1 Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
J Dent Res. 2018 Feb;97(2):171-178. doi: 10.1177/0022034517728496. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
This 30-mo randomized clinical trial compared the effectiveness of 2 concentrations (12% or 38%) of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and 2 periodicity of application (once or twice a year) in arresting cavitated dentin caries in primary teeth. Children aged 3 to 4 y who had at least 1 active cavitated caries lesion were enrolled and randomly allocated into 4 groups for intervention. Group 1 had 12% SDF applied annually (every 12 mo), group 2 had 12% SDF applied semiannually (every 6 mo), group 3 had 38% SDF applied annually, and group 4 had 38% SDF applied semiannually. Clinical examinations were performed semiannually in kindergarten by a single examiner to investigate whether the SDF-treated caries became arrested. A total of 888 children with 4,220 decayed tooth surfaces received SDF application at baseline, and 799 (90.0%) children with 3,790 surfaces (89.8%) were evaluated at the 30-mo examination. The caries arrest rates were 55.2%, 58.6%, 66.9%, and 75.7% for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively ( P < 0.001). Caries treated with 38% SDF had a higher chance of becoming arrested than those treated with 12% SDF (odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-2.60, P < 0.001). The interaction between frequency of SDF application and visible plaque index (VPI) score was significant ( P = 0.017). Among those children who received annual SDF application, children with a higher VPI score had a lower chance to have their caries become arrested (OR, 0.59, 95% CI, 0.49-0.72). In conclusion, SDF at a concentration of 38% is more effective than that of 12% in arresting active caries in primary teeth. For children with poor oral hygiene, caries arrest rate of SDF treatment can be increased by increasing the frequency of application from annually to semiannually ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02385474).
这项为期 30 个月的随机临床试验比较了两种浓度(12%或 38%)的银胺氟化物(SDF)和两种应用频率(每年一次或每半年一次)在阻止乳牙龋齿进展方面的效果。纳入年龄在 3 至 4 岁、至少有 1 个活跃性龋坏病变的儿童,并将其随机分为 4 组进行干预。第 1 组每年(每 12 个月)使用 12% SDF,第 2 组每半年(每 6 个月)使用 12% SDF,第 3 组每年使用 38% SDF,第 4 组每半年使用 38% SDF。由一名单一检查者在幼儿园每半年进行临床检查,以调查 SDF 治疗的龋齿是否停止进展。共有 888 名儿童的 4220 个患龋牙面在基线时接受了 SDF 治疗,其中 799 名(90.0%)儿童的 3790 个牙面(89.8%)在 30 个月的检查中得到了评估。各组的龋齿抑制率分别为 55.2%、58.6%、66.9%和 75.7%(P<0.001)。用 38% SDF 治疗的龋齿比用 12% SDF 治疗的龋齿更有可能被抑制(比值比[OR],1.98;95%置信区间[CI],1.51-2.60,P<0.001)。SDF 应用频率与可见菌斑指数(VPI)评分之间的交互作用有统计学意义(P=0.017)。在接受每年 SDF 应用的儿童中,VPI 评分较高的儿童其龋齿被抑制的可能性较低(OR,0.59,95%CI,0.49-0.72)。总之,浓度为 38%的 SDF 在阻止乳牙活跃龋方面比 12%的 SDF 更有效。对于口腔卫生较差的儿童,将 SDF 的应用频率从每年一次增加到每半年一次,可以提高 SDF 治疗的龋齿抑制率(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02385474)。