• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用“Surprise”问题预测腹膜透析患者 12 个月的死亡率。

Predicting 12-month mortality for peritoneal dialysis patients using the "surprise" question.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, PR China.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):60-6. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00204. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

DOI:10.3747/pdi.2011.00204
PMID:22855890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3598271/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies in hemodialysis patients suggest that the "surprise" question can help to identify a group of patients with a high mortality risk who should receive priority for palliative care interventions. However, the same instrument has not been tested in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

METHOD

We studied 367 prevalent PD patients from a single dialysis center. Three clinicians independently answered the "surprise" question (Would I be surprised if this patient died within the next 12 months?) according to their clinical impression of the individual patient. Patients are then classified into "yes" (yes, surprised) and "no" (no, not surprised) groups. All patients were followed for 12 months.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 109 patients (29.7%) were allocated to the "no" group, and 258 (70.3%), to the "yes" group. Patients in the "no" group were older and had high prevalences of pre-existing ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease. The "no" group had a higher score on the Charlson comorbidity index and a higher malnutrition-inflammation score. At 12 months, 44 patients had died. Mortality was 24.8% in the "no" group and 6.6% in the "yes" group. Multivariate analysis showed that an opinion of "Not surprised if dies in the next 12 months" was an independent predictor of 12-month mortality, with an associated 3.594 excess mortality risk (95% confidence interval: 1.411 to 9.151; p = 0.007). The positive predictive value of this opinion was 24.8%, and its negative predictive value was 93.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The "surprise" question has the potential to help identify a group of PD patients with high short-term mortality. Its use may contribute to a decision to refer PD patients for early palliative care assessment.

摘要

背景

在血液透析患者中的研究表明,“意外”问题可以帮助识别出一组死亡率较高的患者,这些患者应优先接受姑息治疗干预。然而,同样的工具尚未在腹膜透析(PD)患者中进行测试。

方法

我们研究了来自单一透析中心的 367 名现患 PD 患者。三位临床医生根据他们对个体患者的临床印象,独立回答“意外”问题(如果这位患者在未来 12 个月内死亡,我会感到惊讶吗?)。然后,患者被分为“是”(惊讶)和“否”(不惊讶)组。所有患者均随访 12 个月。

结果

在该队列中,有 109 名患者(29.7%)被分配到“否”组,258 名(70.3%)分到“是”组。“否”组患者年龄较大,且既往存在缺血性心脏病、脑血管病和外周血管疾病的患病率较高。“否”组患者的 Charlson 合并症指数评分较高,营养不良-炎症评分也较高。在 12 个月时,有 44 名患者死亡。“否”组的死亡率为 24.8%,“是”组为 6.6%。多变量分析显示,认为“如果在未来 12 个月内死亡,不会感到惊讶”是 12 个月死亡率的独立预测因素,相关的超额死亡风险为 3.594(95%置信区间:1.411 至 9.151;p = 0.007)。该意见的阳性预测值为 24.8%,阴性预测值为 93.4%。

