• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与整脊手法相关的颈动脉夹层:一家机构的经验。

Cervical artery dissection related to chiropractic manipulation: One institution's experience.

作者信息

Kennell Kelly A, Daghfal Megan M, Patel Shyam G, DeSanto Jeffery R, Waterman G Scott, Bertino Raymond E

机构信息

University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL, USA.

William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 2017 Sep;66(9):556-562.

PMID:28863201
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of patients seen at a single institution who were diagnosed with a cervical vessel dissection related to chiropractic neck manipulation.

METHODS

We identified cases through a retrospective chart review of patients seen between April 2008 and March 2012 who had a diagnosis of cervical artery dissection following a recent chiropractic manipulation. Relevant imaging studies were reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist to confirm the findings of a cervical artery dissection and stroke. We conducted telephone interviews to ascertain the presence of residual symptoms in the affected patients.

RESULTS

Of the 141 patients with cervical artery dissection, 12 had documented chiropractic neck manipulation prior to the onset of the symptoms that led to medical presentation. The 12 patients had a total of 16 cervical artery dissections. All 12 patients developed symptoms of acute stroke. All strokes were confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography. We obtained follow-up information on 9 patients, 8 of whom had residual symptoms and one of whom died as a result of his injury.

CONCLUSION

In this case series, 12 patients with newly diagnosed cervical artery dissection(s) had recent chiropractic neck manipulation. Patients who are considering chiropractic cervical manipulation should be informed of the potential risk and be advised to seek immediate medical attention should they develop symptoms.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定在单一机构就诊的、被诊断为与整脊颈部手法治疗相关的颈动脉夹层的患者的发生率。

方法

我们通过对2008年4月至2012年3月期间就诊的患者进行回顾性病历审查来确定病例,这些患者在近期接受整脊手法治疗后被诊断为颈动脉夹层。由一名获得董事会认证的神经放射科医生对相关影像学研究进行审查,以确认颈动脉夹层和中风的诊断结果。我们进行电话访谈以确定受影响患者中残留症状的存在情况。

结果

在141例颈动脉夹层患者中,有12例在导致就医的症状发作前有整脊颈部手法治疗的记录。这12例患者共有16处颈动脉夹层。所有12例患者均出现急性中风症状。所有中风均通过磁共振成像或计算机断层扫描得以确诊。我们获得了9例患者的随访信息,其中8例有残留症状,1例因伤死亡。

结论

在这个病例系列中,12例新诊断为颈动脉夹层的患者近期接受了整脊颈部手法治疗。考虑接受整脊颈部手法治疗的患者应被告知潜在风险,并被建议如果出现症状应立即寻求医疗救治。

相似文献

1
Cervical artery dissection related to chiropractic manipulation: One institution's experience.与整脊手法相关的颈动脉夹层:一家机构的经验。
J Fam Pract. 2017 Sep;66(9):556-562.
2
Craniocervical arterial dissections as sequelae of chiropractic manipulation: patterns of injury and management.颈椎动脉夹层是整脊手法的后遗症:损伤模式与处理。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;115(6):1197-205. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.JNS111212. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
3
Clinical perceptions of the risk of vertebral artery dissection after cervical manipulation: the effect of referral bias.颈椎手法治疗后椎动脉夹层风险的临床认知:转诊偏倚的影响。
Spine J. 2002 Sep-Oct;2(5):334-42. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00411-4.
4
Chiropractic sympathectomy: carotid artery dissection with oculosympathetic palsy after chiropractic manipulation of the neck.整脊交感神经切除术:颈部整脊手法治疗后颈动脉夹层伴动眼神经交感神经麻痹。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2005 May;72(3):207-10.
5
Risk of stroke after chiropractic spinal manipulation in medicare B beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years with neck pain.66至99岁患有颈部疼痛的医疗保险B部分受益人群接受脊椎按摩疗法后中风的风险
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Feb;38(2):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
6
[Wallenberg's syndrome secondary to dissection of the vertebral artery caused by chiropractic manipulation].[因整脊手法导致椎动脉夹层引起的延髓背外侧综合征]
Rev Neurol. 2003;37(9):837-9.
7
Safety of chiropractic interventions: a systematic review.整脊疗法干预的安全性:一项系统评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2475-6; author reply 2476-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b96cbe.
8
Cervical artery dissection--clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients.126例颈内动脉夹层——临床特征、危险因素、治疗及预后
J Neurol. 2003 Oct;250(10):1179-84. doi: 10.1007/s00415-003-0174-5.
9
Simultaneous bilateral internal carotid and vertebral artery dissection following chiropractic manipulation: case report and review of the literature.整脊手法治疗后双侧颈内动脉和椎动脉同时发生夹层:病例报告及文献复习
Neuroradiology. 2003 May;45(5):311-4. doi: 10.1007/s00234-003-0944-x. Epub 2003 Apr 12.
10
Risk of Carotid Stroke after Chiropractic Care: A Population-Based Case-Crossover Study.整脊治疗后颈动脉中风的风险:一项基于人群的病例交叉研究。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Apr;26(4):842-850. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Plausible Mechanisms of Causation of Immediate Stroke by Cervical Spine Manipulation: A Narrative Review.颈椎推拿导致即刻卒中的可能致病机制:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56565. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56565. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Cervical Spine Manipulations: Role of Diagnostic Procedures, Effectiveness, and Safety from a Rehabilitation and Forensic Medicine Perspective: A Systematic Review.颈椎手法治疗:从康复医学和法医学角度看诊断程序的作用、有效性及安全性:一项系统综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 23;12(5):1056. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051056.
3
Thoracic spine thrust manipulation for individuals with cervicogenic headache: a crossover randomized clinical trial.
胸椎推扳手法治疗颈源性头痛的随机交叉临床试验。
J Man Manip Ther. 2022 Apr;30(2):78-95. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2021.1947663. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
4
Complementary and Integrative Medicine for Episodic Migraine: an Update of Evidence from the Last 3 Years.补充和整合医学治疗发作性偏头痛:最近 3 年证据更新。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Feb 21;23(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0750-8.
5
Vertebral Artery Dissection in Active-Duty Soldier Due to Mixed Martial Arts Choke Hold.现役军人因综合格斗窒息技导致椎动脉夹层。
Fed Pract. 2018 Jul;35(7):12-17.
6
Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury.钝性脑血管损伤的处理。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Oct 23;18(12):98. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0906-7.