Schlatter Daniel C, Yin Chuntao, Hulbert Scot, Burke Ian, Paulitz Timothy
USDA-ARS, Wheat Health, Genetics and Quality Research Unit, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Oct 31;83(22). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01354-17. Print 2017 Nov 15.
Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide worldwide and a critical tool for weed control in no-till cropping systems. However, there are concerns about the nontarget impacts of long-term glyphosate use on soil microbial communities. We investigated the impacts of repeated glyphosate treatments on bacterial communities in the soil and rhizosphere of wheat in soils with and without long-term history of glyphosate use. We cycled wheat in the greenhouse using soils from 4 paired fields under no-till (20+-year history of glyphosate) or no history of use. At each cycle, we terminated plants with glyphosate (2× the field rate) or by removing the crowns, and soil and rhizosphere bacterial communities were characterized. Location, cropping history, year, and proximity to the roots had much stronger effects on bacterial communities than did glyphosate, which only explained 2 to 5% of the variation. Less than 1% of all taxa were impacted by glyphosate, more in soils with a long history of use, and more increased than decreased in relative abundance. Glyphosate had minimal impacts on soil and rhizosphere bacteria of wheat, although dying roots after glyphosate application may provide a "greenbridge" favoring some copiotrophic taxa. Glyphosate (Roundup) is the most widely used herbicide in the world and the foundation of Roundup Ready soybeans, corn, and the no-till cropping system. However, there have been recent concerns about nontarget impacts of glyphosate on soil microbes. Using next-generation sequencing methods and glyphosate treatments of wheat plants, we described the bacterial communities in the soil and rhizosphere of wheat grown in Pacific Northwest soils across multiple years, different locations, and soils with different histories of glyphosate use. The effects of glyphosate were subtle and much less than those of drivers such as location and cropping systems. Only a small percentage of the bacterial groups were influenced by glyphosate, and most of those were stimulated, probably because of the dying roots. This study provides important information for the future of this important tool for no-till systems and the environmental benefits of reducing soil erosion and fossil fuel inputs.
草甘膦是全球使用最广泛的除草剂,也是免耕种植系统中控制杂草的关键工具。然而,人们担心长期使用草甘膦对土壤微生物群落的非靶标影响。我们研究了在有和没有长期草甘膦使用历史的土壤中,重复施用草甘膦对小麦土壤和根际细菌群落的影响。我们在温室中使用来自4对免耕(有20年左右草甘膦使用历史)或无使用历史的田间土壤种植小麦。在每个种植周期,我们用草甘膦(田间用量的2倍)或通过切除地上部分来处理植株,并对土壤和根际细菌群落进行表征。与草甘膦相比,位置、种植历史、年份以及与根系的距离对细菌群落的影响要大得多,草甘膦仅解释了2%至5%的变异。所有分类单元中不到1%受到草甘膦的影响,在有长期使用历史的土壤中受影响更多,相对丰度增加的比减少的更多。草甘膦对小麦的土壤和根际细菌影响极小,尽管施用草甘膦后死亡的根系可能为一些富养型分类单元提供了一个“绿色桥梁”。草甘膦(农达)是世界上使用最广泛的除草剂,也是抗农达大豆、玉米和免耕种植系统的基础。然而,最近人们担心草甘膦对土壤微生物的非靶标影响。我们使用下一代测序方法和对小麦植株进行草甘膦处理后,描述了多年来在太平洋西北地区不同位置、不同草甘膦使用历史的土壤中种植的小麦的土壤和根际细菌群落。草甘膦的影响很细微,远小于位置和种植系统等驱动因素的影响。只有一小部分细菌类群受到草甘膦的影响,其中大多数受到刺激,可能是因为根系死亡。这项研究为免耕系统这一重要工具的未来发展以及减少土壤侵蚀和化石燃料投入的环境效益提供了重要信息。