使用快速接种系统评估厌氧微量稀释法的最低抑菌浓度（MIC）结果。
Evaluation of anaerobic microdilution MIC results with the Prompt Inoculation System.
作者信息
Mangels J I
出版信息
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Jun;25(6):1140-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.6.1140-1142.1987.
The Prompt Inoculation System (3M Co.) was compared with the overnight suspension inoculation procedure used with a broth microdilution anaerobic commercial system (Micro-Media Systems) for differences in MIC. MIC results from both suspension methods using six National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards-recommended quality control organisms were identical in 18 instances (75%) and within +/- 1 log2 dilution in 96% of the comparisons. Results with 45 anaerobic clinical isolates also compared satisfactorily; 83% of the results were identical and 97% were within +/- 1 log2 dilution. In addition, the direct (Prompt)-inoculated microdilution trays produced better growth and more valid MIC results; 92% of the clinical isolates produced MIC results versus 79% by the overnight suspension procedure.
将即时接种系统（3M公司）与使用肉汤微量稀释厌氧商业系统（微媒体系统）的过夜悬液接种程序进行比较，以观察最低抑菌浓度（MIC）的差异。使用六种美国国家临床实验室标准委员会推荐的质量控制微生物，两种悬液法的MIC结果在18例（75%）中相同，在96%的比较中相差不超过±1个log2稀释度。对45株厌氧临床分离株的检测结果也比较令人满意；83%的结果相同，97%相差不超过±1个log2稀释度。此外，直接（即时）接种的微量稀释板生长更好，MIC结果更有效；92%的临床分离株得出了MIC结果，而过夜悬液法为79%。
Zotero 插件