• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intersectoral approaches and integrated services in achieving the right to health for refugees upon resettlement: a scoping review protocol.重新安置难民实现健康权过程中的跨部门方法与综合服务:一项范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 30;7(8):e016638. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016638.
2
Intersectoral and integrated approaches in achieving the right to health for refugees on resettlement: a scoping review.实现重新安置难民健康权的跨部门和综合方法:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 1;9(7):e029407. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029407.
3
A scoping review on the barriers to and facilitators of health services utilisation related to refugee settlement in regional or rural areas of the host country.以目的国的地区或农村地区的难民定居为背景,对与卫生服务利用相关的障碍和促进因素进行的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17694-9.
4
Barriers and facilitators to access mental health services among refugee women in high-income countries: study protocol for a systematic review.高收入国家中难民女性获得心理健康服务的障碍和促进因素:系统评价研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 16;9(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01446-y.
5
Barriers to and facilitators of health services utilisation by refugees in resettlement countries: an overview of systematic reviews.难民在安置国利用卫生服务的障碍与促进因素:系统评价综述
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Feb;44(1):132-142. doi: 10.1071/AH18108.
6
Barriers and facilitators to access mental health services among refugee women in high-income countries: a systematic review.高收入国家难民女性获得心理健康服务的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 6;11(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01936-1.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Opportunities and practices supporting responsive health care for forced migrants: lessons from transnational practice and a mixed-methods systematic review.支持为被迫移民提供响应式医疗服务的机遇与实践:跨国实践经验及混合方法系统评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(13):1-182. doi: 10.3310/MRWK3419.
9
Primary health care with refugees: between the idea and the reality.为难民提供的初级卫生保健:理想与现实之间
Trop Doct. 1985 Jan;15(1):2-7. doi: 10.1177/004947558501500102.
10
Homestay Hosting Dynamics and Refugee Well-Being: Protocol for a Scoping Review.寄宿家庭接待动态与难民福祉:一项范围审查的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 19;13:e56242. doi: 10.2196/56242.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing an integrated intervention to address intimate partner violence and psychological distress in Congolese refugee women in Tanzania.制定一项综合干预措施,以解决坦桑尼亚刚果难民妇女中的亲密伴侣暴力和心理困扰问题。
Confl Health. 2019 Aug 17;13:38. doi: 10.1186/s13031-019-0222-0. eCollection 2019.
2
Intersectoral and integrated approaches in achieving the right to health for refugees on resettlement: a scoping review.实现重新安置难民健康权的跨部门和综合方法:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 1;9(7):e029407. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029407.

本文引用的文献

1
Refugees: towards better access to health-care services.难民:迈向更好地获得医疗保健服务
Lancet. 2016 Jan 23;387(10016):319-321. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00101-X.
2
Accelerating health equity: the key role of universal health coverage in the Sustainable Development Goals.加速健康公平:全民健康覆盖在可持续发展目标中的关键作用。
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 29;13:101. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0342-3.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
4
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well-being of torture survivors.针对酷刑幸存者心理健康和福祉的心理、社会及福利干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 11;2014(11):CD009317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009317.pub2.
5
A narrative synthesis of the impact of primary health care delivery models for refugees in resettlement countries on access, quality and coordination.在重新安置国家中,对难民初级卫生保健提供模式的影响进行叙述性综合,以评估其对获取、质量和协调性的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Nov 7;12:88. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-88.
6
Migration and health in an increasingly diverse Europe.日益多元化的欧洲中的移民与健康。
Lancet. 2013 Apr 6;381(9873):1235-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62086-8. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
7
Integration of targeted health interventions into health systems: a conceptual framework for analysis.将目标性卫生干预措施融入卫生系统:分析的概念框架。
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Mar;25(2):104-11. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp055. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
8
'Doing' health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges.进行健康政策分析:方法与概念的思考及挑战
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):308-17. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn024.
9
Access to health care for asylum seekers in the European Union--a comparative study of country policies.欧盟寻求庇护者的医疗保健服务——各国政策的比较研究
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Jun;16(3):286-90. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki191. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
10
Internally displaced peoples in Bosnia-Herzegovina: impacts of long-term displacement on health and well-being.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的境内流离失所者:长期流离失所对健康和福祉的影响。
Med Confl Surviv. 2005 Jul-Sep;21(3):199-215. doi: 10.1080/13623690500166028.

重新安置难民实现健康权过程中的跨部门方法与综合服务:一项范围审查方案

Intersectoral approaches and integrated services in achieving the right to health for refugees upon resettlement: a scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Javadi Dena, Langlois Etienne V, Ho Shirley, Friberg Peter, Tomson Göran

机构信息

Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Swedish Institute for Global Health Transformation (SIGHT), Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 30;7(8):e016638. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016638.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016638
PMID:28855201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5629659/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Global insecurity and climate change are exacerbating the need for improved management of refugee resettlement services. International standards hold states responsible for the protection of the right of non-citizens to an adequate standard of physical and mental health while recognising the importance of social determinants of health. However, programmes to protect refugees' right to health often lack coordination and monitoring. This paper describes the protocol for a scoping review to explore barriers and facilitators to the integration of health services for refugees; the content, process and actors involved in protecting refugee health; and the extent to which intersectoral approaches are leveraged to protect refugees' right to health on resettlement, especially for vulnerable groups such as women and children.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Peer-reviewed (through four databases including MEDLINE, Web of Science, Global Health and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched to identify programmes and interventions designed to promote refugee health in receiving countries. Two reviewers will screen articles and abstract data. Two frameworks for integration and intersectoral action will be applied to understand how and why certain approaches work while others do not and to identify the actors involved in achieving success at different levels of integration as defined by these frameworks.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Findings from the scoping review will be shared in relevant conferences and meetings. A brief will be created with lessons learnt from successful programmes to inform decision making in design of refugee programmes and services. Ethical approval is not required as human subjects are not involved.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Registered on Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/gt9ck/.

摘要

引言

全球不安全因素和气候变化加剧了改善难民重新安置服务管理的需求。国际标准要求各国负责保护非公民享有适足身心健康标准的权利,同时认识到健康的社会决定因素的重要性。然而,保护难民健康权的方案往往缺乏协调和监测。本文描述了一项范围审查的方案,以探讨为难民整合卫生服务的障碍和促进因素;保护难民健康所涉及的内容、过程和行为主体;以及在重新安置过程中,特别是针对妇女和儿童等弱势群体,利用部门间方法保护难民健康权的程度。

方法与分析

通过四个数据库(包括MEDLINE、科学网、全球健康和PsycINFO)进行同行评审,并搜索灰色文献,以确定旨在促进接收国难民健康的方案和干预措施。两名评审员将筛选文章和摘要数据。将应用两个整合和部门间行动框架,以了解某些方法为何有效而其他方法无效,并确定在这些框架所定义的不同整合层面上取得成功所涉及的行为主体。

伦理与传播

范围审查的结果将在相关会议上分享。将编写一份简报,总结成功方案的经验教训,为设计难民方案和服务提供决策参考。由于不涉及人类受试者,因此无需伦理批准。

试验注册号

在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/gt9ck/)上注册。