• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机反应调查评估的两项精英田径比赛中的兴奋剂使用情况。

Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4.

DOI:10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4
PMID:28849386
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Doping in sports compromises fair play and endangers health. To deter doping among elite athletes, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) oversees testing of several hundred thousand athletic blood and urine samples annually, of which 1-2% test positive. Measures using the Athlete Biological Passport suggest a higher mean prevalence of about 14% positive tests. Biological testing, however, likely fails to detect many cutting-edge doping techniques, and thus the true prevalence of doping remains unknown.

METHODS

We surveyed 2167 athletes at two sporting events: the 13th International Association of Athletics Federations Word Championships in Athletics (WCA) in Daegu, South Korea in August 2011 and the 12th Quadrennial Pan-Arab Games (PAG) in Doha, Qatar in December 2011. To estimate the prevalence of doping, we utilized a "randomized response technique," which guarantees anonymity for individuals when answering a sensitive question. We also administered a control question at PAG assessing past-year use of supplements.

RESULTS

The estimated prevalence of past-year doping was 43.6% (95% confidence interval 39.4-47.9) at WCA and 57.1% (52.4-61.8) at PAG. The estimated prevalence of past-year supplement use at PAG was 70.1% (65.6-74.7%). Sensitivity analyses, assessing the robustness of these estimates under numerous hypothetical scenarios of intentional or unintentional noncompliance by respondents, suggested that we were unlikely to have overestimated the true prevalence of doping.

CONCLUSIONS

Doping appears remarkably widespread among elite athletes, and remains largely unchecked despite current biological testing. The survey technique presented here will allow future investigators to generate continued reference estimates of the prevalence of doping.

摘要

背景

运动中的兴奋剂使用行为破坏了公平竞赛的原则,危害了运动员的健康。为了遏制精英运动员的兴奋剂使用行为,世界反兴奋剂机构(WADA)每年对数十万份运动员的血液和尿液样本进行检测,其中 1-2%的样本呈阳性。运动员生物护照等措施表明,阳性检测的平均患病率约为 14%。然而,生物检测可能无法检测到许多尖端的兴奋剂技术,因此,兴奋剂的真实流行率仍然未知。

方法

我们在两个体育赛事中对 2167 名运动员进行了调查:2011 年 8 月在韩国大邱举行的第 13 届国际田径联合会世界田径锦标赛(WCA)和 2011 年 12 月在卡塔尔多哈举行的第 12 届四年度泛阿拉伯运动会(PAG)。为了估计兴奋剂的流行率,我们利用了“随机响应技术”,当个人回答敏感问题时,该技术可确保他们的匿名性。我们还在 PAG 上进行了一项控制问题调查,评估过去一年中使用补充剂的情况。

结果

WCA 上过去一年兴奋剂使用的估计患病率为 43.6%(95%置信区间 39.4-47.9),PAG 上的估计患病率为 57.1%(52.4-61.8)。PAG 上过去一年使用补充剂的估计患病率为 70.1%(65.6-74.7%)。敏感性分析评估了在受访者有意或无意不遵守规定的各种假设情况下,这些估计值的稳健性,结果表明我们不太可能高估了兴奋剂的真实流行率。

结论

兴奋剂在精英运动员中似乎非常普遍,尽管目前进行了生物检测,但仍然基本上没有得到遏制。这里提出的调查技术将使未来的研究人员能够继续生成兴奋剂流行率的参考估计值。

相似文献

1
Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys.随机反应调查评估的两项精英田径比赛中的兴奋剂使用情况。
Sports Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4.
2
Assessing the Prevalence of Doping Among Elite Athletes: An Analysis of Results Generated by the Single Sample Count Method Versus the Unrelated Question Method.评估精英运动员中使用兴奋剂的流行程度:单样本计数法与无关问题法所得结果的分析
Sports Med Open. 2023 Nov 28;9(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00658-5.
3
Prevalence of doping use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods.精英体育中使用兴奋剂的流行情况:数量与方法综述
Sports Med. 2015 Jan;45(1):57-69. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0247-x.
4
Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates previously reported for two major international sport events in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature.隐藏的数据:在更多实证证据和现有文献的背景下,重新审视先前报道的两项重大国际体育赛事的兴奋剂使用流行率估计。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Dec 5;4:1017329. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1017329. eCollection 2022.
5
Medication use in athletes selected for doping control at the Sydney Olympics (2000).2000年悉尼奥运会接受兴奋剂检查的运动员的用药情况。
Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Jan;13(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200301000-00007.
6
Prevalence of blood doping in samples collected from elite track and field athletes.精英田径运动员样本中血液兴奋剂的流行情况。
Clin Chem. 2011 May;57(5):762-9. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.156067. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
7
Randomized response estimates for doping and illicit drug use in elite athletes.随机应答估计在精英运动员中的兴奋剂和非法药物使用。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jan 15;106(2-3):230-2. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.026. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
8
[Anti-doping policy development process in the sports world (1968~1999): focusing on IOC activities and passive response from Korea].[体育界反兴奋剂政策的发展历程(1968年至1999年):聚焦国际奥委会的活动及韩国的被动应对]
Uisahak. 2014 Aug;23(2):269-318. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2014.23.269.
9
Worldwide distribution of blood values in elite track and field athletes: Biomarkers of altered erythropoiesis.世界范围内优秀田径运动员血液值分布:红细胞生成改变的生物标志物。
Drug Test Anal. 2019 Apr;11(4):567-577. doi: 10.1002/dta.2526. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
10
2011 lAAF World Championships in Daegu: blood tests for all athletes in the framework of the Athlete Biological Passport.2011年国际田联世界锦标赛在大邱举行:在运动员生物护照框架下对所有运动员进行血检。
Bioanalysis. 2012 Jul;4(13):1633-43. doi: 10.4155/bio.12.149.

