• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活体共聚焦显微镜观察眼移植物抗宿主病的角膜特征

Corneal features in ocular graft-versus-host disease by in vivo confocal microscopy.

作者信息

Tepelus Tudor C, Chiu Gloria B, Maram Jyotsna, Huang Jianyan, Chopra Vikas, Sadda SriniVas R, Lee Olivia L

机构信息

Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute, 1355 San Pablo Street, DVRC 211, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.

Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 100 Stein Plaza UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;255(12):2389-2397. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3759-x. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-017-3759-x
PMID:28875340
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to determine the morphological features of the corneal epithelial layers, sub-basal nerve plexus and anterior stroma in patients with ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD) compared to non-GVHD dry eyes and normal controls, using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).

METHODS

IVCM was used to capture central cornea images from eight volunteers with normal healthy eyes, ten patients with non-GVHD dry eye syndrome (DES) and 15 patients with clinically diagnosed oGVHD, in a cross-sectional study. Morphological changes of the corneal epithelial layers and anterior stroma, characteristics of corneal nerves and presence of dendritic cells (DCs) were then evaluated.

RESULTS

IVCM images obtained from 66 eyes were analyzed. The density of superficial epithelial cells was 636.07 ± 101.05 cells/mm in the oGVHD group, 827 ± 99.62 cells/mm in the DES group and 1277.2 ± 121.42 cells/mm in the control group (P < 0.001). The density of wing cells was 4499.79 ± 976.36 cells/mm in the oGVHD group, 4662.85 ± 319.72 cells/mm in DES group and 6556.38 ± 503.99 cells/mm in the control group (p < 0.001). The density of basal cells was 7850.93 ± 723.51 cells/mm in the oGVHD group, 8570 ± 913.32 cells/mm in DES group and 9759.8 ± 251.99 cells/mm in the control group (p < 0.01). The density of nerve fibers was 11.22 ± 5.46 mm/mm in the oGVHD group, 14.50 ± 4.27 mm/mm in DES group and 19.56 ± 4.75 mm/mm in the control group (p < 0.01). The DC density was 67.88 ± 71.82 cells/mm in the oGVHD group, 40.06 ± 31.95 cells/mm in the DES group and 29.45 ± 8.1 cells/mm in the control group (P > 0.05). Visible networks of activated keratocytes were seen in the anterior stroma of eyes with oGVHD and DES, but not in normal controls.

CONCLUSIONS

IVCM revealed distinct microstructural changes in the corneas of patients with oGVHD and DES, similar between the two groups. Our findings suggest implications for use of IVCM to evaluate and monitor patients with dry eyes associated or not with GVHD.

摘要

目的

我们研究的目的是使用共聚焦显微镜(IVCM),确定与非移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)干眼症患者及正常对照相比,眼部移植物抗宿主病(oGVHD)患者角膜上皮层、基底神经丛和前基质的形态学特征。

方法

在一项横断面研究中,使用IVCM从8名健康志愿者、10名非GVHD干眼症综合征(DES)患者和15名临床诊断为oGVHD的患者中获取中央角膜图像。然后评估角膜上皮层和前基质的形态学变化、角膜神经特征以及树突状细胞(DC)的存在情况。

结果

对从66只眼中获得的IVCM图像进行了分析。oGVHD组浅表上皮细胞密度为636.07±101.05个细胞/mm,DES组为827±99.62个细胞/mm,对照组为1277.2±121.42个细胞/mm(P<0.001)。oGVHD组翼状细胞密度为4499.79±976.36个细胞/mm,DES组为4662.85±319.72个细胞/mm,对照组为6556.38±503.99个细胞/mm(p<0.001)。oGVHD组基底细胞密度为7850.93±723.51个细胞/mm,DES组为8570±913.32个细胞/mm,对照组为9759.8±251.99个细胞/mm(p<0.01)。oGVHD组神经纤维密度为11.22±5.46mm/mm,DES组为14.50±4.27mm/mm,对照组为19.56±4.75mm/mm(p<0.01)。oGVHD组DC密度为67.88±71.82个细胞/mm,DES组为40.06±31.95个细胞/mm,对照组为29.45±8.1个细胞/mm(P>0.05)。在oGVHD和DES患者的眼前基质中可见活化角膜细胞的可见网络,但在正常对照中未见。

结论

IVCM显示oGVHD和DES患者角膜存在明显的微观结构变化,两组相似。我们的研究结果表明IVCM在评估和监测与GVHD相关或不相关的干眼症患者方面具有应用价值。

