Suppr超能文献

体液(唾液、汗液和泪液)的评估和检查与血液和尿液中的生化水合评估标志物的比较。

Evaluation and review of body fluids saliva, sweat and tear compared to biochemical hydration assessment markers within blood and urine.

机构信息

Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Landquart/Manno, Switzerland.

THIM University of Applied Sciences, Landquart, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jan;72(1):69-76. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.136. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

Abstract

Evaluating and testing hydration status is increasingly requested by rehabilitation, sport, military and performance-related activities. Besides commonly used biochemical hydration assessment markers within blood and urine, which have their advantages and limitations in collection and evaluating hydration status, there are other potential markers present within saliva, sweat or tear. This literature review focuses on body fluids saliva, sweat and tear compared to blood and urine regarding practicality and hydration status influenced by fluid restriction and/or physical activity. The selected articles included healthy subjects, biochemical hydration assessment markers and a well-described (de)hydration procedure. The included studies (n=16) revealed that the setting and the method of collecting respectively accessing body fluids are particularly important aspects to choose the optimal hydration marker. To obtain a sample of saliva is one of the simplest ways to collect body fluids. During exercise and heat exposures, saliva composition might be an effective index but seems to be highly variable. The collection of sweat is a more extensive and time-consuming technique making it more difficult to evaluate dehydration and to make a statement about the hydration status at a particular time. The collection procedure of tear fluid is easy to access and causes very little discomfort to the subject. Tear osmolarity increases with dehydration in parallel to alterations in plasma osmolality and urine-specific gravity. But at the individual level, its sensitivity has to be further determined.

摘要

评估和测试水合状态越来越多地受到康复、运动、军事和与表现相关的活动的要求。除了血液和尿液中常用的具有收集和评估水合状态的优点和局限性的生化水合评估标志物外,唾液、汗液或眼泪中还有其他潜在的标志物。本文综述重点关注与血液和尿液相比,唾液、汗液和眼泪在实际应用中的情况,以及液体限制和/或体力活动对水合状态的影响。所选文章纳入了健康受试者、生化水合评估标志物以及描述良好的(去)水合程序。纳入的研究(n=16)表明,分别采集和获取体液的环境和方法是选择最佳水合标志物的特别重要的方面。获取唾液样本是收集体液的最简单方法之一。在运动和热暴露期间,唾液成分可能是一个有效的指标,但似乎变化很大。汗液的采集是一种更广泛和耗时的技术,因此更难以评估脱水情况并对特定时间的水合状态做出陈述。泪液采集过程容易进行,对受试者几乎没有不适。泪液渗透压随着脱水而增加,与血浆渗透压和尿比重的变化平行。但在个体水平上,还需要进一步确定其敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c35c/5765170/df100682415b/ejcn2017136f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验