Jones R N, Barry A L, Cotton J L, Sutter V L, Swenson J M
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Aug;16(2):245-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.2.245-249.1982.
The Micro-Media Systems (MMS) anaerobe susceptibility testing panel results from four laboratories were compared for interlaboratory and intralaboratory variations and for the results with the reference agar dilution and a broth microdilution method. The interlaboratory agreement was 98.0% and intralaboratory agreement was 97.3% (+/- 1 log2 dilution). When interpretive criteria for each antimicrobial agent (susceptible, intermediate, and resistant) were assigned, the MMS anaerobic minimum inhibitory concentration data showed an interpretive accuracy of 91.0 and 95.5% for comparisons to the reference agar dilution and the broth methods, respectively. Most significant interpretive errors were considered minor, and nearly half of all errors involved tetracycline, a drug rarely used for serious anaerobic infections. The MMS anaerobe panels appear to be acceptable for selected use in clinical microbiology laboratories.
对来自四个实验室的微媒体系统(MMS)厌氧菌药敏试验结果进行了比较,以分析实验室间和实验室内的差异,以及与参考琼脂稀释法和肉汤微量稀释法的结果对比。实验室间的一致性为98.0%,实验室内的一致性为97.3%(±1个对数2稀释度)。当为每种抗菌药物(敏感、中介和耐药)指定解释标准时,MMS厌氧最低抑菌浓度数据与参考琼脂稀释法和肉汤法相比,解释准确率分别为91.0%和95.5%。大多数显著的解释错误被认为是轻微的,并且几乎所有错误的一半涉及四环素,这是一种很少用于严重厌氧菌感染的药物。MMS厌氧菌药敏板似乎可用于临床微生物实验室的特定用途。