结论

“意外”问题有可能帮助识别出一组短期死亡率较高的 PD 患者。它的使用可能有助于决定将 PD 患者转介进行早期姑息治疗评估。

相似文献

1
Predicting 12-month mortality for peritoneal dialysis patients using the "surprise" question.使用“Surprise”问题预测腹膜透析患者 12 个月的死亡率。
Perit Dial Int. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):60-6. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00204. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
2
Utility of the "surprise" question to identify dialysis patients with high mortality.“意外”问题在识别高死亡率透析患者中的效用。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Sep;3(5):1379-84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00940208. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
3
Association of Emergency Clinicians' Assessment of Mortality Risk With Actual 1-Month Mortality Among Older Adults Admitted to the Hospital.急诊医生评估死亡率与老年住院患者 1 个月实际死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911139. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11139.
4
Predicting transfer to haemodialysis using the peritoneal dialysis surprise question.使用腹膜透析意外问题预测转血液透析。
Perit Dial Int. 2024 Jan;44(1):16-26. doi: 10.1177/08968608231214143. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
5
Integrating the Surprise Question, Palliative Care Screening Tool, and Clinical Risk Models to Identify Peritoneal Dialysis Patients With High One-Year Mortality.整合意外问题、姑息治疗筛查工具和临床风险模型以识别腹膜透析一年高死亡率患者。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Sep;60(3):613-621.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.03.035. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
6
Predicting one-year mortality in heart failure using the 'Surprise Question': a prospective pilot study.使用“Surprise Question”预测心力衰竭患者一年死亡率:一项前瞻性试点研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;21(2):227-234. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1353. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
7
Analysis of risk factors and outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients with early-onset peritonitis: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study.分析早发性腹膜炎腹膜透析患者的风险因素和结局:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):e029949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029949.
8
Reliability and Utility of the Surprise Question in CKD Stages 4 to 5.4至5期慢性肾脏病中意外问题的可靠性和实用性
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Jul;70(1):93-101. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.025. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score as immune-nutritional predictor of outcomes in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.控制营养状况(CONUT)评分作为腹膜透析患者预后的免疫营养预测指标。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Aug;39(8):2564-2570. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
Is there impact of mortality prior hemodialysis therapy in peritoneal dialysis patients?腹膜透析患者行血液透析前死亡是否有影响?
Nefrologia. 2012 May 14;32(3):335-42. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2012.Jan.11143. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Surprise Question in Hemodialysis, Frailty, Nutrition, Patient-reported Quality of Life, and All-Cause Mortality: The Osaka Dialysis Complication Study (ODCS).血液透析、衰弱、营养、患者报告的生活质量及全因死亡率中的意外问题:大阪透析并发症研究(ODCS)
Kidney Med. 2024 Oct 11;6(12):100914. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100914. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.意外问题与临床医生预测的预后:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 25;15(1):12-35. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879.
3
The utility of the surprise question: A useful tool for identifying patients nearing the last phase of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.“惊讶问题”的实用性:识别生命末期患者的有用工具?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;36(7):1023-1046. doi: 10.1177/02692163221099116.
4
The Surprise Question as a Trigger for Primary Palliative Care Interventions for Children with Advanced Heart Disease.惊喜问题作为触发因素,用于对患有晚期心脏病的儿童进行初级姑息治疗干预。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Dec;43(8):1822-1831. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02919-8. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
Kidney Supportive Care in Peritoneal Dialysis: Developing a Person-Centered Kidney Disease Care Plan.腹膜透析中的肾脏支持性护理:制定以患者为中心的肾脏疾病护理计划。
Kidney Med. 2021 Dec 2;4(2):100392. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.10.005. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
Observational study of agreement between attending and trainee physicians on the surprise question: "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?".观察性研究:在“如果这个患者在接下来的 12 个月内去世,你会感到惊讶吗?”这个问题上,主治医生和住院医师之间的一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247571. eCollection 2021.
7
How Well Does the Surprise Question Predict 1-year Mortality for Patients Admitted with COPD?“惊讶问题”预测 COPD 患者 1 年死亡率的效果如何?
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2656-2662. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06512-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Association of Emergency Clinicians' Assessment of Mortality Risk With Actual 1-Month Mortality Among Older Adults Admitted to the Hospital.急诊医生评估死亡率与老年住院患者 1 个月实际死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911139. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11139.
9
Would You Be Surprised If This Patient Died This Year? Advance Care Planning in Substance Use Disorders.如果这位患者今年去世,你会感到惊讶吗?物质使用障碍的预先医疗照护计划。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2630-2633. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05223-z. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
The Surprise Question and Self-Rated Health Are Useful Screens for Frailty and Disability in Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease.《疑问筛选问题和自我评估健康状况在慢性肾脏病老年患者中用于筛查虚弱和残疾的效果》
J Palliat Med. 2019 Dec;22(12):1522-1529. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0054. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Neighborhood location, rurality, geography, and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States.美国腹膜透析患者的社区位置、农村性、地理位置和结局。
Perit Dial Int. 2012 May-Jun;32(3):322-31. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00084. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
2
Arterial pulse wave velocity and peritoneal transport characteristics independently predict hospitalization in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients.动脉脉搏波速度和腹膜转运特性独立预测中国腹膜透析患者的住院情况。
Perit Dial Int. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):80-5. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2008.00270.
3
Predicting six-month mortality for patients who are on maintenance hemodialysis.预测维持性血液透析患者的 6 个月死亡率。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jan;5(1):72-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03860609. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
4
Seven-year follow-up of peritoneal dialysis patients in Taiwan.台湾腹膜透析患者的七年随访
Perit Dial Int. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):450-7.
5
Utility of the "surprise" question to identify dialysis patients with high mortality.“意外”问题在识别高死亡率透析患者中的效用。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Sep;3(5):1379-84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00940208. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
6
How to manage elderly patients with chronic renal failure: conservative management versus dialysis.如何管理老年慢性肾衰竭患者:保守治疗与透析治疗对比
Blood Purif. 2008;26(1):36-40. doi: 10.1159/000110561. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
7
Adverse prognostic indicators in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients without obvious vascular or nutritional comorbidities.无明显血管或营养合并症的持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者的不良预后指标。
Perit Dial Int. 2003 Dec;23 Suppl 2:S109-15.
8
Dialysis or not? A comparative survival study of patients over 75 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5.透析与否?一项针对75岁以上慢性肾脏病5期患者的生存比较研究。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Jul;22(7):1955-62. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm153. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
9
Dialysis: when to start or when to stop?透析:何时开始或何时停止?
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Apr;19(4):1022. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh032.
10
Choosing not to dialyse: evaluation of planned non-dialytic management in a cohort of patients with end-stage renal failure.选择不进行透析:对一组终末期肾衰竭患者计划性非透析治疗的评估
Nephron Clin Pract. 2003;95(2):c40-6. doi: 10.1159/000073708.