Levesque Jean-Frederic, Sutherland Kim
Bureau of Health Information, BHI, Chatswood, New South Wales, Australia.
Centre for Primary Health care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e014825. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014825.
Across healthcare systems, there is consensus on the need for independent and impartial assessment of performance. There is less agreement about how measurement and reporting performance improves healthcare. This paper draws on academic theories to develop a conceptual framework-one that classifies in an integrated manner the ways in which change can be leveraged by healthcare performance information.
A synthesis of published frameworks.
The framework identifies eight levers for change enabled by performance information, spanning internal and external drivers, and emergent and planned processes: (1) cognitive levers provide awareness and understanding; (2) mimetic levers inform about the performance of others to encourage emulation; (3) supportive levers provide facilitation, implementation tools or models of care to actively support change; (4) formative levers develop capabilities and skills through teaching, mentoring and feedback; (5) normative levers set performance against guidelines, standards, certification and accreditation processes; (6) coercive levers use policies, regulations incentives and disincentives to force change; (7) structural levers modify the physical environment or professional cultures and routines; (8) competitive levers attract patients or funders.
This framework highlights how performance measurement and reporting can contribute to eight different levers for change. It provides guidance into how to align performance measurement and reporting into quality improvement programme.
在整个医疗体系中,对于独立且公正的绩效评估的必要性已达成共识。然而,对于衡量和报告绩效如何改善医疗服务,人们的意见却不太一致。本文借鉴学术理论来构建一个概念框架,该框架以综合的方式对医疗绩效信息可用于推动变革的方式进行分类。
对已发表的框架进行综合分析。
该框架确定了绩效信息可推动变革的八个杠杆,涵盖内部和外部驱动因素以及突发和计划中的流程:(1)认知杠杆提供意识和理解;(2)模仿杠杆告知他人的绩效以鼓励效仿;(3)支持杠杆提供便利、实施工具或护理模式以积极支持变革;(4)形成性杠杆通过教学、指导和反馈来培养能力和技能;(5)规范杠杆对照指南、标准、认证和认可流程设定绩效;(6)强制杠杆使用政策、法规激励措施和抑制措施来迫使变革;(7)结构杠杆改变物理环境或专业文化及常规;(8)竞争杠杆吸引患者或资助者。
该框架突出了绩效衡量和报告如何能为八个不同的变革杠杆做出贡献。它为如何将绩效衡量和报告与质量改进计划相结合提供了指导。