Suppr超能文献

手术治疗患者中孤立性内侧和外侧半月板撕裂患病率的年龄差异

Age Differences in the Prevalence of Isolated Medial and Lateral Meniscal Tears in Surgically Treated Patients.

作者信息

Ridley T J, McCarthy Mark A, Bollier Matthew J, Wolf Brian R, Amendola Annunziato

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Eau Claire, WI.

出版信息

Iowa Orthop J. 2017;37:91-94.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the prevalence of isolated lateral and medial meniscal tears in different aged populations.

METHODS

A five-year retrospective review for meniscal procedures performed on a total of 782 patients. Each chart was reviewed to document the prevalence of medial or lateral meniscal injuries. Inclusion criteria were patients found to have documented evidence of meniscal tear, either lateral or medial, without any concomitant injuries and/or any other procedures performed. Patients excluded from the study were those with concomitant pathologies, such as chondromalacia, malalignment or ligamentous injuries. Patients were classified by age into three groups: < 20 years, 20-30 years and > 30 years old.

RESULTS

68.7% of patients had medial meniscal tears, (average age 37.6 years), 17.1% of these were isolated medial meniscus injuries (average 31.9 years). 31.3% had lateral meniscal injuries (average 27.7 years). Of these, 18.8 % had isolated lateral meniscal injuries (average 22.8 years). All remaining patients had additional diagnoses/procedures. Isolated medial meniscal injuries were more common in older patients as 48 of the 92 isolated medial tears (52.2%) were found in patients > 30 years of age (p <0.001). Isolated lateral meniscal injuries, on the other hand, were more common in younger patients. 29 of the 46 isolated lateral tears (63%) occurred in patients under 20 years (p = 0.002). Only seven (15.2%) isolated lateral tears were shown in patients older than 30 years.

CONCLUSION

Isolated lateral meniscal tears are more common in patients < 20 years, and decrease with age, while the prevalence of medial meniscal tears increase with age.

摘要

目的

比较不同年龄人群中单纯外侧和内侧半月板撕裂的发生率。

方法

对总共782例患者进行的半月板手术进行为期五年的回顾性研究。查阅每份病历以记录内侧或外侧半月板损伤的发生率。纳入标准为发现有外侧或内侧半月板撕裂的记录证据,且无任何合并伤和/或未进行任何其他手术。排除患有合并病变(如软骨软化、排列不齐或韧带损伤)的患者。患者按年龄分为三组:<20岁、20 - 30岁和>30岁。

结果

68.7%的患者有内侧半月板撕裂(平均年龄37.6岁),其中17.1%为单纯内侧半月板损伤(平均31.9岁)。31.3%有外侧半月板损伤(平均27.7岁)。其中,18.8%为单纯外侧半月板损伤(平均22.8岁)。其余所有患者都有其他诊断/手术。单纯内侧半月板损伤在老年患者中更常见,因为在92例单纯内侧撕裂中有48例(52.2%)发生在>30岁患者中(p<0.001)。另一方面,单纯外侧半月板损伤在年轻患者中更常见。46例单纯外侧撕裂中有29例(63%)发生在20岁以下患者中(p = 0.002)。只有7例(15.2%)单纯外侧撕裂出现在30岁以上患者中。

结论

单纯外侧半月板撕裂在<20岁患者中更常见,且随年龄增长而减少,而内侧半月板撕裂的发生率随年龄增长而增加。

相似文献

5
Comparison of Medial and Lateral Meniscus Root Tears.内侧半月板根部撕裂与外侧半月板根部撕裂的比较
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0141021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141021. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

7
Surgical Management of Traumatic Meniscus Injuries.创伤性半月板损伤的手术治疗
Pathophysiology. 2023 Dec 4;30(4):618-629. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology30040044.

本文引用的文献

2
A systematic review of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing meniscectomy.半月板切除术患者临床结局的系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1907-16. doi: 10.1177/0363546510370196. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
4
An anatomical study of meniscal allograft sizing.半月板同种异体移植尺寸的解剖学研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 Mar;12(2):130-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0366-7. Epub 2003 May 20.
5
Meniscal injury: I. Basic science and evaluation.半月板损伤:I. 基础科学与评估
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002 May-Jun;10(3):168-76. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200205000-00003.
7
The menisci: basic science and advances in treatment.半月板:基础科学与治疗进展
Br J Sports Med. 2000 Aug;34(4):252-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.4.252.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验