Suppr超能文献

用于肱动脉和股动脉血流介导的血管扩张的自动化系统的内部验证。

Internal validation of an automated system for brachial and femoral flow mediated dilation.

作者信息

Ratcliffe Brycen, Pawlak Robert, Morales Francisco, Harrison Caleb, Gurovich Alvaro N

机构信息

Department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana State University, Sycamore Center for Wellness & Applied Medicine, 567 North 5th Street, Terre Haute, IN 47809 USA.

出版信息

Clin Hypertens. 2017 Aug 22;23:17. doi: 10.1186/s40885-017-0073-1. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) has immense potential to become a clinical, non-invasive biomarker of endothelial function and nitric oxide bioavailability, which regulate vasomotor activity. Unfortunately, FMD analysis techniques could deviate significantly in different laboratories if a validation process is not involved. The purpose of this study was to provide validation to the assessment of FMD analysis in our laboratory and to standardize this process before reporting results of FMD.

METHODS

Brachial and femoral arteries FMD were performed on 28 apparently healthy participants (15 male and 13 female, ages 18-35 years). For the intratester reliability study, nine subjects were asked to come to the lab for a second brachial FMD within 48 h. All FMD procedures were performed by the same investigator, while the FMD analyses were performed by 2 independent testers who were blind to each other's analyses. FMD analyses included baseline artery diameter measurements, peak artery diameter after 5 min of ischemia, and FMD. Analysis was completed via an automated edge detection system by both testers after training of the methodical process of analysis to minimize variability. Intratester and intertester reliability were determined by using coefficient of variation (CV) between first and second visit (intratester) and between results obtained by both testers (intertester).

RESULTS

The intratester CVs for tester 1 and 2 were 3.28 and 2.62%, 3.74 and 3.27%, and 4.95 and 2.38% for brachial baseline artery diameter, brachial peak artery dilation, and brachial FMD, respectively. In the intertester CVs were 2.40, 3.16, and 3.37% for brachial baseline artery diameter, peak artery dilation, and FMD, respectively and 4.52, 5.50, and 3.46% for femoral baseline artery diameter, peak artery dilation, and FMD, respectively.

CONCLUSION

All CVs were under or around 5%, confirming a strong reliability of the method. Our laboratory has shown that the FMD protocol is reproducible due to the significantly low coefficient of variation. This is one step closer to use FMD as a biomarker for endothelial function in our laboratory.

摘要

背景

血流介导的血管舒张功能(FMD)极有可能成为一种临床非侵入性生物标志物,用于评估调节血管舒缩活动的内皮功能和一氧化氮生物利用度。遗憾的是,如果不经过验证过程,不同实验室的FMD分析技术可能会有显著差异。本研究旨在对我们实验室FMD分析评估进行验证,并在报告FMD结果之前规范这一过程。

方法

对28名看似健康的参与者(15名男性和13名女性,年龄18 - 35岁)进行肱动脉和股动脉FMD检测。对于测试者内部可靠性研究,9名受试者被要求在48小时内到实验室进行第二次肱动脉FMD检测。所有FMD检测程序均由同一名研究人员执行,而FMD分析由2名相互不知情的独立测试人员进行。FMD分析包括基线动脉直径测量、缺血5分钟后的动脉峰值直径以及FMD。在对分析方法流程进行训练以尽量减少变异性后,两名测试人员均通过自动边缘检测系统完成分析。通过使用第一次和第二次就诊之间(测试者内部)以及两名测试人员所得结果之间(测试者之间)的变异系数(CV)来确定测试者内部和测试者之间的可靠性。

结果

测试者1和测试者2在肱动脉基线动脉直径、肱动脉峰值动脉扩张和肱动脉FMD方面的测试者内部CV分别为3.28%和2.62%、3.74%和3.27%、4.95%和2.38%。在测试者之间,肱动脉基线动脉直径、峰值动脉扩张和FMD的CV分别为2.40%、3.16%和3.37%,股动脉基线动脉直径、峰值动脉扩张和FMD的CV分别为4.52%、5.50%和3.46%。

结论

所有CV均在5%或5%左右以下,证实了该方法具有很强的可靠性。我们实验室已表明,由于变异系数极低,FMD检测方案具有可重复性。这使我们离在实验室中将FMD用作内皮功能生物标志物又近了一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cd2/5568717/1d4821a97a3d/40885_2017_73_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验