引用本文的文献

1
Health and Performance Challenges in the Era of Human Enhancement: Insights from Sport Medicine Professionals.人类强化时代的健康与表现挑战:来自运动医学专业人士的见解
Sports Med. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02258-7.
2
Can the recent sex-specific evolutions in elite running performances be attributed to advanced footwear technology?精英跑步成绩最近出现的性别特异性演变能归因于先进的鞋类技术吗?
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 May 14;6:1386627. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1386627. eCollection 2024.
3
Qualitative analysis of the factors associated with whistleblowing intentions among athletes from six European countries.

本文引用的文献

1
Sport-Induced Substance Use-An Empirical Study to the Extent within a German Sports Association.运动诱导物质使用——对德国体育协会范围内程度的实证研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 26;11(10):e0165103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165103. eCollection 2016.
2
A Comparison of the Cheater Detection and the Unrelated Question Models: A Randomized Response Survey on Physical and Cognitive Doping in Recreational Triathletes.作弊检测模型与无关问题模型的比较:一项关于业余铁人三项运动员身体和认知兴奋剂使用情况的随机应答调查。
PLoS One. 2016 May 24;11(5):e0155765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155765. eCollection 2016.
3
Prevalence of Dietary Supplement Use by Athletes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
对来自六个欧洲国家的运动员举报意图相关因素的定性分析。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 May 7;6:1335258. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1335258. eCollection 2024.
4
Perceived Coach-Created Empowering and Disempowering Climate Effects on Athletes' Intentions to Use Doping: The Mediational Role of Self-Regulatory Efficacy and Attitudes towards Doping.感知到的教练营造的赋能和去能氛围对运动员使用兴奋剂意图的影响:自我调节效能和对兴奋剂态度的中介作用
Sports (Basel). 2024 Apr 1;12(4):100. doi: 10.3390/sports12040100.
5
DOPING CONTROL IN MALE SOCCER PLAYERS IN BRAZIL: 10 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP.巴西男足球员的兴奋剂检测:十年随访
Acta Ortop Bras. 2024 Mar 22;32(1):e273282. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220243201e273282. eCollection 2024.
6
Assessing the Prevalence of Doping Among Elite Athletes: An Analysis of Results Generated by the Single Sample Count Method Versus the Unrelated Question Method.评估精英运动员中使用兴奋剂的流行程度:单样本计数法与无关问题法所得结果的分析
Sports Med Open. 2023 Nov 28;9(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00658-5.
7
Performance-Enhancing Drugs in Healthy Athletes: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.健康运动员使用的兴奋剂:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞式综述。
Sports Health. 2024 Sep-Oct;16(5):695-705. doi: 10.1177/19417381231197389. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
8
Doping in Paralympic sport: perceptions, responsibility and anti-doping education experiences from the perspective of Paralympic athletes and parasport coaches.残奥会运动中的使用兴奋剂问题:从残奥会运动员和残疾人体育运动教练的角度看认知、责任及反兴奋剂教育经历
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jul 7;5:1166139. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1166139. eCollection 2023.
9
The analysis of randomized response "ever" and "last year" questions: A non-saturated Multinomial model.随机反应“曾经”和“去年”问题的分析:一种非饱和多项模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1335-1348. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02096-3. Epub 2023 May 10.
10
Adaptation and Validation of the Lithuanian Version of the Sport-Specific Doping Self-Regulatory Efficacy Scale.《运动专项兴奋剂自我调节效能感量表立陶宛语版的适应和验证》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 25;20(5):4158. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054158.
运动员使用膳食补充剂的患病率:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2016 Jan;46(1):103-123. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0387-7.
4
Gather data to reveal true extent of doping in sport.收集数据以揭示体育界使用兴奋剂的真实程度。
Nature. 2015 Jan 29;517(7536):529. doi: 10.1038/517529a.
5
Prevalence of doping use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods.精英体育中使用兴奋剂的流行情况:数量与方法综述
Sports Med. 2015 Jan;45(1):57-69. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0247-x.
6
Associations between physical and cognitive doping--a cross-sectional study in 2.997 triathletes.身体和认知兴奋剂之间的关联——对 2997 名三项全能运动员的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e78702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078702. eCollection 2013.
7
The Lance Armstrong saga: a wake-up call for drug reform in sports.兰斯·阿姆斯特朗事件:体育界药物改革的警钟。
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Mar-Apr;12(2):53-4. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31828952c6.
8
Asking sensitive questions: a statistical power analysis of randomized response models.询问敏感问题:随机反应模型的统计功效分析。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):623-41. doi: 10.1037/a0029314. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
9
Sports doping: Racing just to keep up.体育界的兴奋剂问题:只为跟上竞争步伐而参赛。
Nature. 2011 Jul 15;475(7356):283-5. doi: 10.1038/475283a.
10
Prevalence of blood doping in samples collected from elite track and field athletes.精英田径运动员样本中血液兴奋剂的流行情况。
Clin Chem. 2011 May;57(5):762-9. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.156067. Epub 2011 Mar 22.