Nazeri Rahman, Ghaiour Marzieh, Abbasi Shima
Faculty of Dentistry, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Front Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;16(1):1-12. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i1.1103. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
Our purpose was to determine the antibacterial properties of propolis and to evaluate its use as an antibacterial mouthwash with minimal complications.
In this experimental laboratory study, an alcoholic propolis extract was prepared. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was calculated for four bacterial species including (), (), (), and () using agar dilution. According to the MIC, a propolis antibacterial mouthwash was produced and compared to water, chlorhexidine (CHX), and Listerine using laboratory rats for clinical examination. Salivary specimens of rats were collected at 12 hours, 1 week, and 2 weeks after using the mouthwash and examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures ANOVA (α=0.05).
The results of agar dilution by the number of colony-forming units showed the lowest MIC for and the highest for . Our RT-PCR findings indicated that water alone had no effect on the level of oral bacteria. Propolis mouthwash showed a significant difference with CHX and Listerine (P<0.05) in terms of the number of , , and colonies, while CHX and Listerine were less efficient. There was no significant difference between CHX and propolis (P=0.110) regarding colonies, but Listerine had a lower efficacy than either (P<0.05).
According to the results, propolis mouthwash was more efficient against the studied oral bacteria compared to CHX and Listerine.
我们的目的是确定蜂胶的抗菌特性,并评估其作为一种并发症最少的抗菌漱口水的用途。
在这项实验性实验室研究中,制备了蜂胶乙醇提取物。使用琼脂稀释法计算了包括()、()、()和()在内的四种细菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。根据MIC,制备了一种蜂胶抗菌漱口水,并使用实验室大鼠进行临床检查,与水、氯己定(CHX)和李斯德林漱口水进行比较。在使用漱口水后的12小时、1周和2周收集大鼠的唾液样本,并通过实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)进行检测。数据采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和重复测量方差分析(α=0.05)进行分析。
通过菌落形成单位数量进行琼脂稀释的结果显示,()的MIC最低,()的MIC最高。我们的RT-PCR结果表明,仅用水对口腔细菌水平没有影响。在()、()和()菌落数量方面,蜂胶漱口水与CHX和李斯德林漱口水相比有显著差异(P<0.05),而CHX和李斯德林漱口水的效果较差。在()菌落方面,CHX和蜂胶之间没有显著差异(P=0.110),但李斯德林漱口水的效果低于两者(P<0.05)。
根据结果,与CHX和李斯德林漱口水相比,蜂胶漱口水对所研究的口腔细菌更有效。