Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 8;12(6):e061211. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061211.
To explore experiences of women who identified themselves as having a possible breast cancer overdiagnosis.
Qualitative interview study using key components of a grounded theory analysis.
International interviews with women diagnosed with breast cancer and aware of the concept of overdiagnosis.
Twelve women aged 48-77 years from the UK (6), USA (4), Canada (1) and Australia (1) who had breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ n=9, (invasive) breast cancer n=3) diagnosed between 2004 and 2019, and who were aware of the possibility of overdiagnosis. Participants were recruited via online blogs and professional clinical networks.
Most women (10/12) became aware of overdiagnosis after their own diagnosis. All were concerned about the possibility of overdiagnosis or overtreatment or both. Finding out about overdiagnosis/overtreatment had negative psychosocial impacts on women's sense of self, quality of interactions with medical professionals, and for some, had triggered deep remorse about past decisions and actions. Many were uncomfortable with being treated as a cancer patient when they did not feel 'diseased'. For most, the recommended treatments seemed excessive compared with the diagnosis given. Most found that their initial clinical teams were not forthcoming about the possibility of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, and many found it difficult to deal with their set management protocols.
The experiences of this small and unusual group of women provide rare insight into the profound negative impact of finding out about overdiagnosis after breast cancer diagnosis. Previous studies have found that women valued information about overdiagnosis before screening and this knowledge did not reduce subsequent screening uptake. Policymakers and clinicians should recognise the diversity of women's perspectives and ensure that women are adequately informed of the possibility of overdiagnosis before screening.
探讨自我诊断为可能患有乳腺癌过度诊断的女性的体验。
使用扎根理论分析的关键组成部分进行定性访谈研究。
对国际上诊断出乳腺癌并意识到过度诊断概念的女性进行访谈。
12 名年龄在 48-77 岁的女性,来自英国(6 名)、美国(4 名)、加拿大(1 名)和澳大利亚(1 名),她们在 2004 年至 2019 年间被诊断出患有乳腺癌(导管原位癌 n=9,浸润性乳腺癌 n=3),并意识到过度诊断的可能性。参与者通过在线博客和专业临床网络招募。
大多数女性(10/12)在自己诊断后才意识到过度诊断。所有女性都担心过度诊断或过度治疗的可能性,或者两者兼而有之。了解过度诊断/过度治疗对女性的自我意识、与医疗专业人员的互动质量产生了负面影响,对一些人来说,还引发了对过去决定和行为的深深悔恨。许多人在没有感到“患病”时,不希望被视为癌症患者。对大多数人来说,推荐的治疗方法与给出的诊断相比似乎过于激进。大多数人发现,他们最初的临床团队并没有坦诚地告知过度诊断和过度治疗的可能性,许多人发现很难处理他们的既定管理方案。
这一小群特殊女性的经历罕见地深入了解了乳腺癌诊断后发现过度诊断的深远负面影响。先前的研究发现,女性在筛查前重视有关过度诊断的信息,而这些知识并没有降低随后的筛查参与率。政策制定者和临床医生应认识到女性观点的多样性,并确保在筛查前充分告知女性过度诊断的可能性。