Longo Daniele L, Fumes Ana C, Küchler Erika C, Paula-Silva Francisco W G, Nelson-Filho Paulo, Silva Léa A B
Departamento de Clínica Infantil, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brasil.
Dent Traumatol. 2018 Feb;34(1):12-19. doi: 10.1111/edt.12365. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Tooth avulsion consists of the complete displacement of a tooth from the alveolar socket. When immediate replantation is not possible, the avulsed tooth should be kept in a storage medium capable of maintaining the viability of periodontal ligament (PDL) cells on the root surface. However, there is no consensus on the best storage medium able to prevent sequels such as ankylosis and tooth resorption. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the in vivo effectiveness of different storage media for avulsed teeth.
Two reviewers performed a database search for studies published between January 1950 and December 2015 which were indexed in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Bireme databases. An additional manual search was performed. Studies with animal models that evaluated tooth avulsion, storage media, and replantation were included. After full-text analysis of the potentially relevant studies, the selected studies were included in the systematic review.
The database search found 157 distinct studies evaluating avulsed teeth storage media. However, only six studies met the selection criteria and were included in the review. There was a high variability in the study estimates for the parameters analyzed. When assessing the quality and level of evidence of each study, one study was rated as having a very low level of evidence, four studies had low levels of evidence, and one had a moderate level of evidence.
As a result of data heterogeneity and limitations of the studies, there was insufficient evidence to determine the most effective storage medium for avulsed teeth.
背景/目的:牙脱位是指牙齿从牙槽窝中完全脱出。若无法立即再植,脱出的牙齿应保存在能维持牙根表面牙周膜(PDL)细胞活力的储存介质中。然而,对于哪种储存介质能最佳地预防诸如牙根粘连和牙齿吸收等后遗症,尚无共识。本研究的目的是进行一项系统评价,以评估不同储存介质对脱出牙齿的体内有效性。
两名评价者在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Bireme数据库中检索1950年1月至2015年12月发表的研究。另外进行了手工检索。纳入评估牙脱位、储存介质和再植的动物模型研究。在对潜在相关研究进行全文分析后,将选定的研究纳入系统评价。
数据库检索发现157项评估脱出牙齿储存介质的不同研究。然而,只有六项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入评价。所分析参数的研究估计值存在很大差异。在评估每项研究的质量和证据水平时,一项研究被评为证据水平极低,四项研究证据水平低,一项研究证据水平中等。
由于数据的异质性和研究的局限性,没有足够的证据来确定最有效的脱出牙齿储存介质。