• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估精英运动员中使用兴奋剂的流行程度:单样本计数法与无关问题法所得结果的分析

Assessing the Prevalence of Doping Among Elite Athletes: An Analysis of Results Generated by the Single Sample Count Method Versus the Unrelated Question Method.

作者信息

Ulrich Rolf, Cléret Léa, Comstock R Dawn, Kanayama Gen, Simon Perikles, Pope Harrison G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Leadership Trust Training and Development, Upper Granary, Brockhampton, HR4 1SE, UK.

出版信息

Sports Med Open. 2023 Nov 28;9(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00658-5.

DOI:10.1186/s40798-023-00658-5
PMID:38015291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10684448/
Abstract

In 2011, a group of researchers investigated the 12-month prevalence of doping at the 13th International Association of Athletics Federations World Championships in Athletics (WCA) in Daegu, South Korea, and also at the 12th Pan-Arab Games (PAG) in Doha, Qatar. The prevalence of doping at each event was estimated using an established randomized response method, the Unrelated Question Model (UQM). The study, published in 2018, found that the prevalence of past-year doping was at least 30% at WCA and 45% at PAG. At both events, separate data sets were collected in addition to the UQM data using a new method, the single sample count (SSC). Recently, Petróczi et al. have reported 12-month doping prevalence estimates for these two events based on the SSC data. These investigators obtained substantially lower prevalence estimates using the SSC and suggested that the 2018 estimates based on the UQM may have been too high. However, in this communication, we point out several possible shortcomings in the methods of Petróczi et al. and show that their SSC data would be equally compatible with a high 12-month doping prevalence comparable to the UQM estimates published in 2018.

摘要

2011年,一组研究人员调查了在韩国大邱举行的第13届国际田径联合会世界田径锦标赛(WCA)以及在卡塔尔多哈举行的第12届泛阿拉伯运动会(PAG)上使用兴奋剂的12个月流行率。使用一种既定的随机应答方法——无关问题模型(UQM)来估计每个赛事中使用兴奋剂的流行率。该研究于2018年发表,发现过去一年使用兴奋剂的流行率在世界田径锦标赛上至少为30%,在泛阿拉伯运动会上为45%。在这两项赛事中,除了使用无关问题模型数据外,还使用一种新方法——单样本计数(SSC)收集了单独的数据集。最近,彼得罗齐等人报告了基于单样本计数数据对这两项赛事的12个月兴奋剂流行率估计。这些研究人员使用单样本计数得到的流行率估计值要低得多,并认为基于无关问题模型的2018年估计值可能过高。然而,在本通讯中,我们指出了彼得罗齐等人方法中的几个可能缺点,并表明他们的单样本计数数据同样与高12个月兴奋剂流行率相符,这与2018年发表的无关问题模型估计值相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a194/10684448/63ac28fb179a/40798_2023_658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a194/10684448/63ac28fb179a/40798_2023_658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a194/10684448/63ac28fb179a/40798_2023_658_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Prevalence of Doping Among Elite Athletes: An Analysis of Results Generated by the Single Sample Count Method Versus the Unrelated Question Method.评估精英运动员中使用兴奋剂的流行程度:单样本计数法与无关问题法所得结果的分析
Sports Med Open. 2023 Nov 28;9(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00658-5.
2
Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys.随机反应调查评估的两项精英田径比赛中的兴奋剂使用情况。
Sports Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4.
3
Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates previously reported for two major international sport events in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature.隐藏的数据:在更多实证证据和现有文献的背景下,重新审视先前报道的两项重大国际体育赛事的兴奋剂使用流行率估计。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Dec 5;4:1017329. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1017329. eCollection 2022.
4
Physical and cognitive doping in university students using the unrelated question model (UQM): Assessing the influence of the probability of receiving the sensitive question on prevalence estimation.大学生使用无关问题模型(UQM)的身体和认知兴奋剂:评估接受敏感问题的概率对患病率估计的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 May 15;13(5):e0197270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197270. eCollection 2018.
5
A Comparison of the Cheater Detection and the Unrelated Question Models: A Randomized Response Survey on Physical and Cognitive Doping in Recreational Triathletes.作弊检测模型与无关问题模型的比较:一项关于业余铁人三项运动员身体和认知兴奋剂使用情况的随机应答调查。
PLoS One. 2016 May 24;11(5):e0155765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155765. eCollection 2016.
6
Prevalence Estimate of Blood Doping in Elite Track and Field Athletes During Two Major International Events.两项重大国际赛事期间精英田径运动员血液兴奋剂使用情况的患病率估计
Front Physiol. 2020 Feb 25;11:160. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00160. eCollection 2020.
7
Medication use in athletes selected for doping control at the Sydney Olympics (2000).2000年悉尼奥运会接受兴奋剂检查的运动员的用药情况。
Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Jan;13(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200301000-00007.
8
Worldwide distribution of blood values in elite track and field athletes: Biomarkers of altered erythropoiesis.世界范围内优秀田径运动员血液值分布:红细胞生成改变的生物标志物。
Drug Test Anal. 2019 Apr;11(4):567-577. doi: 10.1002/dta.2526. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
The development of decision limits for the GH-2000 detection methodology using additional insulin-like growth factor-I and amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen assays.使用额外的胰岛素样生长因子-I和III型胶原氨基末端前肽检测法制定GH-2000检测方法的决策限。
Drug Test Anal. 2015 Sep;7(9):745-55. doi: 10.1002/dta.1772. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Annual Banned-Substance Review 17th Edition-Analytical Approaches in Human Sports Drug Testing 2023/2024.《年度禁用物质审查第17版——2023/2024年人类运动药物检测中的分析方法》
Drug Test Anal. 2025 Aug;17(8):1417-1442. doi: 10.1002/dta.3835. Epub 2024 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates previously reported for two major international sport events in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature.隐藏的数据:在更多实证证据和现有文献的背景下,重新审视先前报道的两项重大国际体育赛事的兴奋剂使用流行率估计。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Dec 5;4:1017329. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1017329. eCollection 2022.
2
Doping in Two Elite Athletics Competitions Assessed by Randomized-Response Surveys.随机反应调查评估的两项精英田径比赛中的兴奋剂使用情况。
Sports Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4.
3
Prevalence of Dietary Supplement Use by Athletes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
运动员使用膳食补充剂的患病率:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2016 Jan;46(1):103-123. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0387-7.
4
Estimating the prevalence of socially sensitive behaviors: attributing guilty and innocent noncompliance with the single sample count method.估算社会敏感行为的流行率:归因于单一样本计数法的有罪和无罪不遵守行为。
Psychol Methods. 2014 Sep;19(3):334-55. doi: 10.1037/a0034961. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
5
New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone.一种新的非随机模型评估歧视行为的流行程度:对甲卡西酮的初步研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011 Aug 3;6:20. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-6-20.
6
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.短期记忆中的神奇数字4:对心理存储容量的重新思考
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x01003922.
7
How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.良好契合度有多具说服力?对理论检验的评论。
Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):358-67. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.358.