Knapik Joseph J, Steelman Ryan A, Hoedebecke Sally S, Austin Krista G, Farina Emily K, Lieberman Harris R
US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, 10 General Greene Ave, Building 42, Natick, MA, 01760, USA.
US Army Public Health Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Gunpowder, MD, USA.
Sports Med. 2016 Jan;46(1):103-123. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0387-7.
Dietary supplements (DSs) are commercially available products consumed as an addition to the usual diet and are frequently ingested by athletes.
Our objective was to examine the prevalence of DS use by athletes.
PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, OVID Healthstar, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health were searched for original research articles published up to August 2014. Search terms included specific sports, specific DSs, and other terms.
Studies were selected if they were written in English, involved athletes, and provided a quantitative assessment of the proportion of athletes using specific DSs. Percent of athletes using specific DSs.
Methodological quality of studies was assessed by three reviewers using an 8-point scale that included evaluations for sampling methods, sampling frame, sample size, measurement tools, bias, response rate, statistical presentation, and description of the participant sample. Where there were at least two investigations, meta-analysis was performed to obtain summary (pooled) prevalence estimates (SPEs) on (1) DS use prevalence by sport and sex, (2) DS use prevalence by elite versus non-elite athletic status, and (3) specific DS prevalence for all athletic groups combined. Meta-analyses included evaluations of homogeneity and publication bias.
A total of 159 unique studies met the review criteria. Methodological quality was generally low with an average ± standard deviation of 43 ± 16% of available rating points. There was low homogeneity for SPEs when compiled by sport, athletic status, and/or specific DSs. Contributing to the lack of homogeneity were differences in studies' objectives and types of assessments used (e.g., dietary surveys, interviews, questionnaires). Despite these limitations, the data generally indicated that elite athletes used DSs much more than their non-elite counterparts. For most DSs, use prevalence was similar for men and women except that a larger proportion of women used iron while a larger proportion of men used vitamin E, protein, and creatine. No consistent change in use over time was observed because even the earliest investigations showed relatively high use prevalence.
It was difficult to generalize regarding DS use by athletes because of the lack of homogeneity among studies. Nonetheless, the data suggested that elite athletes used dietary supplements far more than their non-elite counterparts; use was similar for men and women with a few exceptions; use appeared to change little over time; and a larger proportion of athletes used DSs compared with the general US population. Improvements in study methodology should be considered in future studies especially (1) defining DSs for participants; (2) querying for very specific DSs; (3) using a variety of reporting timeframes (e.g., daily, 2-6 times/week, 1 time/week and <1 time/week); (4) reporting the sampling frame, number of individuals solicited, and number responding; (5) reporting characteristics of volunteers (and non-volunteers, if available); and (6) using similar methods on several occasions to examine possible temporal trends among athletes.
膳食补充剂(DSs)是作为日常饮食补充的市售产品,运动员经常食用。
我们的目的是研究运动员使用DSs的流行情况。
检索了PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、OVID Healthstar以及护理与联合健康累积索引,以查找截至2014年8月发表的原创研究文章。检索词包括特定运动项目、特定DSs以及其他术语。
入选的研究需满足用英文撰写、涉及运动员,并对使用特定DSs的运动员比例进行定量评估。使用特定DSs的运动员百分比。
由三位评审员使用8分制评估研究的方法学质量,该评估包括对抽样方法、抽样框架、样本量、测量工具、偏差、回复率、统计呈现以及参与者样本描述的评估。若至少有两项调查,则进行荟萃分析,以获取关于以下方面的汇总(合并)流行率估计值(SPEs):(1)按运动项目和性别划分的DSs使用流行率;(2)精英与非精英运动员身份的DSs使用流行率;(3)所有运动群体合并后的特定DSs流行率。荟萃分析包括对同质性和发表偏倚的评估。
共有159项独特研究符合评审标准。方法学质量普遍较低,可用评分点的平均±标准差为43±16%。按运动项目、运动员身份和/或特定DSs汇总时,SPEs的同质性较低。研究目的和所用评估类型(如饮食调查、访谈、问卷)的差异导致了缺乏同质性。尽管存在这些局限性,但数据总体表明,精英运动员使用DSs的频率远高于非精英运动员。对于大多数DSs,男性和女性的使用流行率相似,只是使用铁剂的女性比例较大,而使用维生素E、蛋白质和肌酸的男性比例较大。未观察到随时间的一致变化,因为即使是最早的调查也显示出相对较高的使用流行率。
由于研究之间缺乏同质性,难以对运动员使用DSs的情况进行概括。尽管如此,数据表明精英运动员使用膳食补充剂的频率远高于非精英运动员;男性和女性的使用情况相似,有少数例外;使用情况似乎随时间变化不大;与美国普通人群相比,使用DSs的运动员比例更大。未来的研究应考虑改进研究方法,特别是:(1)为参与者定义DSs;(2)询问非常具体的DSs;(3)使用多种报告时间框架(如每天、每周2 - 6次、每周1次和每周<1次);(4)报告抽样框架、被征求意见的个体数量和回复数量;(5)报告志愿者(以及非志愿者,如果有)的特征;(6)多次使用类似方法来研究运动员中可能的时间趋势。