Peiper Nicholas C, Gourdet Camille, Meinhofer Angélica, Reiman Amanda, Reggente Nicco
Behavioral Health and Criminal Justice Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Public Health Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Subst Abuse. 2017 Aug 21;11:1178221817725515. doi: 10.1177/1178221817725515. eCollection 2017.
Most cannabis patients engage with dispensary staff, like budtenders, for medical advice on cannabis. Yet, little is known about these interactions and how the characteristics of budtenders affect these interactions. This study investigated demographics, workplace characteristics, medical decision-making, and online behaviors among a sample of budtenders.
Between June and September 2016, a cross-sectional Internet survey was administered to budtenders in the San Francisco Bay Area and Greater Los Angeles. A total of 158 budtenders fully responded to the survey. A series of comparisons were conducted to determine differences between trained and untrained budtenders.
Among the 158 budtenders, 56% had received formal training to become a budtender. Several demographic differences were found between trained and untrained budtenders. For workplace characteristics, trained budtenders were more likely to report budtender as their primary job (74% vs 53%), practice more than 5 years (34% vs 11%), and receive sales commission (57% vs 16%). Trained budtenders were significantly less likely to perceive medical decision-making as very important (47% vs 68%) and have a patient-centered philosophy (77% vs 89%). Although trained budtenders had significantly lower Internet usage, they were significantly more likely to exchange information with patients through e-mail (58% vs 39%), text message (46% vs 30%), mobile app (33% vs 11%), video call (26% vs 3%), and social media (51% vs 23%).
Budtenders who are formally trained exhibit significantly different patterns of interaction with medical cannabis patients. Future studies will use multivariate methods to better determine which factors independently influence interactions and how budtenders operate after the introduction of regulations under the newly passed Proposition 64 that permits recreational cannabis use in California.
大多数大麻患者会与药房工作人员(如大麻导购员)交流,以获取有关大麻的医疗建议。然而,对于这些互动以及大麻导购员的特征如何影响这些互动,我们知之甚少。本研究调查了大麻导购员样本的人口统计学、工作场所特征、医疗决策制定和在线行为。
2016年6月至9月期间,对旧金山湾区和大洛杉矶地区的大麻导购员进行了一项横断面互联网调查。共有158名大麻导购员对调查进行了全面回复。进行了一系列比较,以确定经过培训和未经培训的大麻导购员之间的差异。
在158名大麻导购员中,56%接受过成为大麻导购员的正式培训。在经过培训和未经培训的大麻导购员之间发现了一些人口统计学差异。在工作场所特征方面,经过培训的大麻导购员更有可能将大麻导购员作为其主要工作(74%对53%),从业超过5年(34%对11%),并获得销售佣金(57%对16%)。经过培训的大麻导购员认为医疗决策非常重要的可能性显著降低(47%对68%),并且以患者为中心的理念也显著降低(77%对89%)。尽管经过培训的大麻导购员的互联网使用率显著较低,但他们通过电子邮件(58%对39%)、短信(46%对30%)、移动应用程序(33%对11%)、视频通话(26%对3%)和社交媒体(51%对23%)与患者交流信息的可能性显著更高。
接受过正式培训的大麻导购员与医用大麻患者的互动模式存在显著差异。未来的研究将使用多变量方法,以更好地确定哪些因素独立影响互动,以及在新通过的第64号提案(该提案允许在加利福尼亚州使用娱乐用大麻)实施监管后,大麻导购员将如何开展工作。