Nagler Rebekah H, Franklin Fowler Erika, Gollust Sarah E
*Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN †Department of Government, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT ‡Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN.
Med Care. 2017 Oct;55(10):879-885. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000798.
Scientists, clinicians, and other experts aim to maximize the benefits of cancer screening while minimizing its harms. Chief among these harms are overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Although available data suggest that patient awareness of these harms is low, we know little about how patients respond to information about these phenomena.
Using the case of breast cancer screening, this study assesses women's awareness of and reactions to statements about overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
We draw on data from a 2016 population-based survey of US women aged 35-55 years that oversampled women of lower socioeconomic position (those living at or below 100% of federal poverty level) (N=429).
Results showed that women's awareness of overdiagnosis (16.5%) and overtreatment (18.0%) was low, and women under age 40 were least likely to have heard about overdiagnosis. Most women did not evaluate statements about these harms positively: <1 in 4 agreed with and found statements about overdiagnosis and overtreatment to be believable, and even fewer evaluated them as strong arguments to consider in their own mammography decision making. Women with a recent mammogram history were particularly unconvinced by overdiagnosis and overtreatment arguments.
A majority of women were unaware of 2 important harms of breast cancer screening: overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Most did not find statements about these harms to be believable and persuasive. Communication interventions, supported by evidence from health communication research, are necessary to improve patient understanding of screening's harms, promote informed decision making, and, in turn, ensure high-value care.
科学家、临床医生和其他专家旨在使癌症筛查的益处最大化,同时将其危害最小化。这些危害中最主要的是过度诊断和过度治疗。尽管现有数据表明患者对这些危害的知晓率较低,但我们对患者如何回应有关这些现象的信息知之甚少。
以乳腺癌筛查为例,本研究评估女性对过度诊断和过度治疗相关陈述的知晓情况及反应。
我们利用了2016年一项针对35 - 55岁美国女性的基于人群的调查数据,该调查对社会经济地位较低的女性(生活在联邦贫困线及以下100%的人群)进行了过度抽样(N = 429)。
结果显示,女性对过度诊断(16.5%)和过度治疗(18.0%)的知晓率较低,40岁以下的女性最不可能听说过过度诊断。大多数女性对这些危害的陈述评价不积极:不到四分之一的人同意并认为关于过度诊断和过度治疗的陈述可信,甚至更少有人将其视为在自己的乳房X光检查决策中需要考虑的有力论据。近期有乳房X光检查史的女性对过度诊断和过度治疗的论据尤其不信服。
大多数女性未意识到乳腺癌筛查的两个重要危害:过度诊断和过度治疗。大多数人认为关于这些危害的陈述不可信且缺乏说服力。基于健康传播研究证据的沟通干预对于提高患者对筛查危害的理解、促进明智决策以及进而确保高价值医疗是必要的。