Suppr超能文献

不同浓度的根提取物与0.2%氯己定和青霉素对……的抗菌效果(括号内内容缺失)

Antibacterial Effects of Different Concentrations of Root Extract versus 0.2% Chlorhexidine and Penicillin on and ().

作者信息

Haghgoo Roza, Mehran Majid, Afshari Elahe, Zadeh Hamide Farajian, Ahmadvand Motahare

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Science, Kermanshah, Iran.

出版信息

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Jul-Aug;7(4):180-185. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_150_17. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aims of the present study were to determine and compare the effects of different concentrations of extract, 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX), and penicillin on and .

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The laboratory study was done, for a period of 8 weeks. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in the test tube, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) in a plate culture medium, and growth inhibition zone diameter methods were used to compare the antibacterial effects of 0.2% CHX, penicillin, and different concentrations of root extract. The data were analyzed by SPSS version 24 using ANOVA and -test analysis.

RESULTS

The results showed root extract had antibacterial effect, but significant differences were in MIC and MBC against and with penicillin and 0.2% CHX mouthwash. In addition, the mean growth inhibition zones of all the concentrations of the plant extract were less than that of the positive control group ( = 0.001). However, the difference in the maximum growth inhibition zone from that with the negative control group was significant. In addition, the antibacterial effect of the extract increased with an increase in its concentration. The extract exerted a greater antibacterial effect on than on . The plant polyphenols content is 3.7% which is equivalent to 29.93 g/ml.

CONCLUSION

The root extract of exhibited antibacterial effects on and , but this effect was less than those of CHX mouthwash and penicillin. The antibacterial effect increased with an increase in the concentration of the extract.

摘要

目的与目标

本研究的目的是确定并比较不同浓度的提取物、0.2%氯己定(CHX)和青霉素对[具体对象1]和[具体对象2]的影响。

材料与方法

进行了为期8周的实验室研究。采用试管中的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)、平板培养基中的最低杀菌浓度(MBC)以及生长抑制圈直径法来比较0.2% CHX、青霉素和不同浓度的[植物名称]根提取物的抗菌效果。使用SPSS 24版通过方差分析和[具体检验方法]分析对数据进行分析。

结果

结果表明[植物名称]根提取物具有抗菌作用,但在针对[具体对象1]和[具体对象2]的MIC和MBC方面,与青霉素和0.2% CHX漱口水存在显著差异。此外,所有浓度的植物提取物的平均生长抑制圈均小于阳性对照组(P = 0.001)。然而,与阴性对照组相比,最大生长抑制圈的差异具有显著性。此外,提取物的抗菌效果随其浓度的增加而增强。提取物对[具体对象1]的抗菌作用比对[具体对象2]的更强。植物多酚含量为3.7%,相当于29.93微克/毫升。

结论

[植物名称]根提取物对[具体对象1]和[具体对象2]具有抗菌作用,但这种作用小于CHX漱口水和青霉素。抗菌效果随提取物浓度的增加而增强。

相似文献

1
Antibacterial Effects of Different Concentrations of Root Extract versus 0.2% Chlorhexidine and Penicillin on and ().
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Jul-Aug;7(4):180-185. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_150_17. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
2
Comparison Between Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Different Concentrations of Extract: An Study.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;7(5):242-246. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_157_17. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
3
The antibacterial effects of coffee extract, chlorhexidine, and fluoride against and : An study.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Sep 5;16(5):346-353. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.
5
9
Antibacterial activity of garlic extract on cariogenic bacteria: An study.
Ayu. 2018 Jul-Sep;39(3):165-168. doi: 10.4103/ayu.AYU_193_16.
10
Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of Propolis and its Application in Mouthwash Production.
Front Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;16(1):1-12. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i1.1103. Epub 2019 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Formulation and Evaluation of a Licorice-Resveratrol Lollipop for Targeting Biofilm and Antimicrobial Resistance.
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Aug 7;18:3933-3946. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S537534. eCollection 2025.
2
The Antimicrobial Activity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles incorporated into Alginate Impression Material: An Study.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024 Dec 27;14(6):497-505. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_112_24. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
3
Mechanical Properties of Poly(Alkenoate) Cement Modified with Propolis as an Antiseptic.
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Mar 28;15(7):1676. doi: 10.3390/polym15071676.
6
Application of Antibiotics/Antimicrobial Agents on Dental Caries.
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 31;2020:5658212. doi: 10.1155/2020/5658212. eCollection 2020.
8
Antimicrobial Effects of Egyptian Local Chicory, subsp.
Int J Microbiol. 2018 Nov 4;2018:6475072. doi: 10.1155/2018/6475072. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of antioxidant, antimicrobial activities and chemical profiles of three coffee ( L.) pulp aqueous extracts.
Integr Med Res. 2016 Dec;5(4):324-331. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
2
Mechanism of Creaming Down Based on Chemical Characterization of a Complex of Caffeine and Tea Catechins.
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2016;64(7):676-86. doi: 10.1248/cpb.c16-00131.
3
The Antibacterial Activity of Date Syrup Polyphenols against S. aureus and E. coli.
Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 26;7:198. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00198. eCollection 2016.
5
Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation, extracellular polysaccharide production, and virulence by an oxazole derivative.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Jan;100(2):857-67. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7092-1. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 13;2015(4):CD008457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008457.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验