cohort born between 1946 and 1951 aged in their 60s and a younger cohort born between 1973 and 1978 aged in their 30s when the online surveys were first introduced. We compared women who responded online on both occasions, women who responded online at the first survey and used the paper version of the second survey, women who changed from paper to online, and those who used paper for both surveys.

RESULTS

Of the 9663 women in their 60s who responded to one or both surveys, more than 50% preferred paper surveys (5290/9663, 54.74%, on the first survey and 5373/8621, 62.32%, on the second survey). If they chose the online version, most used computers. In contrast, of the 8628 women in their 30s, 56.04% (4835/8628) chose the online version at the first survey. While most favored computers to phones or tablets, many did try these alternatives on the subsequent survey. Many women who completed the survey online the first time preferred the paper version on the subsequent survey. In fact, for women in their 60s, the number who went from online to paper (1151/3851, 29.89%) exceeded the number who went from paper to online (734/5290, 13.88%). The online option was more likely to be chosen by better educated and healthier women. In both cohorts, women who completed paper surveys were more likely than online completers to become nonrespondents on the next survey. Due to the large sample size, almost all differences were statistically significant, with P<.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the cost-saving advantages of online compared to paper surveys, paper surveys are likely to appeal to a different population of potential respondents with different sociodemographic, behavioral, and health characteristics and greater likelihood of attrition from the study. Not offering a paper version is therefore likely to induce bias in the distribution of responses unless weighting for respondent characteristics (relative to the target population) is employed. Therefore, if mixed mode (paper or online) options are feasible, they are highly likely to produce more representative results than if only the less costly online option is offered.

摘要

背景

在线调查在提高数据质量和及时性以及降低成本方面的应用日益广泛。虽然已有众多横断面研究比较了在线调查和纸质调查的回复情况,但从纵向角度进行的研究较少。

目的

在成熟的澳大利亚女性健康纵向研究背景下,我们考察了在研究的前两波中提供了两种方式(在线和纸质)时对在线或纸质调查的回复模式。我们比较了以下方面:1946年至1951年出生的女性与1973年至1978年出生的女性之间的差异;用于在线完成的设备类型;通过在线或邮寄纸质调查回复的女性的社会人口学、行为和健康特征;以及第一次调查的完成方式与参与情况和第二次调查的完成方式之间的关联。

方法

本研究的参与者自1996年以来一直回复定期邮寄的调查问卷,从2012年开始,她们可以选择使用纸质问卷或基于网络的电子问卷来完成调查。涉及两组女性:一组是1946年至1951年出生、60多岁的老年队列,另一组是1973年至1978年出生、在首次引入在线调查时30多岁的年轻队列。我们比较了两次都在线回复的女性、第一次调查在线回复而第二次调查使用纸质版的女性、从纸质改为在线的女性以及两次调查都使用纸质的女性。

结果

在回复了一次或两次调查的9663名60多岁女性中,超过50%更喜欢纸质调查(第一次调查为5290/9663,54.74%;第二次调查为5373/8621,62.32%)。如果她们选择在线版本,大多数使用电脑。相比之下,在8628名30多岁的女性中,56.04%(4835/8628)在第一次调查时选择了在线版本。虽然大多数人更喜欢用电脑而不是手机或平板电脑,但许多人在后续调查中确实尝试了这些替代方式。许多第一次在线完成调查的女性在后续调查中更喜欢纸质版本。事实上,对于60多岁的女性来说,从在线改为纸质的人数(1151/3851,29.89%)超过了从纸质改为在线的人数(734/5290,13.88%)。受教育程度更高、更健康的女性更有可能选择在线选项。在两个队列中,完成纸质调查的女性在下一次调查中比在线完成者更有可能不再回复。由于样本量较大,几乎所有差异都具有统计学意义,P<0.001。

结论

尽管与纸质调查相比,在线调查具有节省成本优势,但纸质调查可能对具有不同社会人口学、行为和健康特征且退出研究可能性更大的另一类潜在受访者有吸引力。因此,除非对受访者特征(相对于目标人群)进行加权,否则不提供纸质版本可能会导致回复分布出现偏差。所以,如果混合模式(纸质或在线)选项可行,与仅提供成本较低的在线选项相比,它们极有可能产生更具代表性的结果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Cohort Profile Update: Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.队列研究更新:澳大利亚女性健康纵向研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;44(5):1547,1547a-1547f. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv110. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验