Curate F, Umbelino C, Perinha A, Nogueira C, Silva A M, Cunha E
Research Centre for Anthropology and Health, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; Interdisciplinary Center for Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Research Centre for Anthropology and Health, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; Interdisciplinary Center for Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2017 Nov;52:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
The assessment of sex is of paramount importance in the establishment of the biological profile of a skeletal individual. Femoral relevance for sex estimation is indisputable, particularly when other exceedingly dimorphic skeletal regions are missing. As such, this study intended to generate population-specific osteometric models for the estimation of sex with the femur and to compare the accuracy of the models obtained through classical and machine-learning classifiers. A set of 15 standard femoral measurements was acquired in a training sample (100 females; 100 males) from the Coimbra Identified Skeletal Collection (University of Coimbra, Portugal) and models for sex classification were produced with logistic regression (LR), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machines (SVM), and reduce error pruning trees (REPTree). Under cross-validation, univariable sectioning points generated with REPTree correctly estimated sex in 60.0-87.5% of cases (systematic error ranging from 0.0 to 37.0%), while multivariable models correctly classified sex in 84.0-92.5% of cases (bias from 0.0 to 7.0%). All models were assessed in a holdout sample (24 females; 34 males) from the 21st Century Identified Skeletal Collection (University of Coimbra, Portugal), with an allocation accuracy ranging from 56.9 to 86.2% (bias from 4.4 to 67.0%) in the univariable models, and from 84.5 to 89.7% (bias from 3.7 to 23.3%) in the multivariable models. This study makes available a detailed description of sexual dimorphism in femoral linear dimensions in two Portuguese identified skeletal samples, emphasizing the relevance of the femur for the estimation of sex in skeletal remains in diverse conditions of completeness and preservation.
在确定骨骼个体的生物学特征时,性别评估至关重要。股骨在性别估计中的相关性无可争议,尤其是当其他极度二态性的骨骼区域缺失时。因此,本研究旨在生成特定人群的股骨骨测量模型以估计性别,并比较通过经典分类器和机器学习分类器获得的模型的准确性。从葡萄牙科英布拉大学的科英布拉已识别骨骼收藏中选取了一个训练样本(100名女性;100名男性),获取了一组15项标准股骨测量数据,并使用逻辑回归(LR)、线性判别分析(LDA)、支持向量机(SVM)和减少误差剪枝树(REPTree)生成了性别分类模型。在交叉验证中,由REPTree生成的单变量分割点在60.0 - 87.5%的案例中正确估计了性别(系统误差范围为0.0至37.0%),而多变量模型在84.0 - 92.5%的案例中正确分类了性别(偏差为0.0至7.0%)。所有模型在来自葡萄牙科英布拉大学21世纪已识别骨骼收藏的一个验证样本(24名女性;34名男性)中进行评估,单变量模型的分配准确率范围为56.9至86.2%(偏差为4.4至67.0%),多变量模型的分配准确率范围为84.5至89.7%(偏差为3.7至23.3%)。本研究详细描述了两个葡萄牙已识别骨骼样本中股骨线性尺寸的性别二态性,强调了在不同完整性和保存条件下股骨对于骨骼遗骸性别估计的相关性。