Suppr超能文献

课程修订与改革:过程、要点及经验教训

Curricular Revision and Reform: The Process, What Was Important, and Lessons Learned.

作者信息

Ilkiw Jan E, Nelson Richard W, Watson Johanna L, Conley Alan J, Raybould Helen E, Chigerwe Munashe, Boudreaux Karen

出版信息

J Vet Med Educ. 2017 Fall;44(3):480-489. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0316-068R.

Abstract

Beginning in 2005, the Doctor of Veterinary Medicine program at the University of California underwent major curricular review and reform. To provide information for others that follow, we have documented our process and commented on factors that were critical to success, as well as factors we found surprising, difficult, or problematic. The review and reform were initiated by the Executive Committee, who led the process and commissioned the committees. The planning stage took 6 years and involved four faculty committees, while the implementation stage took 5 years and was led by the Curriculum Committee. We are now in year 2 of the institutionalizing stage and no longer refer to our reform as the "new curriculum." The change was driven by a desire to improve the curriculum and the learning environment of the students by aligning the delivery of information with current teaching methodologies and implementing adult learning strategies. We moved from a department- and discipline-based curriculum to a school-wide integrated block curriculum that emphasized student-centered, inquiry-based learning. A limit was placed on in-class time to allow students to apply classroom knowledge by solving problems and cases. We found the journey long and arduous, requiring tremendous commitment and effort. In the change process, we learned the importance of adequate planning, leadership, communication, and a reward structure for those doing the "heavy lifting." Specific to our curricular design, we learned the importance of the block leader role, of setting clear expectations for students, and of partnering with students on the journey.

摘要

从2005年开始,加利福尼亚大学的兽医学博士项目经历了重大的课程审查和改革。为了给后续的人提供信息,我们记录了我们的过程,并对那些对成功至关重要的因素,以及我们发现令人惊讶、困难或有问题的因素进行了评论。审查和改革由执行委员会发起,该委员会领导了这一过程并委托各委员会开展工作。规划阶段耗时6年,涉及四个教师委员会,而实施阶段耗时5年,由课程委员会领导。我们现在处于制度化阶段的第2年,不再将我们的改革称为“新课程”。这一变革的驱动力是希望通过使信息传递与当前教学方法保持一致,并实施成人学习策略,来改进课程和学生的学习环境。我们从基于部门和学科的课程转变为全校范围的综合模块课程,该课程强调以学生为中心、基于探究的学习。对课堂时间进行了限制,以便学生通过解决问题和案例来应用课堂知识。我们发现这段历程漫长而艰辛,需要巨大的投入和努力。在变革过程中,我们认识到充分规划、领导力、沟通以及为那些承担“重任”的人建立奖励机制的重要性。就我们的课程设计而言,我们认识到模块负责人角色的重要性、对学生设定明确期望的重要性,以及在这个过程中与学生合作的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验