Jokubauskas L, Baltrušaitytė A, Pileičikienė G
Faculty of Odontology, Department of Prosthodontics, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Jan;45(1):81-95. doi: 10.1111/joor.12558. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
The review focuses on the last decade of research regarding the use of various oral appliances (OAs) in the management of sleep bruxism (SB) in adults. Sixteen (n = 16) papers of 641 identified citations involving 398 participants were included in the review. Of them, seven were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), seven were uncontrolled before-after studies and two were crossover trials. Analysis of the included articles revealed a high variability of study designs and findings. Generally, the risk of bias was low-to-unclear for RCTs and high for crossover studies, whilst the before-after studies exhibited several structural limitations. Nine studies used polysomnography/polygraphy/electromyography for SB diagnosis, whilst others were based on history taking and clinical examination. Most of them featured small samples and were short term. Of the studies using objective SB evaluations, eight showed positive results for almost every type of OA in reducing SB activity, with a higher decrease for devices that are designed to provide a certain extent of mandibular advancement. Among the studies using a subjective SB evaluation, one demonstrated a significant reduction in SB activity, and additional two showed a myorelaxant effect of OA in SB patients. Although many positive studies support the efficiency of OA treatment for SB, accepted evidence is insufficient to support its role in the long-term reduction of SB activity. Further studies with larger samples and sufficient treatment periods are needed to obtain more acknowledgements for clinical application.
这篇综述聚焦于过去十年中关于使用各种口腔矫治器(OA)治疗成人睡眠磨牙症(SB)的研究。在检索到的641篇相关文献中,筛选出16篇(n = 16)涉及398名参与者的论文纳入综述。其中,七篇为随机对照试验(RCT),七篇为非对照前后研究,两篇为交叉试验。对纳入文章的分析显示,研究设计和结果的变异性很大。一般来说,RCT的偏倚风险为低到不明确,交叉研究的偏倚风险高,而前后研究存在一些结构上的局限性。九项研究使用多导睡眠图/多导记录图/肌电图进行SB诊断,其他研究则基于病史采集和临床检查。大多数研究样本量小且为短期研究。在使用客观SB评估的研究中,八项研究表明几乎每种类型的OA在降低SB活动方面都有积极结果,对于旨在提供一定程度下颌前伸的装置,降低幅度更大。在使用主观SB评估的研究中,一项研究表明SB活动显著降低,另外两项研究表明OA对SB患者有肌松弛作用。尽管许多积极的研究支持OA治疗SB的有效性,但现有证据不足以支持其在长期降低SB活动中的作用。需要进行更大样本量和足够治疗周期的进一步研究,以获得更多临床应用方面的认可。