相似文献

1
Corneal features in ocular graft-versus-host disease by in vivo confocal microscopy.活体共聚焦显微镜观察眼移植物抗宿主病的角膜特征
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;255(12):2389-2397. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3759-x. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
2
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Dry Eye Disease Associated With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.与慢性移植物抗宿主病相关的干眼病的体内共聚焦显微镜检查
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Sep 1;57(11):4686-91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20013.
3
In vivo confocal microscopic characterisation of the cornea in chronic graft-versus-host disease related severe dry eye disease.慢性移植物抗宿主病相关严重干眼病中角膜的体内共聚焦显微镜特征分析
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;99(2):160-5. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305072. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
4
Characterization of Corneal Involvement in Eyes With Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy.通过活体共聚焦显微镜对黏膜类天疱疮累及眼部角膜情况的特征分析
Cornea. 2017 Aug;36(8):933-941. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001201.
5
Correlation between corneal innervation and inflammation evaluated with confocal microscopy and symptomatology in patients with dry eye syndromes: a preliminary study.干眼综合征患者角膜神经支配与炎症的相关性:共聚焦显微镜检查及症状学评估的初步研究
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep;255(9):1771-1778. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3680-3. Epub 2017 May 20.
6
Risk factors for the development of ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) dry eye syndrome in patients with chronic GVHD.慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)患者发生眼部移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)干眼综合征的危险因素。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;99(11):1514-8. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306438. Epub 2015 May 6.
7
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Evaluation of Ocular Surface with Graft-Versus-Host Disease-Related Dry Eye Disease.移植物抗宿主病相关干眼的活体共聚焦显微镜评估。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 6;7(1):10720. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10237-w.
8
Corneal Epithelial Immune Dendritic Cell Alterations in Subtypes of Dry Eye Disease: A Pilot In Vivo Confocal Microscopic Study.干眼疾病亚型中角膜上皮免疫树突状细胞的改变:一项体内共聚焦显微镜初步研究
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Nov;56(12):7179-85. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17433.
9
Assessment of Corneal Changes Associated with Topical Antiglaucoma Therapy Using in vivo Confocal Microscopy.使用活体共聚焦显微镜评估与局部抗青光眼治疗相关的角膜变化
Ophthalmic Res. 2019;61(1):51-59. doi: 10.1159/000484632. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
10
Evaluation of the corneal epithelium in non-Sjögren's and Sjögren's dry eyes: an in vivo confocal microscopy study using HRT III RCM.非干燥综合征和干燥综合征干眼患者角膜上皮的评估:一项使用HRT III RCM的活体共聚焦显微镜研究
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0971-3.

引用本文的文献

1
In vivo Confocal Microscopy for Corneal and Ocular Surface Pathologies: A Comprehensive Review.用于角膜和眼表疾病的体内共聚焦显微镜检查:全面综述。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 7;19:1817-1834. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S519705. eCollection 2025.
2
A New Treatment for Recalcitrant Neurotrophic Keratopathy of Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease with Virus Infection.一种治疗伴有病毒感染的眼部移植物抗宿主病顽固性神经营养性角膜病变的新方法。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Feb;13(2):469-479. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00857-z. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
3
Challenges and concepts in the diagnosis and management of ocular graft-versus-host disease.

本文引用的文献

1
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Dry Eye Disease Associated With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.与慢性移植物抗宿主病相关的干眼病的体内共聚焦显微镜检查
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Sep 1;57(11):4686-91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20013.
2
Predictive models for ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease diagnosis and disease activity in transplant clinical practice.移植临床实践中眼部慢性移植物抗宿主病诊断及疾病活动度的预测模型
Haematologica. 2015 Sep;100(9):1228-36. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.124131. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
3
In vivo confocal microscopic characterisation of the cornea in chronic graft-versus-host disease related severe dry eye disease.
眼部移植物抗宿主病诊断与管理中的挑战与概念
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 16;10:1133381. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1133381. eCollection 2023.
4
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Different Types of Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.不同类型干眼和睑板腺功能障碍的体内共聚焦显微镜检查
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 22;11(9):2349. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092349.
5
Alterations in corneal nerves in different subtypes of dry eye disease: An in vivo confocal microscopy study.不同亚型干眼疾病中角膜神经的改变:一项活体共聚焦显微镜研究。
Ocul Surf. 2021 Oct;22:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
6
Update on ocular graft-versus-host disease.眼移植物抗宿主病的最新进展。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 May;69(5):1038-1050. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2016_20.
7
Corneal graft melting: a systematic review.角膜移植片溶解:一项系统评价
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 18;13(3):493-502. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.03.19. eCollection 2020.
8
Amniotic membrane transplantation for managing dry eye and neurotrophic keratitis.羊膜移植治疗干眼症和神经营养性角膜炎。
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 4;10(1):13-21. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_5_20. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
9
Complement and CD4 T cells drive context-specific corneal sensory neuropathy.补体和 CD4 T 细胞驱动特定于角膜感觉神经病变的发病机制。
Elife. 2019 Aug 15;8:e48378. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48378.
10
Ocular surface system alterations in ocular graft-versus-host disease: all the pieces of the complex puzzle.眼部移植物抗宿主病中的眼表系统改变:复杂谜题的所有碎片。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;257(7):1341-1351. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04301-6. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
慢性移植物抗宿主病相关严重干眼病中角膜的体内共聚焦显微镜特征分析
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;99(2):160-5. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305072. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
4
Ocular manifestations of graft-versus-host disease.移植物抗宿主病的眼部表现。
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;27(3):215-22. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2013.06.007.
5
In vivo confocal microscopy of the ocular surface: from bench to bedside.眼表活体共聚焦显微镜:从基础到临床。
Curr Eye Res. 2014 Mar;39(3):213-31. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.842592. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
6
Bilateral corneal ulceration in ocular graft-versus-host disease.眼部移植物抗宿主病中的双侧角膜溃疡
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:2153-8. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S51180. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
7
In vivo confocal evaluation of the ocular surface morpho-functional unit in dry eye.干眼患者眼表形态功能单位的体内共聚焦评估
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jun;90(6):576-86. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318294c184.
8
Ocular graft-versus-host disease: a review.眼移植物抗宿主病:综述。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2013 May-Jun;58(3):233-51. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.08.004. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
9
Prevalence of dry eye syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.异基因造血干细胞移植后干燥综合征的患病率。
Cornea. 2013 May;32(5):e97-101. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318276bc56.
10
In vivo confocal microscopy in dry eye disease and related conditions.干眼疾病及相关病症的体内共聚焦显微镜检查
Semin Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Nov;27(5-6):138-48. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2012.711416.