de Waele Catherine, Shen Qiwen, Magnani Christophe, Curthoys Ian S
CNRS UMR 8257, Cognition and Action Group, Centre Universitaire des Saints-Peres, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
ENT Department, Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France.
Front Neurol. 2017 Aug 18;8:419. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00419. eCollection 2017.
We examined the eye movement response patterns of a group of patients with bilateral vestibular loss (BVL) during suppression head impulse testing. Some showed a new saccadic strategy that may have potential for explaining how patients use saccades to recover from vestibular loss.
Eight patients with severe BVL [vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gains less than 0.35 and absent otolithic function] were tested. All patients were given the Dizziness Handicap Inventory and questioned about oscillopsia during abrupt head movements. Two paradigms of video head impulse testing of the horizontal VOR were used: (1) the classical head impulse paradigm [called head impulse test (HIMPs)]-fixating an earth-fixed target during the head impulse and (2) the new complementary test paradigm-fixating a head-fixed target during the head impulse (called SHIMPs). The VOR gain of HIMPs was quantified by two algorithms.
During SHIMPs testing, some BVL patients consistently generated an inappropriate covert compensatory saccade during the head impulse that required a corresponding large anti-compensatory saccade at the end of the head impulse in order to obey the instructions to maintain gaze on the head-fixed target. By contrast, other BVL patients did not generate this inappropriate covert saccade and did not exhibit a corresponding anti-compensatory saccade. The latencies of the covert saccade in SHIMPs and HIMPs were similar.
The pattern of covert saccades during SHIMPs appears to be related to the reduction of oscillopsia during abrupt head movements. BVL patients who did not report oscillopsia showed this unusual saccadic pattern, whereas BVL patients who reported oscillopsia did not show this pattern. This inappropriate covert SHIMPs saccade may be an objective indicator of how some patients with vestibular loss have learned to trigger covert saccades during head movements in everyday life.
我们研究了一组双侧前庭丧失(BVL)患者在抑制性摇头试验期间的眼球运动反应模式。一些患者表现出一种新的扫视策略,这可能有助于解释患者如何利用扫视来从前庭丧失中恢复。
对8例重度BVL患者[前庭眼反射(VOR)增益小于0.35且耳石功能缺失]进行测试。所有患者均接受眩晕 handicap 量表评估,并被询问在突然头部运动时的视振荡情况。使用了两种水平VOR视频摇头试验范式:(1)经典摇头范式[称为摇头试验(HIMPs)]——在摇头期间注视固定于地面的目标;(2)新的补充试验范式——在摇头期间注视固定于头部的目标(称为SHIMPs)。通过两种算法对HIMPs的VOR增益进行量化。
在SHIMPs测试期间,一些BVL患者在摇头期间持续产生不适当的隐蔽性代偿性扫视,这需要在摇头结束时进行相应的大的反代偿性扫视,以便遵守保持注视固定于头部目标的指令。相比之下,其他BVL患者未产生这种不适当的隐蔽性扫视,也未表现出相应的反代偿性扫视。SHIMPs和HIMPs中隐蔽性扫视的潜伏期相似。
SHIMPs期间隐蔽性扫视的模式似乎与突然头部运动期间视振荡的减少有关。未报告视振荡的BVL患者表现出这种不寻常的扫视模式,而报告视振荡的BVL患者未表现出这种模式。这种不适当的隐蔽性SHIMPs扫视可能是一些前庭丧失患者在日常生活中如何学会在头部运动期间触发隐蔽性扫视的客观指标。